<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CIA VS. THE WHITE HOUSE: IT WAS THE ELECTION, STUPID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/17/cia-vs-the-white-house-it-was-the-election-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/17/cia-vs-the-white-house-it-was-the-election-stupid/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 06:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing Nut House &#187; CIA VS. THE WHITE HOUSE: A STUDY OF INCOMPETENCE:  Politics served up with a smile&#8230; And a stilletto.</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/17/cia-vs-the-white-house-it-was-the-election-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-87090</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing Nut House &#187; CIA VS. THE WHITE HOUSE: A STUDY OF INCOMPETENCE:  Politics served up with a smile&#8230; And a stilletto.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=830#comment-87090</guid>
		<description>[...]  	ABLE DANGER (10) 	Bird Flu (4) 	Blogging (50) 	Books (5) 	CARNIVAL OF THE CLUELESS (38) 	CIA VS. THE WHITE H [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  	ABLE DANGER (10) 	Bird Flu (4) 	Blogging (50) 	Books (5) 	CARNIVAL OF THE CLUELESS (38) 	CIA VS. THE WHITE H [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/17/cia-vs-the-white-house-it-was-the-election-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-85728</link>
		<dc:creator>George Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=830#comment-85728</guid>
		<description>On October 17, you wrote, "It appears that Libby is a typical 'Washingtonienne'..." That would make Libby a female. '-ien' is masculine, and '-ienne.' is feminine.
   Now, I hate the French as much as the next guy, but shouldn't we get it right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On October 17, you wrote, &#8220;It appears that Libby is a typical &#8216;Washingtonienne&#8217;&#8230;&#8221; That would make Libby a female. &#8216;-ien&#8217; is masculine, and &#8216;-ienne.&#8217; is feminine.<br />
   Now, I hate the French as much as the next guy, but shouldn&#8217;t we get it right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WILLisms.com</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/17/cia-vs-the-white-house-it-was-the-election-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-82337</link>
		<dc:creator>WILLisms.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=830#comment-82337</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Some Call It A Bonfire (Or Carnival) Of Classiness....&lt;/strong&gt;

We call it "Classiness, All Around Us." Click to explore more WILLisms.com. In no particular order, WILLisms.com presents classiness from the blogosphere: 1. Agenda Journalism- Angry in the Great White North blog explains the difference between http:...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Some Call It A Bonfire (Or Carnival) Of Classiness&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>We call it &#8220;Classiness, All Around Us.&#8221; Click to explore more WILLisms.com. In no particular order, WILLisms.com presents classiness from the blogosphere: 1. Agenda Journalism- Angry in the Great White North blog explains the difference between http:&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moran</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/17/cia-vs-the-white-house-it-was-the-election-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-82185</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=830#comment-82185</guid>
		<description>Only:

Special Prosecutors don't investigate something for two years and then walk away without indicting someone big. They have to justify the cost of their investigation somehow.

Remember Ollie North?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only:</p>
<p>Special Prosecutors don&#8217;t investigate something for two years and then walk away without indicting someone big. They have to justify the cost of their investigation somehow.</p>
<p>Remember Ollie North?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red State Rant</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/17/cia-vs-the-white-house-it-was-the-election-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-81837</link>
		<dc:creator>Red State Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=830#comment-81837</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bits and pieces&lt;/strong&gt;

"Priests of perpetual perfection:" No improvements are good enough for progressives.

OK to praise Che, but not to bury him. Cafe Press censors a T-shirt.

The CIA and partisan politics: Plame-gate was a naked power grap, says Rick Moran, by CIA ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bits and pieces</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;Priests of perpetual perfection:&#8221; No improvements are good enough for progressives.</p>
<p>OK to praise Che, but not to bury him. Cafe Press censors a T-shirt.</p>
<p>The CIA and partisan politics: Plame-gate was a naked power grap, says Rick Moran, by CIA &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlyaguy</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/17/cia-vs-the-white-house-it-was-the-election-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-81782</link>
		<dc:creator>onlyaguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=830#comment-81782</guid>
		<description>I think that expecting an indictment of either Rove or Libby is not only premature, but simply not likely.  I'm more inclined to believe that Fitzgerald is simply covering all the bases, to make sure he cannot be criticized for wasting money, or being sloppy.  He has to make sure all the details are nailed down and that there are no questions left unanswered, especially if he already knows he won't produce any indictments.

If anyone at the top of the Bush administration was guilty of "outing a CIA covert operative" (ludicrous on it's face), or obstructing justice, I expect they would have thrown themselves on their sword long ago, rather than suffering the embarrassment of waiting to see if Fitzgerald could come with enough evidence for an indictment.  

I'm amazed that respected voices like Bill O'Reilly have leaned toward the belief that there is complicity on the part of Rove, Libby, or anyone else at the top.  We will however, know within the next couple of weeks, if I should eat my hat, or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that expecting an indictment of either Rove or Libby is not only premature, but simply not likely.  I&#8217;m more inclined to believe that Fitzgerald is simply covering all the bases, to make sure he cannot be criticized for wasting money, or being sloppy.  He has to make sure all the details are nailed down and that there are no questions left unanswered, especially if he already knows he won&#8217;t produce any indictments.</p>
<p>If anyone at the top of the Bush administration was guilty of &#8220;outing a CIA covert operative&#8221; (ludicrous on it&#8217;s face), or obstructing justice, I expect they would have thrown themselves on their sword long ago, rather than suffering the embarrassment of waiting to see if Fitzgerald could come with enough evidence for an indictment.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m amazed that respected voices like Bill O&#8217;Reilly have leaned toward the belief that there is complicity on the part of Rove, Libby, or anyone else at the top.  We will however, know within the next couple of weeks, if I should eat my hat, or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/10/17/cia-vs-the-white-house-it-was-the-election-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-81730</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=830#comment-81730</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rove grilled on CIA leak conflicts&lt;/strong&gt;

The grand jury investigating the CIA leak case pressed White House senior adviser Karl Rove Friday t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rove grilled on CIA leak conflicts</strong></p>
<p>The grand jury investigating the CIA leak case pressed White House senior adviser Karl Rove Friday t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
