Comments on: AN “ALTERNATE VERSION” OF 9/11

By: Redhand

Redhand — Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:59:58 +0000

Classic NYT Speak: “their ‘rich, complex and politically and culturally divided’ lives.”

What utter nonsense as a rationale for the likes of “The Drawing Center.” THIS is a justification for retreating from the unifying event that they were all slaughtered by single-minded religious fanatics?

It’s been said in other places, but can you imagine what the NYT would suggest if given a clean slate to re-do the Arizona Memorial? These people are a joke.

By: Fritz

Fritz — Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:42:35 +0000

Rick,
Now what did Karl Rove say about liberals? Tolerance is not tolerating, it is acting in a tolerant manner towards others. Here the Times is tolerating intolerable art created by intolerant people revel in the destruction.

By: Fresh Air

Fresh Air — Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:21:18 +0000

Rick–

You’ve potted these a-holes in the kisser. What an unbelievable load of rubbish! As if, instead of remembering the appalling events of that day as they were–as we saw them with our own eyes–we should view them through the inscrutable lens of the New York Slimes editorial board. We must, after due reflection, decide there was some mitigating factor in their evil. Cultural sensitivity my ass!

The Slimes’ embracing of victimhood as the only morally pure position is such a tired old liberal trope one wonders if they pulled Anthony Lewis out of the deep-freeze and duct-taped his bony, tabescent fingers to the keyboard of a Smith-Corona manual to wheeze this editorial out.

I am increasingly believing there are two kinds of people in America: liberals and Americans.

Remember the Whig Party!