<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ABLE DANGER GETS SOME LEGS&#8230;MAYBE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/23/able-danger-gets-some-legsmaybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/23/able-danger-gets-some-legsmaybe/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 08:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blof hoodia 1163761816</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/23/able-danger-gets-some-legsmaybe/comment-page-1/#comment-402161</link>
		<dc:creator>Blof hoodia 1163761816</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=730#comment-402161</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;News on hoodia 1163761816 8655&lt;/strong&gt;

Find more on hoodia 1163761816</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>News on hoodia 1163761816 8655</strong></p>
<p>Find more on hoodia 1163761816</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Pundit</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/23/able-danger-gets-some-legsmaybe/comment-page-1/#comment-47584</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=730#comment-47584</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Able Danger Developments&lt;/strong&gt;

More witnesses have come forward to support the Able Danger claims, and the tone of Pentagon spokesman DiRita’s comments may cast doubt on the Pentagon’s intent to fully investigate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Able Danger Developments</strong></p>
<p>More witnesses have come forward to support the Able Danger claims, and the tone of Pentagon spokesman DiRita’s comments may cast doubt on the Pentagon’s intent to fully investigate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/23/able-danger-gets-some-legsmaybe/comment-page-1/#comment-47491</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=730#comment-47491</guid>
		<description>Your shredding party(s) is probably quite accurate. The political class first and foremost defends itself from attack, regardless the party affiliation. It's not hard to speculate that the DOD lawyers involved with blocking AD from talking to the FBI were also good with a shredder.

I would add to your analysis the very suspicious behavior of 9/11 Commission members to the AD revelations, they have been less than candid and their press releases usualy stand for less than a day's scrutiny, before becoming inoperative. Someone appears to be hiding something.

I think the 9/11 report fiddled the Atta timeline to discredit the reports of AQ meeting up with Iraqi agents in Prague. It also gives reason to why AD was left out of the 9/11 final report.

If the shredding party(s) were effective, it may never be possible to get to the truth -- But Congress should try by convening hearings ASAP. If you really want to fix the systemic problems, you need an absolute understanding of what failed. People's lives are in the balance.

The blogs need to run this until we know the truth, the leftist-MSM isn't going to, since doing so will inflict damage on the political class which has already signed off on the 9/11 version of the truth. As an aside is this what Dean meant when he talked about truth versioning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your shredding party(s) is probably quite accurate. The political class first and foremost defends itself from attack, regardless the party affiliation. It&#8217;s not hard to speculate that the DOD lawyers involved with blocking AD from talking to the FBI were also good with a shredder.</p>
<p>I would add to your analysis the very suspicious behavior of 9/11 Commission members to the AD revelations, they have been less than candid and their press releases usualy stand for less than a day&#8217;s scrutiny, before becoming inoperative. Someone appears to be hiding something.</p>
<p>I think the 9/11 report fiddled the Atta timeline to discredit the reports of AQ meeting up with Iraqi agents in Prague. It also gives reason to why AD was left out of the 9/11 final report.</p>
<p>If the shredding party(s) were effective, it may never be possible to get to the truth &#8212; But Congress should try by convening hearings ASAP. If you really want to fix the systemic problems, you need an absolute understanding of what failed. People&#8217;s lives are in the balance.</p>
<p>The blogs need to run this until we know the truth, the leftist-MSM isn&#8217;t going to, since doing so will inflict damage on the political class which has already signed off on the 9/11 version of the truth. As an aside is this what Dean meant when he talked about truth versioning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Carlton: codenamed  "Jack Lewis"</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/23/able-danger-gets-some-legsmaybe/comment-page-1/#comment-47490</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Carlton: codenamed  "Jack Lewis"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=730#comment-47490</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Headlines&lt;/strong&gt;

