Comments on: ROVE, THE DESTROYER

By: valium overnight

valium overnight — Fri, 26 May 2006 21:47:09 +0000

valium overnight

feigned modularizes flush.renewable casting?smack!billows.interspersing?golf.zocor http://ctba.inspidered.com/view.php?url=http://www.4best-health.com/zocor.html

By: joe hillman

joe hillman — Sun, 26 Jun 2005 12:24:24 +0000

I don’t see the problem with treating the 9-11 attacks as a crime and not an act of war. If we had done that perhaps osama would be in a prison now and the guilty arrested and tried instead of osama still on the loose while our resources are inadvertantly being used as a proving ground for an increasingly terrorism capable and bomb making iraq insurgency. When a crime is commited the guilty are hunted down, without the thousands of innocent lives lost of mostly poor dark-skinned people. Rove is preaching to the converted. When he says liberals of course he is refering to dems rather than republicans, wouldn’t it be taken that way if Dean had talked about conservatives? Rove is a proven liar a creep such blather is expected and I agree that what he said is bullshit and lets quit hearing about it, totally un-newsworthy.

By: Joust The Facts

Joust The Facts — Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:09:35 +0000

Karl Rove Is Evil, After All

Maybe not so much.

By: NIF

NIF — Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:26:29 +0000

Umpire of The Duct-Taped Gerbil …

Today’s dose of NIF - News, Interesting & Funny … Just 3 days ’til Monday! (and did you see yesterday’s Riley-turns-1 pics?)

By: Aakash

Aakash — Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:16:17 +0000

Sorry for the double-posting… I used the back button on my browser, and then forwarded back.

By: Aakash

Aakash — Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:14:41 +0000

Many on the Right have also not been fans of Karl Rove… He has been blamed by some of my fellow conservatives for some of the non-conservative policies of the Bush administration.

But on foreign policy, Rove has actually been viewed, in some analysts of intra-administration politics, as a balance to the hard-line war hawks in the Bush administration. Some of them had wanted another pre-emptive war during the first term, and they expressed concerns, during the Fall of 2003, when it was reported that people like Karl Rove and Grover Norquist were advising President Bush to avoid any more such wars… ["No Wars in '04!"]

As for Rove’s current statements, I think that he was being excessively reductionist in those remarks… Something that one would expect more from some parts of the Blogosphere than from a White House advisor. But depending on the context and time constraints that those remarks were made in (I haven’t looked that up), that could be partly justified.

Asking for someone to resign over this is absurd. As for Dick Durbin, we will hopefully be able to defeat him in the next election.

By: Fresh Air

Fresh Air — Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:21:32 +0000

The way to inflict the worst injuries on the liberals is to quote them. That’s why the MSM is so important.

By: Iowa Voice

Iowa Voice — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:08:12 +0000

The Truth Hurts Sometimes

Democrats are up in arms because Karl Rove called it as it is, and they don’t like it one bit:

Bush’s chief political adviser, Rove said in a speech Wednesday that “liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments a…

By: Mark in Mexico

Mark in Mexico — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:01:51 +0000

But did he mention Hitler?

Karl Rove make a typical political statement and a firestorm breaks out. Well, a firestorm among the Democrats, anyway, which I will admit is more akin to a tempest in a teapot. He said,

By: Fritz

Fritz — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:46:28 +0000

Rick,
You are right, they consider liberal synonymous with Democrat. Democrats took the bait, the Durbin statements will get a whole new public hearing. Durbin was criticizing the US, Rove was criticizing liberals like Durbin. What are they going to counter with, Howard Dean’s UBL deserves a fair trial?