<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HUNTING REPUBWICANS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/09/29/hunting-repubwicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/09/29/hunting-repubwicans/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Poor Man Institute &#187; The eMasturbation Proclamation</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/09/29/hunting-repubwicans/comment-page-1/#comment-73696</link>
		<dc:creator>The Poor Man Institute &#187; The eMasturbation Proclamation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=803#comment-73696</guid>
		<description>[...] se to call this week.  A tie between the sheer, unadulterated WTF?-ness of the aptly-named Right Wing Nut House &#8230; 	The indictment of Republican Majority Leader  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] se to call this week.  A tie between the sheer, unadulterated WTF?-ness of the aptly-named Right Wing Nut House &#8230; 	The indictment of Republican Majority Leader  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Poor Man Institute &#187; Golden Winger nominations thread</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/09/29/hunting-repubwicans/comment-page-1/#comment-71910</link>
		<dc:creator>The Poor Man Institute &#187; Golden Winger nominations thread</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=803#comment-71910</guid>
		<description>[...] e the early returns: 	8. Eventhemoderate Tom Friedman. 7. Tom DeLay. 6. Blogs for Bush. 5. Right Wing Nut House. 4. Sully the Pooh. 3. Buttrocket. 2. Buttrocket. 1. Y [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e the early returns: 	8. Eventhemoderate Tom Friedman. 7. Tom DeLay. 6. Blogs for Bush. 5. Right Wing Nut House. 4. Sully the Pooh. 3. Buttrocket. 2. Buttrocket. 1. Y [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fritz</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/09/29/hunting-repubwicans/comment-page-1/#comment-71855</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=803#comment-71855</guid>
		<description>Big Texas,
You wrote:  â€œTexas law makes it a felony for corporations and labor unions to make political contributions to campaigns. 

That is correct, but that is not the charge.  Delay is being charged with conspiracy to break that law but was not charged breaking the law itself, had that charge been made, the conspiracy would be relevant.  Earle doesn't have evidence that law itself was violated.  He has already gone through the minutia surrounding the expenses allowed to be financed by corporate contributions.
Were corporate contributions accepted, yes.  Were the contributions legal, yes.  Were corporate contributions accepted by the PAC to cover eligible expenses previously paid with earlier raised hard money, yes.  Did this free up hard money to be distributed to campaigns, yes.  Can hard money be distributed to campaigns, yes.  Does Texas law recognize fungibility of contributions, yes.  Did the PAC's contributions to campaigns exceed hard money donations, no.  Is this a normal process in political fund raising, yes.  Where is the crime that was conspired?  Is this Earle's Florida Supreme Court changing the law after the fact for political semantics, yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Texas,<br />
You wrote:  â€œTexas law makes it a felony for corporations and labor unions to make political contributions to campaigns. </p>
<p>That is correct, but that is not the charge.  Delay is being charged with conspiracy to break that law but was not charged breaking the law itself, had that charge been made, the conspiracy would be relevant.  Earle doesn&#8217;t have evidence that law itself was violated.  He has already gone through the minutia surrounding the expenses allowed to be financed by corporate contributions.<br />
Were corporate contributions accepted, yes.  Were the contributions legal, yes.  Were corporate contributions accepted by the PAC to cover eligible expenses previously paid with earlier raised hard money, yes.  Did this free up hard money to be distributed to campaigns, yes.  Can hard money be distributed to campaigns, yes.  Does Texas law recognize fungibility of contributions, yes.  Did the PAC&#8217;s contributions to campaigns exceed hard money donations, no.  Is this a normal process in political fund raising, yes.  Where is the crime that was conspired?  Is this Earle&#8217;s Florida Supreme Court changing the law after the fact for political semantics, yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giacomo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/09/29/hunting-repubwicans/comment-page-1/#comment-71842</link>
		<dc:creator>Giacomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=803#comment-71842</guid>
		<description>Great(?) minds think alike.  You picked Elmer Fudd and Bugs Bunny; I chose Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great(?) minds think alike.  You picked Elmer Fudd and Bugs Bunny; I chose Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moran</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/09/29/hunting-repubwicans/comment-page-1/#comment-71689</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=803#comment-71689</guid>
		<description>I've read two different profiles of Earle and both reveal him to be a bullying partisan, active in Democratic politics for many years (Chairman of the Party in Travis County), and a cold, calculating politician. He may be a "tough lawyer" but that only proves my point. His bare knuckled advocacy skirts the ethics strictures constantly.