California redefines the family &#160; Navy Officer Affirms Assertions About Pre-9/11 Data on Atta &#160; Coverage: Balloon Juice, Michelle Malkin,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Headlines</strong></p>
<p>California redefines the family &nbsp; Navy Officer Affirms Assertions About Pre-9/11 Data on Atta &nbsp; Coverage: Balloon Juice, Michelle Malkin,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Able Danger Round Up 08/23/05</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/23/able-danger-gets-some-legsmaybe/comment-page-1/#comment-47488</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Able Danger Round Up 08/23/05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=730#comment-47488</guid>
		<description>[...]  bit of effort to chase down links!).  He covers a lot of groun so definitely go check out this post.   	Powerline has an interesting response to the NY T [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  bit of effort to chase down links!).  He covers a lot of groun so definitely go check out this post.   	Powerline has an interesting response to the NY T [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/23/able-danger-gets-some-legsmaybe/comment-page-1/#comment-47486</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=730#comment-47486</guid>
		<description>Also, National Geographic recently aired a program about the lead-up to 9/11 which makes reference to a 'chart' identifying two 9/11 terrorists in 2000.  Maybe the Commsioners and the Pentagon could ask the NG producers how they obtained information of such chart which apparently today does not exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, National Geographic recently aired a program about the lead-up to 9/11 which makes reference to a &#8216;chart&#8217; identifying two 9/11 terrorists in 2000.  Maybe the Commsioners and the Pentagon could ask the NG producers how they obtained information of such chart which apparently today does not exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/23/able-danger-gets-some-legsmaybe/comment-page-1/#comment-47485</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=730#comment-47485</guid>
		<description>Keep in mind that the transition period in 2000 was delayed several months due to the 2000 election fiasco.  Most of the prior adminstration's people were still in place until well into late spring/early summer.  I highly doubt the Bush adminstration had either the time or the people in place to review/dissolve the Able Danger program.

Remember Able Danger was a prototype operation and prior to 9/11 the political and social culture in America frowned upon the idea that the government data mines citizens.  I do not believe the prior adminstration really wanted anyone to know, including the incoming administration,  about such a military program existing.

Able Danger was dissovled not to hide 9/11 (because that had not yet occurred) but because it exposed the premise that the former Clinton adminstration developed data mining programs which operated under the radar, hidden from legal eagles like the ACLU's public scrutiny.  Remember too, that ever since the 1993 WTC bombing Islamic terrorism was basically treated as a law enforcement issue, not a military issue and, it is well known that law enforcement did not have available the data mining means to investigate Islamic terrorist cells in America, but the military did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind that the transition period in 2000 was delayed several months due to the 2000 election fiasco.  Most of the prior adminstration&#8217;s people were still in place until well into late spring/early summer.  I highly doubt the Bush adminstration had either the time or the people in place to review/dissolve the Able Danger program.</p>
<p>Remember Able Danger was a prototype operation and prior to 9/11 the political and social culture in America frowned upon the idea that the government data mines citizens.  I do not believe the prior adminstration really wanted anyone to know, including the incoming administration,  about such a military program existing.</p>
<p>Able Danger was dissovled not to hide 9/11 (because that had not yet occurred) but because it exposed the premise that the former Clinton adminstration developed data mining programs which operated under the radar, hidden from legal eagles like the ACLU&#8217;s public scrutiny.  Remember too, that ever since the 1993 WTC bombing Islamic terrorism was basically treated as a law enforcement issue, not a military issue and, it is well known that law enforcement did not have available the data mining means to investigate Islamic terrorist cells in America, but the military did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain's Quarters</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/23/able-danger-gets-some-legsmaybe/comment-page-1/#comment-47455</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain's Quarters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=730#comment-47455</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Able Danger: Pentagon Backlash Tries To Undermine Credibility&lt;/strong&gt;

The Pentagon continued its attempted public-relations recovery after almost two weeks of remaining silent on the Able Danger revelations. After issuing its official statement, spokesman Joseph Di Rita spoke out on Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer and their inabil...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Able Danger: Pentagon Backlash Tries To Undermine Credibility</strong></p>
<p>The Pentagon continued its attempted public-relations recovery after almost two weeks of remaining silent on the Able Danger revelations. After issuing its official statement, spokesman Joseph Di Rita spoke out on Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer and their inabil&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
