<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RUM, ROMANISM, AND REBELLION</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/10/flashback-1960/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/10/flashback-1960/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 16:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Catholics Need Not Apply</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/10/flashback-1960/comment-page-1/#comment-166403</link>
		<dc:creator>Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Catholics Need Not Apply</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 21:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=691#comment-166403</guid>
		<description>[...] Update # 3:  Even more insightful comments on this issue, with discussion of the anti-Catholic bigotry that used to infect American politics, over at Right Wing Nuthouse.      Trackback URI &#160; [link] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update # 3:  Even more insightful comments on this issue, with discussion of the anti-Catholic bigotry that used to infect American politics, over at Right Wing Nuthouse.      Trackback URI &nbsp; [link] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/10/flashback-1960/comment-page-1/#comment-43925</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=691#comment-43925</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Council Has Spoken!&lt;/strong&gt;

First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; the winning entries in the Watcher's Council vote for this week are A Motive For Berger's Bizarre Beh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Council Has Spoken!</strong></p>
<p>First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; the winning entries in the Watcher&#8217;s Council vote for this week are A Motive For Berger&#8217;s Bizarre Beh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WILLisms.com</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/10/flashback-1960/comment-page-1/#comment-42239</link>
		<dc:creator>WILLisms.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=691#comment-42239</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Carnival Of The Vanities.&lt;/strong&gt;

Welcome to THE CARNIVAL OF VANITIES (part 152). The booths are arranged entirely chronologically, in order of receipt of submission. Every single submission is included. I rated the posts on a 0-10 scale. 0 = One of the most awful...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Carnival Of The Vanities.</strong></p>
<p>Welcome to THE CARNIVAL OF VANITIES (part 152). The booths are arranged entirely chronologically, in order of receipt of submission. Every single submission is included. I rated the posts on a 0-10 scale. 0 = One of the most awful&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moran</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/10/flashback-1960/comment-page-1/#comment-42090</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=691#comment-42090</guid>
		<description>You're right, of course. But Kennedy was fighting against a bias in which the only way he could win was by shaming enough bigots into ignoring his religion, holding their noses, and voting for him.

I think the operative line in my post is "On election day, the American people made a conscious choice to elect a Catholic President not because of his religion, but in spite of it."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, of course. But Kennedy was fighting against a bias in which the only way he could win was by shaming enough bigots into ignoring his religion, holding their noses, and voting for him.</p>
<p>I think the operative line in my post is &#8220;On election day, the American people made a conscious choice to elect a Catholic President not because of his religion, but in spite of it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/10/flashback-1960/comment-page-1/#comment-42088</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=691#comment-42088</guid>
		<description>During that campaign Kennedy also characterized his faith as &#147;an accident of birth&#148;.  Not precisely a call for religious tolerance, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During that campaign Kennedy also characterized his faith as &#8220;an accident of birth&#8221;.  Not precisely a call for religious tolerance, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/10/flashback-1960/comment-page-1/#comment-42018</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 07:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=691#comment-42018</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Submitted for Your Approval&lt;/strong&gt;

First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher's Council for this week's vote. Council li...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Submitted for Your Approval</strong></p>
<p>First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council for this week&#8217;s vote. Council li&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suek</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/10/flashback-1960/comment-page-1/#comment-39882</link>
		<dc:creator>suek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=691#comment-39882</guid>
		<description>"Catholic bishops threatened to exclude Senator John Kerry from the Eucharist because of his support for Roe v. Wade. The Senate Judiciary Committee is now fully justified in asking these bishops whether the same threats would apply to Supreme Court nominee Judge Roberts, if he were to vote to uphold Roe v. Wade."

Once again, liberals show that they cannot discriminate a difference between a person whose job it is to _make_ a law, and a person whose job it is to determine if a law has been broken.  Kerry's job in the Senate is to make laws.  As president, his job would be to _enforce_ laws made by the Congress.  Robert's job is to judge if a law adheres to the Constitution - not whether or not it's a good/bad law.  JUDGES ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO MAKE LAWS!  There would not be a conflict of interest as long as he judges and doesn't make laws.  Liberals _expect_ judges to make laws - that's why they have a problem with Roberts....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Catholic bishops threatened to exclude Senator John Kerry from the Eucharist because of his support for Roe v. Wade. The Senate Judiciary Committee is now fully justified in asking these bishops whether the same threats would apply to Supreme Court nominee Judge Roberts, if he were to vote to uphold Roe v. Wade.&#8221;</p>
<p>Once again, liberals show that they cannot discriminate a difference between a person whose job it is to _make_ a law, and a person whose job it is to determine if a law has been broken.  Kerry&#8217;s job in the Senate is to make laws.  As president, his job would be to _enforce_ laws made by the Congress.  Robert&#8217;s job is to judge if a law adheres to the Constitution - not whether or not it&#8217;s a good/bad law.  JUDGES ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO MAKE LAWS!  There would not be a conflict of interest as long as he judges and doesn&#8217;t make laws.  Liberals _expect_ judges to make laws - that&#8217;s why they have a problem with Roberts&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMH&#8217;s Bacon Bits  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; RUM, ROMANISM, AND REBELLION</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/10/flashback-1960/comment-page-1/#comment-39872</link>
		<dc:creator>TMH&#8217;s Bacon Bits  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; RUM, ROMANISM, AND REBELLION</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=691#comment-39872</guid>
		<description>[...] hat need to come down.  	Mr. Morris isn&#8217;t helping matters any. 	Originally posted at Rightwing Nuthouse 	 					 				 					 						This entry was posted 						  						 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hat need to come down.  	Mr. Morris isn&#8217;t helping matters any. 	Originally posted at Rightwing Nuthouse 	 					 				 					 						This entry was posted 						  						 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NIF</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/10/flashback-1960/comment-page-1/#comment-39871</link>
		<dc:creator>NIF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=691#comment-39871</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Opposite of Sleeping In&lt;/strong&gt;

Today's dose of NIF - News, Interesting &#38; Funny ... halfway there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Opposite of Sleeping In</strong></p>
<p>Today&#8217;s dose of NIF - News, Interesting &amp; Funny &#8230; halfway there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neddy's Palaver</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/10/flashback-1960/comment-page-1/#comment-39870</link>
		<dc:creator>Neddy's Palaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=691#comment-39870</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Religious Inquisitions&lt;/strong&gt;

&#8230; no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Religious Inquisitions</strong></p>
<p>&#8230; no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