DeLay may not be going before a federal judge - you're right there - but the idea that campaign finance regulations aren't being circumvented every day of the week in Texas by both parties is loony. That's why indicting someone for violating laws that are followed only in the breach is so transparently partisan in nature and why Earle - even if he gets a conviction - will be viewed as the partisan hack that he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read two different profiles of Earle and both reveal him to be a bullying partisan, active in Democratic politics for many years (Chairman of the Party in Travis County), and a cold, calculating politician. He may be a &#8220;tough lawyer&#8221; but that only proves my point. His bare knuckled advocacy skirts the ethics strictures constantly.</p>
<p>DeLay may not be going before a federal judge - you&#8217;re right there - but the idea that campaign finance regulations aren&#8217;t being circumvented every day of the week in Texas by both parties is loony. That&#8217;s why indicting someone for violating laws that are followed only in the breach is so transparently partisan in nature and why Earle - even if he gets a conviction - will be viewed as the partisan hack that he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duke</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/09/29/hunting-repubwicans/comment-page-1/#comment-71518</link>
		<dc:creator>Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=803#comment-71518</guid>
		<description>That whole votes for crack deal was a bust. Anyways, I'm sitting on whole lot of rock here in Cuyahoga Falls and am thinking maybe we should plant this crap on one of those pinko senators. Give me a holler if your interested! (LOL)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That whole votes for crack deal was a bust. Anyways, I&#8217;m sitting on whole lot of rock here in Cuyahoga Falls and am thinking maybe we should plant this crap on one of those pinko senators. Give me a holler if your interested! (LOL)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Yoest</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/09/29/hunting-repubwicans/comment-page-1/#comment-71500</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Yoest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 03:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=803#comment-71500</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Should Corporations Donate to the Political Process?&lt;/strong&gt;

 Christine and Tom DeLay, with the Hammer Cake I ran into Tom DeLay and his wife Christine at an event earlier this year in your Nation's Capital. Before he was indicted for "criminal conspiracy," allegedly moving money from corporate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Should Corporations Donate to the Political Process?</strong></p>
<p> Christine and Tom DeLay, with the Hammer Cake I ran into Tom DeLay and his wife Christine at an event earlier this year in your Nation&#8217;s Capital. Before he was indicted for &#8220;criminal conspiracy,&#8221; allegedly moving money from corporate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Poor Man Institute &#187; Republican whining about DeLay/Frist - Episode 3: The sounds of silence</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/09/29/hunting-repubwicans/comment-page-1/#comment-71497</link>
		<dc:creator>The Poor Man Institute &#187; Republican whining about DeLay/Frist - Episode 3: The sounds of silence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=803#comment-71497</guid>
		<description>[...] totally innocent, the Democrats did it too, and he should step down.  Right Wing Nut House observes: 	The indictment of Republican Majority Leader Tom DeLay is one of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] totally innocent, the Democrats did it too, and he should step down.  Right Wing Nut House observes: 	The indictment of Republican Majority Leader Tom DeLay is one of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigTex</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/09/29/hunting-repubwicans/comment-page-1/#comment-71491</link>
		<dc:creator>BigTex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=803#comment-71491</guid>
		<description>You guys are way off base. First of all, a judge won't throw this out, because it IS a valid indictment, brought by the citizens of Texas. Rarely, even in political tussles such as this, do these get tossed. Indeed, it appears Mr. DeLay will have his day in court.

Secondly, this will not be tried in a federal courthouse, hence the phrase "something a federal judge will not find amusing â€“ federal judges having a much narrower sense of humor than your average Texas pol." is meaningless. DeLay was indicted on a single count of violating a state law. One that goes all the way back to Brown &#38; Root and LBJ. Yes, the same B&#38;R that is now in bed with the Bushes. See, big money really doesn't care who is in the WH, just as long as they are partial to big money's interests. Back in the day, B&#38;R gave $5K to every employee with the caveat they donate it to good ol' LBJ's senate campaign. When the tax man cometh looking for his cut of the $5K, the employees began to sing like canaries. Hence the law.

As far as Mr. Earle is concerned, I doubt seriously he's "Earle have come up through the ranks of their respective parties by successfully playing as close to the edge of the law that ethics and decency will allow, all the while â€œAw Shucksâ€-ing and backslapping their way through successful election campaigns. It is the campaigns themselves with the ungodly amounts of money raised and spent that grease the skids of law and politics at the statehouse level." From what I know he's a hard-nosed lawyer who has a strong disdain for ANYONE who breaks the law. He's not a big-time politico like DeLay. And, of the 15 political indictments he's brought forth, 12 have been against democrats, including the sitting Speaker of the Texas House, Gib Lewis (who resigned and pleaded down to two misdemeanors and hasn't been heard from since) and the sitting Attorney General, Jim Maddox.

