Comments on: HOW CAN YOU TOP “OVER THE TOP?”

By: Steve

Steve — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:10:56 +0000

Ann Coulter is about mediocrity. She is about appealing to the lowest common denominator and nothing else. No one ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the average person and Ann Coulter proves this.

By: Lavoretto natale.

Lavoretto natale. — Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:36:10 +0000

Lavoretto natale.

Lavoretto natale.

By: :: SOTUblog

:: SOTUblog — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:18:03 +0000

[...] So how did the audience respond to such hateful and violent language? Glenn Greenwald says: According to one of her blogging fans in attendance, 5,000 "conservatives" reverently sat there and listened to her and did nothing to indicate disapproval. To the contrary, her urging of violence against "ragheads" specifically "prompted a boisterous ovation." RightWingNutHouse reports that her speech was "well received by the audience." [...]

By: victor williams

victor williams — Sat, 01 Jul 2006 00:36:04 +0000

how can you tell an A Rab has become an adult?
you take the diaper off his ass and put it on his head!!!

By: reverse_vampyr

reverse_vampyr — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:57:35 +0000

Two tokes over the line

Ann Coulter is one of conservatism’s loudest voices. And unfortunately, she’s used it last Friday to behave like an ass (as in Democrat) while speaking at CPAC. I’m outraged with Lefty nuts make comments like that about President Bush. And I’m just…

By: Ragout Head

Ragout Head — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:25:10 +0000

Hey, great blog! Visit my blog Ragouthead Paradise for a really good time! Most of you seem really, really sensitive–I mean REALLY REALLY SENSITIVE!!!! You’ll love my place, come on over.

By: John Mack

John Mack — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:42:49 +0000

Wonderful point about why Coulter has to act crazy. It is hard to believe (but true) that she has a good legal mind, that she was on Michigan Law Review, that she made a significant contribution to both the Paula Jones case and the Florida recount controversy. If she had wanted to, she could have been a first-rate right wing commentator, perhaps ala George Will, perhaps ala the Volokh Conspiracy. The problem is that once one has developed a reputation for lunacy, there is no going back even if one wants to (and there is no indication that she does — but she will). The National Review and the Weekly Standard won’t touch her. If she tried to change her tone, she would lose her following (and her $30,000 “lecture” fees). What’s left? Genuine trouble, that’s what.

By: MLK II

MLK II — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:34:17 +0000

Let’s see, Arab’s are “Caucasoid”, er… white - so Ann’s comment, technically, wasn’t racist. She called radical-islamists, ‘ragheads’. Once again, calling the enemy a bad name; again another non-starter. I guess the issue really becomes, how afraid and spineless are rightwing bloggers. Who cares what the MSM/left/Saddam says about the right. They are never going to stop their vitriol and hatred.

I mean, if there’s no racism, why take Ann to task? If she’s over the top, then why pay her any attention? Is it because she considers blogging a joke thereby pissing you guys off? Malkin calls the bad guys “bastard”, and Maron calls a subset “crazed” - and they all can rationalize the name-calling. But, when Ann does it, it’s bad, over the top, makes the right look bad to the left. And we canâ€™t have you rightwing bloggers look bad in front of the left.

“QUICK! Be the first to condemn Ann to separate yourself as a “true” conservative”. Please. Truly intelligent people can distinguish derision placed on one subset even if the term applies to both good and bad subsets.

Case in point, do all white people get pissed when their southern counterpart is called â€˜redneckâ€™?

By: rightwingprof

rightwingprof — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:50:30 +0000

I see even the right is bowing to PC nonsense. Of course she’s over the top. That’s what she does. That’s why we like her. You folks badly need to get an enema.

By: Rick Johnson

Rick Johnson — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:24:14 +0000

I see Ann’s comments as the first punch n the much needed push back at the craven posture of CNN and it’s fellow travelers and “sensitive” types.The war has come to us and to castigate Ann for her over the topness is a form of denial of that war.In a war there is room for the courageous in-your-face type of oratory that Ann is so good at.REJ