Comments on: IMPEACHMENT BANDWAGON STARTS TO ROLL

By: Stephen F. Johnston

Stephen F. Johnston — Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:55:49 +0000

Wow, First I think everyone of has forgotten that impeachment is a process to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused. Bush et al would be tried and maybe found innocent maybe found guilty. No President has yet been put out of office thru impeachment, thought Nixon probably would have been. Several of your comments about liberals indicate a lucid thought is the furthest thing from your mind, and in fact your lack there of. You may disagree w/ liberal thoughts, that doesn’t mean they are ill thought and not lucid. Finally, unfortuntately there are grounds for impeachment. Article VI says treaties are the highest law of the land. Bush disobyed against this treaty when he invaded, period. You may feel he did the right thing, it was still illegal and therefore grounds for impeachment (the process, not necessarily being actually kicked out of office). I could go on there are many more of his actions that need to be investigate. However, my point is made.

By: Mescalero

Mescalero — Wed, 01 Mar 2006 04:34:40 +0000

Anything originating from the racist Conyers has got to be nothing other than laughing matter. Unfortunately, the Jews as well as others know differently, and it’s not laughing matter at all — it’s Naziism all over again! Conyers is heavily funded by the Islamo-Fascist Congress for American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), and that says it all! John Conyers has a long and well-known atagonism towards Jews, as do Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. The problem is that the corrupt American mainstream media can’t figure that out — only the blogs have the guts to bring out the facts!

By: 10ksnooker

10ksnooker — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:44:37 +0000

They should have called off the revolution, only about 1/3 of the population wanted any part of it, only about 5% actually did something.

When you get polls like the cbs one, I got to ask … what does cbs do again?

By: john ryan

john ryan — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:05:01 +0000

well chickens usually do come home to roost.Today’s moon-bat may be tommorrow’s realist. Divisive politics may be successfull in the short term but it really isn’t good for the country long term. The fickle American voter has turned against the Iraq mission. Can we hope to achieve success when the population does not support the endeavor ?

By: The Jawa Report

The Jawa Report — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:16:54 +0000

Islam Means Peace (Doesn’t it?)

72 White Grapes for all! “Moderate” Muslim leader speaks: Islam means war. Senior al Qaeda asshole captured in Iraq. Evan Kohlmann is skeptical. Meanwhile, escaped al Qaeda bad guy vows attacks on U.S. soil. Former Taliban official in U.S., studying…

By: Small Town Veteran

Small Town Veteran — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:17:41 +0000

The Impeachment Bandwagon Starts To Roll

… Elections have consequences, people. If the GOP still controls the House after November the moonbats can howl all they want to but they still won’t be any less powerless than they are right now. Don’t forget to vote.

By: Fred Fry

Fred Fry — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:49:39 +0000

When is Conyers going to account for the turkeys his staff stole last year?

“If the Democrats take the House in November, they can pretty much do whatever they please up to and including opening impeachment hearings in the Judiciary Committee.”
- Let them keep thinking that this is posible. The shock the day after will all the more amusing. (Coupled with accusations that the polls said….)

By: The MaryHunter

The MaryHunter — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:00:41 +0000

I’m embarassed to say that I can attest to your praise of Lapham’s writing ability, Rick. I confess to having actually (urp) subscribed to Harper’s Ragazine for the better part of my graduate student life. Youth, heh.

I survived, though, a flamin’ conservative no less.

By: R.G. Lacsamana

R.G. Lacsamana — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:45:20 +0000

This is about as ridiculous at it gets. While I agree that Lapham may be a good essayist, his suggestion of impeaching President Bush on the basis of John Conyers’ crazy musings will not go anywhere and raises questions about his integrity. He may be an intellectual, as you say, but that’s not saying much when so many of them, particularly those on the left, harbor such outrageous ideas. The prospect of the Democrats taking the House in 2006, which is doubtful, would not necessarily stir them to do what Laphan is contemplating. Americans would overwhelmingly reject something as absurd as this, unless Democrats want to keep shooting themselves in the foot. Lapham, in the sunset of his years, ought not to go out a bitter man and should stick to writing those long, rambling essays. Embracing the dirty politics of the Democrats would make him look like an unscrupulous scumbag.

By: Mark H.

Mark H. — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:40:44 +0000

“More importantly, the power of the legislative branch would be increased enormously if it was a given…”

We’ll end up with a long string of “President Jellyfishs,” unfortunately, they’ll be happy with that result, right up until the lights go out, then it’ll be too late.