<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BLOGOSPHERE&#8230; WE HAVE A PROBLEM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 11:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PoliGazette &#187; Former FEC Commish Brad Smith on Obama&#8217;s Federal Financing Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1306265</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliGazette &#187; Former FEC Commish Brad Smith on Obama&#8217;s Federal Financing Dilemma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/#comment-1306265</guid>
		<description>[...] Smith alerted bloggers back in 2005 to some of the more onerous requirements of McCain-Feingold while sounding the alarm over how the FEC might interpret the law. So I was pleased to receive such expert instruction on the ins and outs of campaign finance from someone intimately familiar with the process. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Smith alerted bloggers back in 2005 to some of the more onerous requirements of McCain-Feingold while sounding the alarm over how the FEC might interpret the law. So I was pleased to receive such expert instruction on the ins and outs of campaign finance from someone intimately familiar with the process. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; THE FEC VS. BLOGS</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-950188</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; THE FEC VS. BLOGS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/#comment-950188</guid>
		<description>[...] - Steven Bainbridge: &#8220;Thank You Senators McCain and Feingold &#8230; you [plural expletive deleted]&#8221; - Pajama Hadin: &#8220;The Coming Crackdown on Blogging&#8221; - Rightwing Nuthouse: &#8220;BLOGOSPHEREâ€¦ WE HAVE A PROBLEM&#8221; - Say Anything: &#8220;Political Blogging To Be Outlawed?&#8221; - Baronger&#8217;s Scribblings: &#8220;Political Prisoners coming to the United States?&#8221; - Mike Krempasky: &#8220;FEC regulating Blogging?&#8221; - Susanna Cornett, &#8220;Will blogging be restricted by the government?&#8221; - Hennessy&#8217;s View: &#8220;McCain-Feingold Outlaws Blogging?&#8221; - The Anchoress, &#8220;You knew this was coming, and right on time&#8230;&#8221; - The invaluable Captain Ed, who has long assailed the back-door First Amendment violations of the McCain-Feingold Act, writes: Bigger blogs will come under closer scrutiny, which means that any expression of support on CQ with a referential hyperlink may well get valued at more than the $2,000 maximum hard-cash contribution. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] - Steven Bainbridge: &#8220;Thank You Senators McCain and Feingold &#8230; you [plural expletive deleted]&#8221; - Pajama Hadin: &#8220;The Coming Crackdown on Blogging&#8221; - Rightwing Nuthouse: &#8220;BLOGOSPHEREâ€¦ WE HAVE A PROBLEM&#8221; - Say Anything: &#8220;Political Blogging To Be Outlawed?&#8221; - Baronger&#8217;s Scribblings: &#8220;Political Prisoners coming to the United States?&#8221; - Mike Krempasky: &#8220;FEC regulating Blogging?&#8221; - Susanna Cornett, &#8220;Will blogging be restricted by the government?&#8221; - Hennessy&#8217;s View: &#8220;McCain-Feingold Outlaws Blogging?&#8221; - The Anchoress, &#8220;You knew this was coming, and right on time&#8230;&#8221; - The invaluable Captain Ed, who has long assailed the back-door First Amendment violations of the McCain-Feingold Act, writes: Bigger blogs will come under closer scrutiny, which means that any expression of support on CQ with a referential hyperlink may well get valued at more than the $2,000 maximum hard-cash contribution. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-193915</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 17:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/#comment-193915</guid>
		<description>These are the times that try mens souls! Indeed, as george bush will tell you, we are living in a perilous world, and to fight terrorists we have to be willing to give up some of our freedoms. If giving up websites like the nuthouse is required in the war against terror then I for one am willing to make that sacrifice. Good bye wingnuts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are the times that try mens souls! Indeed, as george bush will tell you, we are living in a perilous world, and to fight terrorists we have to be willing to give up some of our freedoms. If giving up websites like the nuthouse is required in the war against terror then I for one am willing to make that sacrifice. Good bye wingnuts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nospeedbumps.com</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-2301</link>
		<dc:creator>nospeedbumps.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 18:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/#comment-2301</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Speech Regulators to the Rescue!&lt;/strong&gt;
Looks like the government is discovering bloggers and is starting in motion the process to regulate them. I guess that we just can't have these bloggers running loose saying whatever they want! Bloggers are really just advertising for variously politi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Speech Regulators to the Rescue!</strong><br />
Looks like the government is discovering bloggers and is starting in motion the process to regulate them. I guess that we just can&#8217;t have these bloggers running loose saying whatever they want! Bloggers are really just advertising for variously politi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kender</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Kender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>What of google?  Does each link that google gives you in a search count as a contribution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What of google?  Does each link that google gives you in a search count as a contribution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baby Wings</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Baby Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Political Blogging to be Shut Down&lt;/strong&gt;
Or at the very least, regulated?

What??

So MM can make a movie for profit that bashes one candidate, and the millions he rakes in don't get counted as political donations? 

This is my little corner of the VRWC. It's my Blog. No one is paying...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Political Blogging to be Shut Down</strong><br />
Or at the very least, regulated?</p>
<p>What??</p>
<p>So MM can make a movie for profit that bashes one candidate, and the millions he rakes in don&#8217;t get counted as political donations? </p>
<p>This is my little corner of the VRWC. It&#8217;s my Blog. No one is paying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cao's Blog</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Cao's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Fed's crackdown on blogging&lt;/strong&gt;
Got this in an email from Superhawk at Rightwing Nuthouse:

If we blog in 2008 the way we did this past election, we'll be leaving ourselves open to fines.

What happened to our freedom of speech?  Looks like it's going up in smoke:

Bradley Sm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Fed&#8217;s crackdown on blogging</strong><br />
Got this in an email from Superhawk at Rightwing Nuthouse:</p>
<p>If we blog in 2008 the way we did this past election, we&#8217;ll be leaving ourselves open to fines.</p>
<p>What happened to our freedom of speech?  Looks like it&#8217;s going up in smoke:</p>
<p>Bradley Sm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 13:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Is the FEC going to regulate Holywood also?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the FEC going to regulate Holywood also?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myopic Zeal</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Myopic Zeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;FEC, Blogging and Political Speech&lt;/strong&gt;
There is a storm brewing.

If you haven't read this CNET story, check it out:

Bradley Smith says that the freewheeling days of political blogging and online punditry are over. 
In just a few months, he warns, bloggers and news organizations coul...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FEC, Blogging and Political Speech</strong><br />
There is a storm brewing.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t read this CNET story, check it out:</p>
<p>Bradley Smith says that the freewheeling days of political blogging and online punditry are over.<br />
In just a few months, he warns, bloggers and news organizations coul&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 08:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/03/03/blogosphere-we-have-a-problem/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>If I &lt;i&gt;don't&lt;/i&gt; link to a political party, who do I collect my 2,000$ from? Do &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; know anyone who's making real money from blogging? I sure don't. The last time I checked my google ads had made me 2.09$ in just about four months.

This is no more likely to happen than a general internet tax, or an e-mail tax to subsidize USPS. It won't be happening any time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I <i>don&#8217;t</i> link to a political party, who do I collect my 2,000$ from? Do <i>you</i> know anyone who&#8217;s making real money from blogging? I sure don&#8217;t. The last time I checked my google ads had made me 2.09$ in just about four months.</p>
<p>This is no more likely to happen than a general internet tax, or an e-mail tax to subsidize USPS. It won&#8217;t be happening any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