Here is what Earle has to say about the LAW in Texas: "Texas law makes it a felony for corporations and labor unions to make political contributions to campaigns. The punishment is two to ten years in the penitentiary."

And, as far as "big money" campaigns go, PBS.org reports the average cost of a state-house campaign in Texas is $85,000. I'm guessing the DA race in Travis County wouldn't go much over $100K even in this day and age. Don't take my word for it, go check it out yourself at http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript324_full.html. And, while you are at it, there is another great article on this mess at: http://www.texasobserver.org/showArticle.asp?ArticleFileName=030829_f1.htm.

Enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are way off base. First of all, a judge won&#8217;t throw this out, because it IS a valid indictment, brought by the citizens of Texas. Rarely, even in political tussles such as this, do these get tossed. Indeed, it appears Mr. DeLay will have his day in court.</p>
<p>Secondly, this will not be tried in a federal courthouse, hence the phrase &#8220;something a federal judge will not find amusing â€“ federal judges having a much narrower sense of humor than your average Texas pol.&#8221; is meaningless. DeLay was indicted on a single count of violating a state law. One that goes all the way back to Brown &amp; Root and LBJ. Yes, the same B&amp;R that is now in bed with the Bushes. See, big money really doesn&#8217;t care who is in the WH, just as long as they are partial to big money&#8217;s interests. Back in the day, B&amp;R gave $5K to every employee with the caveat they donate it to good ol&#8217; LBJ&#8217;s senate campaign. When the tax man cometh looking for his cut of the $5K, the employees began to sing like canaries. Hence the law.</p>
<p>As far as Mr. Earle is concerned, I doubt seriously he&#8217;s &#8220;Earle have come up through the ranks of their respective parties by successfully playing as close to the edge of the law that ethics and decency will allow, all the while â€œAw Shucksâ€-ing and backslapping their way through successful election campaigns. It is the campaigns themselves with the ungodly amounts of money raised and spent that grease the skids of law and politics at the statehouse level.&#8221; From what I know he&#8217;s a hard-nosed lawyer who has a strong disdain for ANYONE who breaks the law. He&#8217;s not a big-time politico like DeLay. And, of the 15 political indictments he&#8217;s brought forth, 12 have been against democrats, including the sitting Speaker of the Texas House, Gib Lewis (who resigned and pleaded down to two misdemeanors and hasn&#8217;t been heard from since) and the sitting Attorney General, Jim Maddox.</p>
<p>Here is what Earle has to say about the LAW in Texas: &#8220;Texas law makes it a felony for corporations and labor unions to make political contributions to campaigns. The punishment is two to ten years in the penitentiary.&#8221;</p>
<p>And, as far as &#8220;big money&#8221; campaigns go, PBS.org reports the average cost of a state-house campaign in Texas is $85,000. I&#8217;m guessing the DA race in Travis County wouldn&#8217;t go much over $100K even in this day and age. Don&#8217;t take my word for it, go check it out yourself at <a href="http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript324_full.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript324_full.html</a>. And, while you are at it, there is another great article on this mess at: <a href="http://www.texasobserver.org/showArticle.asp?ArticleFileName=030829_f1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.texasobserver.org/showArticle.asp?ArticleFileName=030829_f1.htm</a>.</p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Koenecke</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/09/29/hunting-repubwicans/comment-page-1/#comment-71397</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Koenecke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 21:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=803#comment-71397</guid>
		<description>Regarding bartcop's comment: Ronnie Earle is 63 years old, and his indictments of Democrats date back to some years ago when the Democratic Party owned Texas. He brought a similar indictment against Kay Bailey Huchinson shortly after she was elected, which was quickly dismissed as being without merit.

I'm no fan of Tom Delay, and admit it's certainly possible he has done unethical and/or illegal things, but this particular dog won't hunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding bartcop&#8217;s comment: Ronnie Earle is 63 years old, and his indictments of Democrats date back to some years ago when the Democratic Party owned Texas. He brought a similar indictment against Kay Bailey Huchinson shortly after she was elected, which was quickly dismissed as being without merit.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m no fan of Tom Delay, and admit it&#8217;s certainly possible he has done unethical and/or illegal things, but this particular dog won&#8217;t hunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
