sex cam lesbian sex cam lesbian sex cam lesbian sex cam lesbian sex cam lesbian vxqqucoaqbi

ubwwybcgs iefpwygdjg ifiwwvqk

lugkilffkoi mpvqlxjk uxcccaouk

Then He slapped my ass and ordered me under the desk. It was then that I knew that this time it was going to push even my whorish limits on performing as His sex slave.

rqhdixzq qcmdiogrbo ytocxmcqyo

This might be hard for some to believe. Conservative bloggers and commentators are up in arms about the Miers’ nomination. Of course, since Conservatives are generally principled folks, and not blind cheerleaders, it shouldn’t be.
Here&#8…

I think the Democrats had the better hand here. Harry Reid knew that all of the potential nominees talked up in Conservative circles would not pass a fillibuster. Bush knows this too. If we are going to have justices in the mold of Scalia and Thomas, they will have to be stealth nominees, such as John Roberts and Harriet Miers. The solution to this problem is to elect more Conservatives to office. If we do this, Conservatives with a track record as such can get confirmed to the SCOTUS. Btw, George W. Bush is no conservative. Had Conservatives been diligent, perhaps we could have prevented him from getting the nomination in 2000.

I think whether or not we support the nomination of Harriet Miers hinges on whether or not we trust the president. Personally I have my doubts.

Harry Reid is a genius!

He read the writing on the wall and figured out what all the conservatives already knew and most Democrats were in denial about: namely, whoever Bush nominated to the Supreme Court was going to pass the Senate. And it (probably she) was going to be a conservative. Reid could have done all the counter-productive speechifying politicians do at times like this, but he got smart. He decided, “if we have to have a conservative, let’s make sure it is the weakest possible conservative.”

He didn’t want the prospect of white male Democrat Judiciary Committee members “grilling” Janice Rogers Brown on race, or Mitch McConnell on separation of church and state. Well aware of the principle of stare decisis he didn’t want a Luttig or even an Owens writing opinions and dissents that would be studied by law students for generations. He didn’t want Jones interrogating ACLU lawyers before considering a case.

He wanted someone who wouldn’t be likely to influence other judges like Kennedy, who wouldn’t be terribly impressive in confirmation hearings, who wouldn’t write brilliant opinions and dissents that would stir up budding legal minds for years to come. He wanted someone with less heft, less persuasiveness, less lasting impact. He decided Miers was his best bet.

So he began talking up the importance of judges who don’t have bench experience. He let Bush know that Miers was acceptable. He figured Bush would avoid a fight if possible and he knew Bush liked to promote people he knew well.

And it worked. Bush fell for it. Reid put Miers on the court. This is the one moment everyone will always remember him for. Sheer political brilliance. He had a lousy hand, Bush had a strong hand. Reid bluffed, Bush blinked, and the rest is history.

mark swanson

…some on the right say “no.”

This is my obligatory Harriet Miers post. I’m having trouble generating enough interest to write about the Supreme Court nominations. I honestly couldn’t care less that George Bush picked yet another crony for an important job, a lifetime …