Comments on: GIULIANA SGRENA IS A LIAR

By: Rev. Mykeru

Rev. Mykeru — Wed, 09 Mar 2005 13:13:45 +0000

I suspect CNN.

By: superhawk

superhawk — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:11:26 +0000

I have NEVER deleted, edited, or otherwise tampered with a comment on this site.

I believe that if people want to make fools of themselves, they have my enthusiastic permission to do so.

By: Rev. Mykeru

Rev. Mykeru — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:17:06 +0000

Oh wait, there it is. Well, I’m going to claim conspiracy and media bias rather than admit to error. It seems to be the thing to do.

By: Rev. Mykeru

Rev. Mykeru — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:14:38 +0000

superhawk,

Do you have examples of her other writings to prove her “anti-Americanism”, or is your criticism that she just doesn’t have the right attitude towards being shot for no good reason. I know should some jihadist accidentally (or otherwise)shoot you there would be no hard feelings.

Incidentally, I find it exceedingly interesting that you edited your post to remove your remark about the AP reporter finding the Mauser rather than a policeman after I provided a cite to show you were wrong.

It would be Orwellian if it wasn’t so clumsy. No wonder PDF capture is my friend should you decide to edit my comments too.

By: superhawk

superhawk — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:11:08 +0000

To call Sgrena a journalist is laughable. She’s a propogandist for an ideology that has never placed a premium on truth. Or as Reagan used to say…”They reserve unto themselves the ability to lie, to cheat, to falsify history…”

If you can’t see that Sgrena’s statements became progessively more anti_American as the hours passed and she realized what a cause celbre on the left she had become, then you’re willfully blind.

By: Dianne

Dianne — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 07:57:14 +0000

No one has any faith in the US anymore except the neo-cons. All I see on everyone of your sites is slander of this woman on the grounds she is ‘left’.
OMG she’s left, she’s a commie, she’s anti-American. Well, I have news for you, most of the world is becoming anti-American. What about the Bulgarian soldier? I know another US mistake.
Why don’t you join secret service and put your life on the line like this man did? Or hell, become a reporter like Sgrena and risk your life trying to get the news to the people. Easy to be an armchair gunner isn’t it?

By: Jay

Jay — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 04:37:18 +0000

I got somethin else over at my site that you will want to see. I’m sorry to plug myself here so much, but I know you share common goals.

And thank you for helping to expose the ACLU. You will want to see this protest organizing. And again, the invitation to post at my blog is still out there, just let me know.

http://www.stoptheaclu.blogspot.com

By: Rev. Mykeru

Rev. Mykeru — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 03:37:10 +0000

“(BTW, it wasn’t a “cop” that made the statement about the Mauser in TSD, it was an AP reporter who saw the gun and mis ID’d it. The AP pulled the report in minutes…but not before NBC reported it.)”

Wrong. Apparently you are one of those people who never tires of pulling authoritative information from your ass:

Deputy Constable Seymour Weitzman was one of the police officers on the sixth floor of the depository. Upon glancing at the rifle, he thought the rifle looked like a 7.65 Mauser. He later made a statement to the Dallas police on November 23, and the FBI on November 23(page 1 and 2) and November 25 (page 1 and 2) stating the rifle he saw was a 7.65 Mauser.

In his Warren Commission testimony, he explained how he thought it was a Mauser, but he only glanced at it.

Mr. BALL. In the statement that you made to the Dallas Police Department that afternoon, you referred to the rifle as a 7.65 Mauser bolt action?

Mr. WEITZMAN. In a glance, that’s what it looked like.

Mr. BALL. That’s what it looked like did you say that or someone else say that?

Mr. WEITZMAN. No; I said that. I thought it was one .

[http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/mauser.htm]

By: superhawk

superhawk — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 01:38:29 +0000

Again, the question has to be asked…

WHAT SHE DOING STILL ALIVE IF SHE WAS A “TARGET” FOR ASSASSINATION?

Speaking of conspiracy theories (BTW, it wasn’t a “cop” that made the statement about the Mauser in TSD, it was an AP reporter who saw the gun and mis ID’d it. The AP pulled the report in minutes…but not before NBC reported it.) Ms. Sgrena has yet to explain how it could possibly have been a hit if the Americans didn’t even know she was released. The Italian intelligence service has admitted to not coordinating with our military on her release.

This should be pretty easy to understand even for a barking moonbat like you…How can the US military target someone for death when they don’t even know that the person targeted is within 100 miles of their checkpoint?

By: Rev. Mykeru

Rev. Mykeru — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 00:15:23 +0000

Superhawk,

Nah, that’s OK, we can snark at you over at my place (comments, message board and all) because, after all, your house has too many white sheets hanging on the line outside, if you get my less than subtle drift.

Besides, you’ve got the tinfoil hat on the wrong head, matey: Finding anomalies in eyewitness accounts is an old conspiracist’s ruse. There are still Kennedy Conspiracy whackjobs writing books because the first cop in the Texas School Book Depository mistook Oswald’s Mannlicher-Carcano for a Mauser, which are very similar. And even if cops know a “suspect is lying about committing a crime” they don’t expect the victim of a violent crime to have perfect recall. Giuliana Sgrena was the victim of a crime, not the people who shot her.