<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHAT&#8217;S IN A NAME?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/07/16/whats-in-a-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/07/16/whats-in-a-name/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TMH's Bacon Bits</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/07/16/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-75939</link>
		<dc:creator>TMH's Bacon Bits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=632#comment-75939</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Schumer and the Senate Plumbers&lt;/strong&gt;

	It goes without saying that the national press have been slow to jump on the Chuck Schumer/Michael Steele story. What story, you say? Oh, only the one that is quite reminiscent of Watergate, but in reverse.

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Schumer and the Senate Plumbers</strong></p>
<p>	It goes without saying that the national press have been slow to jump on the Chuck Schumer/Michael Steele story. What story, you say? Oh, only the one that is quite reminiscent of Watergate, but in reverse.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/07/16/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-23853</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=632#comment-23853</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Submitted for Your Approval&lt;/strong&gt;

First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher's Council for this week's vote. Council li...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Submitted for Your Approval</strong></p>
<p>First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council for this week&#8217;s vote. Council li&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bayonet</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/07/16/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-22483</link>
		<dc:creator>Bayonet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=632#comment-22483</guid>
		<description>The Plame-Out Hoax</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Plame-Out Hoax</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerfuffles</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/07/16/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-21767</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerfuffles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=632#comment-21767</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Leakgate, Rovegate or Wilsongate&lt;/strong&gt;

What to call a scandal that's not scandalous? How about Nadagate? I myself like "The Plame Kerfuffle". However, recent history demands that it must be suffixed with a "gate". In that case, I would choose "PlamingGate". However, I don't get to d...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Leakgate, Rovegate or Wilsongate</strong></p>
<p>What to call a scandal that&#8217;s not scandalous? How about Nadagate? I myself like &#8220;The Plame Kerfuffle&#8221;. However, recent history demands that it must be suffixed with a &#8220;gate&#8221;. In that case, I would choose &#8220;PlamingGate&#8221;. However, I don&#8217;t get to d&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deagle</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/07/16/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-21748</link>
		<dc:creator>deagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=632#comment-21748</guid>
		<description>PlameGame...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PlameGame&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
