<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TRIAL BALLOON FOR IRAQ PULLOUT?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 10:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Blog For All</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/comment-page-1/#comment-153323</link>
		<dc:creator>A Blog For All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 23:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/#comment-153323</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;US Bugging Out of Iraq By 2007? Not So Fast&lt;/strong&gt;

The facts on the ground should determine this, not some politicized reporting. The Iraqi security forces have to be capable of dealing with the situation, and they are doing a far better job than the media acknowledges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>US Bugging Out of Iraq By 2007? Not So Fast</strong></p>
<p>The facts on the ground should determine this, not some politicized reporting. The Iraqi security forces have to be capable of dealing with the situation, and they are doing a far better job than the media acknowledges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike20169</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/comment-page-1/#comment-153322</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike20169</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 22:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/#comment-153322</guid>
		<description>Rick brings up a good point with regards to our forces currently in Iraq and the possibility those forces might be needed in Iran at some point. We may be between somewhat of a rock and a hard place at this time. 

As long as we are in Iraq fullscale, it will be difficult (but not impossible) for us to engage Iran militarily the way we might want to. Consider, if we were to attack or invade Iran while we are still in Iraq at the levels we are now. Even with a small scale attack, the ramifications to our efforts and progress in rebuilding Iraq could be seriously damaged. The Iraqi's are if anything, moving closer to  Iran. What would happen to our progress in Iraq now, if we started an Iran war while we were still in Iraq? At minimum we could very well be fighting a two-front war with insurgents inside the wire with us in our rear. And that's a high probability possibility we would rather not face if we dont have to.

Whether you think it may or may not be a good idea to leave Iraq soon, there are definite advantages to doing so with regards to any potential upcoming attack on Iran.

Forgetting for a moment about the Iraqi stability ramifications of us leaving Iraq, consider how helpful that would be to our Iranian engagement if we were clear of Iraq. A Murtha-type plan where our forces redeploy to Kuwait (or somewhere else close by) would be very beneficial to a future Iranian expedition. We could resupply and get fully prepared for an invasion of Iran. Whether we did invade or not, just having all our forces stockpiled in Kuwait tanned, rested, and ready might sway the Iranians that they need to be a little more cooperative with us. It would help diplomatically because they would see we mean business. As it stands now, Iran knows we are in no position to open up another front with them. 

The Iranians are developing nuclear weapons right now. We cant kick that can down the road for another few years, we need to stop that development right now. Who wants another cold war, this time with unstable and beligerent Muslims?

The Iraqi's may have to stand on their own two feet sooner than expected, but like every newborn, we all gotta do it eventually. It may be time for them to start now. We need our forces clear of the Iraqi situation now so we can begin to prepare in earnest for the upcoming Iranian engagements. Let's give Iraq some  "tough love" now by leaving so we can start preparing for the Iranian conflict that must come. We need to be clear of this Iraqi entanglement in order to get prepared to stop what really matters - a middle eastern country with nukes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick brings up a good point with regards to our forces currently in Iraq and the possibility those forces might be needed in Iran at some point. We may be between somewhat of a rock and a hard place at this time. </p>
<p>As long as we are in Iraq fullscale, it will be difficult (but not impossible) for us to engage Iran militarily the way we might want to. Consider, if we were to attack or invade Iran while we are still in Iraq at the levels we are now. Even with a small scale attack, the ramifications to our efforts and progress in rebuilding Iraq could be seriously damaged. The Iraqi&#8217;s are if anything, moving closer to  Iran. What would happen to our progress in Iraq now, if we started an Iran war while we were still in Iraq? At minimum we could very well be fighting a two-front war with insurgents inside the wire with us in our rear. And that&#8217;s a high probability possibility we would rather not face if we dont have to.</p>
<p>Whether you think it may or may not be a good idea to leave Iraq soon, there are definite advantages to doing so with regards to any potential upcoming attack on Iran.</p>
<p>Forgetting for a moment about the Iraqi stability ramifications of us leaving Iraq, consider how helpful that would be to our Iranian engagement if we were clear of Iraq. A Murtha-type plan where our forces redeploy to Kuwait (or somewhere else close by) would be very beneficial to a future Iranian expedition. We could resupply and get fully prepared for an invasion of Iran. Whether we did invade or not, just having all our forces stockpiled in Kuwait tanned, rested, and ready might sway the Iranians that they need to be a little more cooperative with us. It would help diplomatically because they would see we mean business. As it stands now, Iran knows we are in no position to open up another front with them. </p>
<p>The Iranians are developing nuclear weapons right now. We cant kick that can down the road for another few years, we need to stop that development right now. Who wants another cold war, this time with unstable and beligerent Muslims?</p>
<p>The Iraqi&#8217;s may have to stand on their own two feet sooner than expected, but like every newborn, we all gotta do it eventually. It may be time for them to start now. We need our forces clear of the Iraqi situation now so we can begin to prepare in earnest for the upcoming Iranian engagements. Let&#8217;s give Iraq some  &#8220;tough love&#8221; now by leaving so we can start preparing for the Iranian conflict that must come. We need to be clear of this Iraqi entanglement in order to get prepared to stop what really matters - a middle eastern country with nukes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moran</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/comment-page-1/#comment-153321</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 21:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/#comment-153321</guid>
		<description>Doc:

Thanks for the correction. You're right of course. The web page is reminiscent of the Independent.

