<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IN GEORGE WE TRUST?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/10/in-george-we-trust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/10/in-george-we-trust/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 15:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/10/in-george-we-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-91469</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=818#comment-91469</guid>
		<description>[...] p from October 14th: Council Posts Controversy, Christians, and Condemnation - Wallo World In George We Trust? - Right Wing Nut House Dumb Liberal Tricks - The Strata- [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] p from October 14th: Council Posts Controversy, Christians, and Condemnation - Wallo World In George We Trust? - Right Wing Nut House Dumb Liberal Tricks - The Strata- [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NIF</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/10/in-george-we-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-82250</link>
		<dc:creator>NIF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=818#comment-82250</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Shizno&lt;/strong&gt;

Today's dose of NIF - News, Interesting &#38; Funny ... It's Kerry-180 Tuesday</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Shizno</strong></p>
<p>Today&#8217;s dose of NIF - News, Interesting &amp; Funny &#8230; It&#8217;s Kerry-180 Tuesday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New World Man - it's got wires that vibrate</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/10/in-george-we-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-81303</link>
		<dc:creator>New World Man - it's got wires that vibrate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=818#comment-81303</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Watcher's Council best posts week ending October 13&lt;/strong&gt;

The Watcher's Council selected these best posts from among those nominated for the week ending October 13. Wallo World's fine Controversy, Christians and Condemnation won, the second week in a row a tiebreaker was slung around to settle things. Bill ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Watcher&#8217;s Council best posts week ending October 13</strong></p>
<p>The Watcher&#8217;s Council selected these best posts from among those nominated for the week ending October 13. Wallo World&#8217;s fine Controversy, Christians and Condemnation won, the second week in a row a tiebreaker was slung around to settle things. Bill &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Assistant Village Idiot</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/10/in-george-we-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-80192</link>
		<dc:creator>Assistant Village Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 22:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=818#comment-80192</guid>
		<description>@BBoot -- (yawn) got anything we haven't refuted 100 times before?

The country did not vote for "the candidate the conservatives liked," however much we may have worked for him as the best available alternative.  They voted for George W Bush, for a variety of reasons.  We have told the Democrats for the past 5 years that the president has the presumption of acceptance for his judicial nominees to any court, because he got elected and their guy didn't, and that's the way the "Advise and Consent" part of the Constitution works.  So now we take our medicine.  I don't like the Miers nomination, and I don't mind saying so.  But I signed on for this president, and I take what I asked for.

Please remember, that despite what the MSM says, not only is the war in Iraq going well, the entire WOT is going well.  There is not only significant progress in Afghanistan and Iraq, there are situations which are encouraging in Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Pakistan, North Korea, Bahrain, Ukraine, Qatar, and even such hopeless places as China.  If we look at the larger picture and not the day-to-day, the slow, wincing, turn of the world could not realistically be much better,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BBoot &#8212; (yawn) got anything we haven&#8217;t refuted 100 times before?</p>
<p>The country did not vote for &#8220;the candidate the conservatives liked,&#8221; however much we may have worked for him as the best available alternative.  They voted for George W Bush, for a variety of reasons.  We have told the Democrats for the past 5 years that the president has the presumption of acceptance for his judicial nominees to any court, because he got elected and their guy didn&#8217;t, and that&#8217;s the way the &#8220;Advise and Consent&#8221; part of the Constitution works.  So now we take our medicine.  I don&#8217;t like the Miers nomination, and I don&#8217;t mind saying so.  But I signed on for this president, and I take what I asked for.</p>
<p>Please remember, that despite what the MSM says, not only is the war in Iraq going well, the entire WOT is going well.  There is not only significant progress in Afghanistan and Iraq, there are situations which are encouraging in Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Pakistan, North Korea, Bahrain, Ukraine, Qatar, and even such hopeless places as China.  If we look at the larger picture and not the day-to-day, the slow, wincing, turn of the world could not realistically be much better,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; The Council has spoken!</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/10/in-george-we-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-80012</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; The Council has spoken!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=818#comment-80012</guid>
		<description>[...] estion whether sheâ€™s â€œreallyâ€ a Christian? I think not.&#8221;  	In second place was Right Wing Nut House&#8217;s post on the Miers nomination, &#8220;In George  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] estion whether sheâ€™s â€œreallyâ€ a Christian? I think not.&#8221;  	In second place was Right Wing Nut House&#8217;s post on the Miers nomination, &#8220;In George  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; The Council Has Spoken!</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/10/in-george-we-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-79994</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; The Council Has Spoken!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=818#comment-79994</guid>
		<description>[...] as Controversy, Christians, and Condemnation by Wallo World, with second place going to In George We Trust? by Right Wing Nut House. 	In the Non Council Category the w [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Controversy, Christians, and Condemnation by Wallo World, with second place going to In George We Trust? by Right Wing Nut House. 	In the Non Council Category the w [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/10/in-george-we-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-79974</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=818#comment-79974</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Council Has Spoken!&lt;/strong&gt;

First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; the winning entries in the Watcher's Council vote for this week are Controversy, Christians, and Conde...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Council Has Spoken!</strong></p>
<p>First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; the winning entries in the Watcher&#8217;s Council vote for this week are Controversy, Christians, and Conde&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/10/in-george-we-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-78739</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 05:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=818#comment-78739</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Submitted for Your Approval&lt;/strong&gt;

First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher's Council for this week's vote. Council li...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Submitted for Your Approval</strong></p>
<p>First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council for this week&#8217;s vote. Council li&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moran</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/10/in-george-we-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-78492</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=818#comment-78492</guid>
		<description>No choice Tom...either that or stay home which will elect people who could do very serious mischeif to this country - especially overseas and in the homeland security area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No choice Tom&#8230;either that or stay home which will elect people who could do very serious mischeif to this country - especially overseas and in the homeland security area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Der Tommissar</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/10/in-george-we-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-78491</link>
		<dc:creator>Der Tommissar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=818#comment-78491</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;When it comes right down to it, pragmatic conservatives have very little choice. Itâ€™s not like theyâ€™re going to abandon Republicans and vote Democratic. And it is probable that, with a little coaxing, they can be made to come out and support Republicans in 2006. Indeed, as Democratic prospects have improved over the summer, it will become vital come election time that these same conservatives not sit on their hands and refuse to take part â€“ not with the possible takeover of the Senate, or the House, or both by Democrats in the offing.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;

Isn't this a highbrow way of saying, "Come out and vote Republican but don't expect to get anything for it"?&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>When it comes right down to it, pragmatic conservatives have very little choice. Itâ€™s not like theyâ€™re going to abandon Republicans and vote Democratic. And it is probable that, with a little coaxing, they can be made to come out and support Republicans in 2006. Indeed, as Democratic prospects have improved over the summer, it will become vital come election time that these same conservatives not sit on their hands and refuse to take part â€“ not with the possible takeover of the Senate, or the House, or both by Democrats in the offing.</em><em></p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this a highbrow way of saying, &#8220;Come out and vote Republican but don&#8217;t expect to get anything for it&#8221;?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
