<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IRAQ: CHANGING STRATEGY FOR CHANGING TIMES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/11/30/iraq-changing-strategy-for-changing-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/11/30/iraq-changing-strategy-for-changing-times/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 03:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spider</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/11/30/iraq-changing-strategy-for-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-922523</link>
		<dc:creator>Spider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=913#comment-922523</guid>
		<description>Very interesting reading this one year later. 

I wonder if all the myopic Bush supporters are still as cnvinced that invading Iraq and diverting resources from the fight against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan/Pakistan/Wajiristan etc was appropriate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting reading this one year later. </p>
<p>I wonder if all the myopic Bush supporters are still as cnvinced that invading Iraq and diverting resources from the fight against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan/Pakistan/Wajiristan etc was appropriate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyTremaine</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/11/30/iraq-changing-strategy-for-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-103841</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyTremaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 01:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=913#comment-103841</guid>
		<description>Um, Mike, last I checked the Democrats cannot in any way force a withdrawal.  They are the minority party in both the Senate and the House.  The only way U.S. troops will withdraw from Iraq is if the President as Commander in Chief orders it, or if the GOP majority in Congress votes to pull military funding for the war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Mike, last I checked the Democrats cannot in any way force a withdrawal.  They are the minority party in both the Senate and the House.  The only way U.S. troops will withdraw from Iraq is if the President as Commander in Chief orders it, or if the GOP majority in Congress votes to pull military funding for the war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike's America</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/11/30/iraq-changing-strategy-for-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-103736</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike's America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 05:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=913#comment-103736</guid>
		<description>Special Report with Brit Hume on Fox News aired an interesting report by Brett Baier where he cut President Bush's Victory Strategy speech in with statements and reports from Iraq documenting the progress cited by the President.

We are winning this war and the only way we could lose it is if Democrats succeed in forcing a hasty withdrawal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Special Report with Brit Hume on Fox News aired an interesting report by Brett Baier where he cut President Bush&#8217;s Victory Strategy speech in with statements and reports from Iraq documenting the progress cited by the President.</p>
<p>We are winning this war and the only way we could lose it is if Democrats succeed in forcing a hasty withdrawal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/11/30/iraq-changing-strategy-for-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-103690</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 01:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=913#comment-103690</guid>
		<description>Sigh Harlan.  You said, "How do you lose a war to a country with no real government or military."

Let's examine what you're saying exactly:

"How do you lose a war..."  Um, we won the war. We defeated Iraq.  The war we're in now is a different war and not against any country; and it is still ongoing, so we haven't lost it.

"...to a country with no real government or military."  Iraq does have a government and military.  They are our allies.  The people we are fighting are a few remaining elements of the old regime, but most are imported Arab terrorists.

So, nothing in your statement is in any way factual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh Harlan.  You said, &#8220;How do you lose a war to a country with no real government or military.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s examine what you&#8217;re saying exactly:</p>
<p>&#8220;How do you lose a war&#8230;&#8221;  Um, we won the war. We defeated Iraq.  The war we&#8217;re in now is a different war and not against any country; and it is still ongoing, so we haven&#8217;t lost it.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;to a country with no real government or military.&#8221;  Iraq does have a government and military.  They are our allies.  The people we are fighting are a few remaining elements of the old regime, but most are imported Arab terrorists.</p>
<p>So, nothing in your statement is in any way factual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harlan James</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/11/30/iraq-changing-strategy-for-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-103649</link>
		<dc:creator>Harlan James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=913#comment-103649</guid>
		<description>Andrew: As I said, "...a country with no government or military." What would you like me to call Iraq, a bran muffin?

Words have meaning, Andrew. put down the woodblocks and check out a dictionary some day. 

