<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASA: THE LITTLE AGENCY THAT CAN&#8217;T</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/02/nasa-the-little-agency-that-cant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/02/nasa-the-little-agency-that-cant/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 14:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phenyx</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/02/nasa-the-little-agency-that-cant/comment-page-1/#comment-448934</link>
		<dc:creator>Phenyx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/02/nasa-the-little-agency-that-cant/#comment-448934</guid>
		<description>Ogre:  Let me explain it to you like this then.  You get a pay raise of 3.2%, however you have to pay out the equivilant of 5% in expenditures before you even see the check, let alone get to spend on the things you would rather put money toward.  Kinda seems like a paycut don't it?  That's what NASA is dealing with.

scraprion:  Oh Grow The Hell UP!  There is no way you can lay the failed missions of NASA at the feet of liberals.  What a moron.  You want to blame American educational institutions?  You might as well lay the right amount of blame at the feet of conservative administrations and politicians who don't want to fund anything that dosen't have an immediate fiscal benefit.  There is plenty blame to go all around, bub.  No, here's the rub.  Most of it isn't the fault of anone 

Yes, NASA had great success flying to the moon, but it didn't come w/o fatalities.  Three in fact.  It wasn't flawless either.  It was also the equivilant of walking across the street in your nice quiet residential neighborhood.

The missions they are flying now are more like crossing an 8 lane in the middle of the day, and doing it w/o actually being able to see the traffic that might hit you.

The Scientists and Engineers at NASA are as bright and capable as they were back in the day with a whole lot more infrmation and technology to work with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ogre:  Let me explain it to you like this then.  You get a pay raise of 3.2%, however you have to pay out the equivilant of 5% in expenditures before you even see the check, let alone get to spend on the things you would rather put money toward.  Kinda seems like a paycut don&#8217;t it?  That&#8217;s what NASA is dealing with.</p>
<p>scraprion:  Oh Grow The Hell UP!  There is no way you can lay the failed missions of NASA at the feet of liberals.  What a moron.  You want to blame American educational institutions?  You might as well lay the right amount of blame at the feet of conservative administrations and politicians who don&#8217;t want to fund anything that dosen&#8217;t have an immediate fiscal benefit.  There is plenty blame to go all around, bub.  No, here&#8217;s the rub.  Most of it isn&#8217;t the fault of anone </p>
<p>Yes, NASA had great success flying to the moon, but it didn&#8217;t come w/o fatalities.  Three in fact.  It wasn&#8217;t flawless either.  It was also the equivilant of walking across the street in your nice quiet residential neighborhood.</p>
<p>The missions they are flying now are more like crossing an 8 lane in the middle of the day, and doing it w/o actually being able to see the traffic that might hit you.</p>
<p>The Scientists and Engineers at NASA are as bright and capable as they were back in the day with a whole lot more infrmation and technology to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scraprion</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/02/nasa-the-little-agency-that-cant/comment-page-1/#comment-152578</link>
		<dc:creator>scraprion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 04:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/02/nasa-the-little-agency-that-cant/#comment-152578</guid>
		<description>No amount of money will help the NASA of today. The previous generation had all kinds of success in space travel and research but they were educated in schools that were not ran by the left wing liberals. The so called engineer's and scientist working there today (and responsible for a host of failures and deaths) are all from the failed education system of the PC crowd. Can't make the grade, pass them along anyway, you can't hurt their feelings. All they have accomplished is to make failures of most of the graduates and put the real meaning in a degree. BS truly stand for BS, MS stands for More sh** and PHD is simply Piled Higher and Deeper. They have a piece of paper that states they attended some major college but they missed the education part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No amount of money will help the NASA of today. The previous generation had all kinds of success in space travel and research but they were educated in schools that were not ran by the left wing liberals. The so called engineer&#8217;s and scientist working there today (and responsible for a host of failures and deaths) are all from the failed education system of the PC crowd. Can&#8217;t make the grade, pass them along anyway, you can&#8217;t hurt their feelings. All they have accomplished is to make failures of most of the graduates and put the real meaning in a degree. BS truly stand for BS, MS stands for More sh** and PHD is simply Piled Higher and Deeper. They have a piece of paper that states they attended some major college but they missed the education part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogre</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/02/nasa-the-little-agency-that-cant/comment-page-1/#comment-152493</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 19:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/02/nasa-the-little-agency-that-cant/#comment-152493</guid>
		<description>Hey, I like NASA, but I am the only one who reads statements like these:
"The cuts come to $3 billion over the next five years, even as NASAâ€™s overall spending grows by 3.2 percent this year"
and just pretty much ignore any complaints?  If they're getting 3.2% MORE than they had, only in government-land can that possibly be considered a "cut."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I like NASA, but I am the only one who reads statements like these:<br />
&#8220;The cuts come to $3 billion over the next five years, even as NASAâ€™s overall spending grows by 3.2 percent this year&#8221;<br />
and just pretty much ignore any complaints?  If they&#8217;re getting 3.2% MORE than they had, only in government-land can that possibly be considered a &#8220;cut.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
