<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PBS? LIBERAL BIAS? YOU&#8217;RE KIDDING!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 09:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Obama, What Else Is &#8220;Not In My Pay Grade&#8221;: &#171; Riggword Weblog</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-1624257</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama, What Else Is &#8220;Not In My Pay Grade&#8221;: &#171; Riggword Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/#comment-1624257</guid>
		<description>[...] all seen how fair and balanced that lib-dominated, Bill Moyers-boosting private-public enterprise turned out.) (More On Soros and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all seen how fair and balanced that lib-dominated, Bill Moyers-boosting private-public enterprise turned out.) (More On Soros and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Follow the money: Welcome to Barack Obama’s “Social Investment Fund Network.”</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-1623052</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Follow the money: Welcome to Barack Obama’s “Social Investment Fund Network.”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/#comment-1623052</guid>
		<description>[...] No doubt with Soros’s approbation (if not advice from the hands-on “progressive” activist or his advisors), Obama fleshed out his Social Investment Fund Network plan last December. In concert with his mandatory volunteerism pitch and $6 billion anti-poverty plan, Obama called for the creation of a “Social Entrepreneurship Agency” to dispense the funds in unspecified amounts. The agency would be a government-supported nonprofit corporation “similar to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting,” which runs public television. (And we’ve all seen how fair and balanced that lib-dominated, Bill Moyers-boosting private-public enterprise turned out.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No doubt with Soros’s approbation (if not advice from the hands-on “progressive” activist or his advisors), Obama fleshed out his Social Investment Fund Network plan last December. In concert with his mandatory volunteerism pitch and $6 billion anti-poverty plan, Obama called for the creation of a “Social Entrepreneurship Agency” to dispense the funds in unspecified amounts. The agency would be a government-supported nonprofit corporation “similar to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting,” which runs public television. (And we’ve all seen how fair and balanced that lib-dominated, Bill Moyers-boosting private-public enterprise turned out.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; The Democrat Party platform&#8217;s hidden Soros Slush Fund</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-1622940</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; The Democrat Party platform&#8217;s hidden Soros Slush Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/#comment-1622940</guid>
		<description>[...] No doubt with Soros&#8217;s approbation (if not advice from the hands-on &#8220;progressive&#8221; activist or his advisors), Obama fleshed out his Social Investment Fund Network plan last December. In concert with his mandatory volunteerism pitch and $6 billion anti-poverty plan, Obama called for the creation of a &#8220;Social Entrepreneurship Agency&#8221; to dispense the funds in unspecified amounts. The agency would be a government-supported nonprofit corporation &#8220;similar to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting,&#8221; which runs public television. (And we&#8217;ve all seen how fair and balanced that lib-dominated, Bill Moyers-boosting private-public enterprise turned out.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No doubt with Soros&#8217;s approbation (if not advice from the hands-on &#8220;progressive&#8221; activist or his advisors), Obama fleshed out his Social Investment Fund Network plan last December. In concert with his mandatory volunteerism pitch and $6 billion anti-poverty plan, Obama called for the creation of a &#8220;Social Entrepreneurship Agency&#8221; to dispense the funds in unspecified amounts. The agency would be a government-supported nonprofit corporation &#8220;similar to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting,&#8221; which runs public television. (And we&#8217;ve all seen how fair and balanced that lib-dominated, Bill Moyers-boosting private-public enterprise turned out.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Johnston</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-23333</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/#comment-23333</guid>
		<description>Reading both conservative and liberal sites is instructive. I have never seen so much bias spread so wide across both spectrums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading both conservative and liberal sites is instructive. I have never seen so much bias spread so wide across both spectrums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: opit</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>opit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 05:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>I'm confused here. Aren't you alleging they cater to a demographic ? Like, that's the American Way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused here. Aren&#8217;t you alleging they cater to a demographic ? Like, that&#8217;s the American Way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dangerous Dan</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator>Dangerous Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 03:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/#comment-1707</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Reforming PBS&lt;/strong&gt;
It appears the Republican chairman of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (the entity in charge of PBS) wants to reform PBS so as to lessen its liberal bias.  Personally, I think it should be left well enough alone.  PBS has slowly sunk into public...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reforming PBS</strong><br />
It appears the Republican chairman of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (the entity in charge of PBS) wants to reform PBS so as to lessen its liberal bias.  Personally, I think it should be left well enough alone.  PBS has slowly sunk into public&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NIF</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-1706</link>
		<dc:creator>NIF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/#comment-1706</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Agent of Making Cheerleaders Squeal&lt;/strong&gt;
Today's dose of NIF - News, Interesting &#038; Funny ... Ugh, Monday ... and too cold out to put the top down ... TRACKBACK PARTY @ rightwingnuthouse.com!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Agent of Making Cheerleaders Squeal</strong><br />
Today&#8217;s dose of NIF - News, Interesting &#038; Funny &#8230; Ugh, Monday &#8230; and too cold out to put the top down &#8230; TRACKBACK PARTY @ rightwingnuthouse.com!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandagon</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-1702</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandagon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 15:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/05/02/pbs-liberal-bias-youre-kidding/#comment-1702</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Promise Of Riches&lt;/strong&gt;
I can't decide who's at fault here: Robert Coonrod, who stepped down as corporation president in July 2004, has known Mr. Tomlinson about 20 years and considers him a good friend. "I believe that his motives are exactly what he...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Promise Of Riches</strong><br />
I can&#8217;t decide who&#8217;s at fault here: Robert Coonrod, who stepped down as corporation president in July 2004, has known Mr. Tomlinson about 20 years and considers him a good friend. &#8220;I believe that his motives are exactly what he&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