Besides, didn't Donald Rumsfeld warn you about the use of the word "insurgency?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew: As I said, &#8220;&#8230;a country with no government or military.&#8221; What would you like me to call Iraq, a bran muffin?</p>
<p>Words have meaning, Andrew. put down the woodblocks and check out a dictionary some day. </p>
<p>Besides, didn&#8217;t Donald Rumsfeld warn you about the use of the word &#8220;insurgency?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjg</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/11/30/iraq-changing-strategy-for-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-103586</link>
		<dc:creator>cjg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=913#comment-103586</guid>
		<description>I imagine the writer of the post
not knowing America and it's allies are fighting a terrorist
organisation other than a country
thinks we should have a real 
enemy with a real country.
Sorry, we only have terrorists from many countries to deal with.
Maybe we could have a summitt
of terrorists,  and get them to
sign some sort of "plan" to bring
peace to the ME.
Sure, that would work, don't ya
think? It is too bad we can't find them to send an invitation
to the Peace Sumitt.
Well, maybe next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine the writer of the post<br />
not knowing America and it&#8217;s allies are fighting a terrorist<br />
organisation other than a country<br />
thinks we should have a real<br />
enemy with a real country.<br />
Sorry, we only have terrorists from many countries to deal with.<br />
Maybe we could have a summitt<br />
of terrorists,  and get them to<br />
sign some sort of &#8220;plan&#8221; to bring<br />
peace to the ME.<br />
Sure, that would work, don&#8217;t ya<br />
think? It is too bad we can&#8217;t find them to send an invitation<br />
to the Peace Sumitt.<br />
Well, maybe next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/11/30/iraq-changing-strategy-for-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-103574</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=913#comment-103574</guid>
		<description>Harlan, that shows your complete ignorance of insurgency warfare.  The fact that you think we're at war with a country is very telling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harlan, that shows your complete ignorance of insurgency warfare.  The fact that you think we&#8217;re at war with a country is very telling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harlan James</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/11/30/iraq-changing-strategy-for-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-103533</link>
		<dc:creator>Harlan James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=913#comment-103533</guid>
		<description>Q) How do you lose a war to a country with no real government or military?

A) Put George W. Bush in charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q) How do you lose a war to a country with no real government or military?</p>
<p>A) Put George W. Bush in charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/11/30/iraq-changing-strategy-for-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-103524</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=913#comment-103524</guid>
		<description>The biggest problem the Bush administration has always had is their poor communication.  This is not confined to just the President, who obviously isn't a great public speaker, but to the administration as a whole.  They are a very secretive and I don't think it has served them well.  Had they come out from the beginning and been more open and honest about the course of the war, I seriously doubt public opinion on the war would have eroded as much as it has.  Even I, who is well versed with what is going on in Iraq, was confused by some of the junk, generalized information the White House was giving out. I just hope this new willingness to explain and keep the average American informed is not too little too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem the Bush administration has always had is their poor communication.  This is not confined to just the President, who obviously isn&#8217;t a great public speaker, but to the administration as a whole.  They are a very secretive and I don&#8217;t think it has served them well.  Had they come out from the beginning and been more open and honest about the course of the war, I seriously doubt public opinion on the war would have eroded as much as it has.  Even I, who is well versed with what is going on in Iraq, was confused by some of the junk, generalized information the White House was giving out. I just hope this new willingness to explain and keep the average American informed is not too little too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Miss Attila</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/11/30/iraq-changing-strategy-for-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-103511</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Miss Attila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/?p=913#comment-103511</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Timetables vs. Checklists&lt;/strong&gt;

Well, one of those telegraphs our intentions to the enemy, and encourages the insurgency to keep going because "help is on the way." The other is a realistic, hardheaded way to foster Iraqi independence. Rightwing Nuthouse parses out an AP...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Timetables vs. Checklists</strong></p>
<p>Well, one of those telegraphs our intentions to the enemy, and encourages the insurgency to keep going because &#8220;help is on the way.&#8221; The other is a realistic, hardheaded way to foster Iraqi independence. Rightwing Nuthouse parses out an AP&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