As for them uttering nonsense, this kind of story gets vetted pretty carefully by senior editors. My guess would be that at the very least, whoever is leaking this story actually believes what they're saying and is not spreading disinformation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc:</p>
<p>Thanks for the correction. You&#8217;re right of course. The web page is reminiscent of the Independent.</p>
<p>As for them uttering nonsense, this kind of story gets vetted pretty carefully by senior editors. My guess would be that at the very least, whoever is leaking this story actually believes what they&#8217;re saying and is not spreading disinformation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocMartyn</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/comment-page-1/#comment-153318</link>
		<dc:creator>DocMartyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 20:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/#comment-153318</guid>
		<description>The Telegraph is not left-wing at all, it the the leading right-wing broardsheet, more right-wing than the Times Order like this Independant, Observer(Sun)/Guardian, Times and then Telegraph.

They also have extensive ties with people in the "Establishment", so the guess that this is a trail ballon is probably correct. Watch the ballon sink without a trace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Telegraph is not left-wing at all, it the the leading right-wing broardsheet, more right-wing than the Times Order like this Independant, Observer(Sun)/Guardian, Times and then Telegraph.</p>
<p>They also have extensive ties with people in the &#8220;Establishment&#8221;, so the guess that this is a trail ballon is probably correct. Watch the ballon sink without a trace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/comment-page-1/#comment-153307</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/#comment-153307</guid>
		<description>Obviously, either the campaign to impeach Bush and Cheney must be ahead of schedule, or the Telegraph is uttering nonsense.  

You make the call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, either the campaign to impeach Bush and Cheney must be ahead of schedule, or the Telegraph is uttering nonsense.  </p>
<p>You make the call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moran</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/comment-page-1/#comment-153185</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 16:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/#comment-153185</guid>
		<description>Brownie:

Your comments are usually so non-germane that it's impossible to carry on any kind of "discussion" with you even if one were inclined to do so.

Simple, regurgitated vomit from the left. Why bother?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brownie:</p>
<p>Your comments are usually so non-germane that it&#8217;s impossible to carry on any kind of &#8220;discussion&#8221; with you even if one were inclined to do so.</p>
<p>Simple, regurgitated vomit from the left. Why bother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Brown</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/comment-page-1/#comment-153183</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/#comment-153183</guid>
		<description>Steve M: Reminds me of a joke that has been going around these last few months:

Q) What do Gerald Ford and George W. Bush have in common?

A) They are both Republicans, both came to office under "special circumstances," they're both dumber than a a pair of socks, and they oversaw America's only two military defeats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve M: Reminds me of a joke that has been going around these last few months:</p>
<p>Q) What do Gerald Ford and George W. Bush have in common?</p>
<p>A) They are both Republicans, both came to office under &#8220;special circumstances,&#8221; they&#8217;re both dumber than a a pair of socks, and they oversaw America&#8217;s only two military defeats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M.</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/comment-page-1/#comment-153182</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/#comment-153182</guid>
		<description>That should read "John Murtha's plan, in other words, only slower?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should read &#8220;John Murtha&#8217;s plan, in other words, only slower?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M.</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/comment-page-1/#comment-153181</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/#comment-153181</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; As much as liberals would like to re-live their greatest triumph of watching America humiliated a la the last helicopter lifting off the roof of our embassy in Saigon, it ainâ€™t going to happen. There is going to be a residual American presence of perhaps 25,000 men â€“ a tripwire force â€“ to prevent Iran and Syria from getting any grandiose ideas about taking advantage of Iraqâ€™s weakness vis a vis any outside threat.&lt;/i&gt;

Johgn Murtha's plan, in other words, only lsower?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> As much as liberals would like to re-live their greatest triumph of watching America humiliated a la the last helicopter lifting off the roof of our embassy in Saigon, it ainâ€™t going to happen. There is going to be a residual American presence of perhaps 25,000 men â€“ a tripwire force â€“ to prevent Iran and Syria from getting any grandiose ideas about taking advantage of Iraqâ€™s weakness vis a vis any outside threat.</i></p>
<p>Johgn Murtha&#8217;s plan, in other words, only lsower?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Brown</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/comment-page-1/#comment-153179</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/05/trial-balloon-for-iraq-pullout/#comment-153179</guid>
		<description>We will be hearing about possible troop removals from Iraq right up until the dismal Bush administration breathes its last fetid breath and slinks from office. But these redeployments will never seem to happen. Each prediction of troops being removed from Iraq will inevitably be followed by accounts of "upticks in violence" that will require a delay in troop departures.

The whole "troop removal" deal is obviously a shuck. It helps to create the impression that our involvement there could be coming to an end, thereby allaying some of the anxiety many feel over the unnecessary death and expenditure of this insane venture.

Of course, and as anyone with a real understanding of our situation there knows, removal of our troops is a military and geopolitical impossibility. To do so would be to leave a vacuum that would be rapidly filled by Iran. Should our troops be taken from Iraq among the firtst things the pro-Tehran govt in Baghdad will do is ask for assistance from Iran in dealing with its insurgency. Something their shi'ite brethren in Tehran will be more than glad to provide.

And who knows, perhaps they'll bring their nukes with them. That way Iraq will finally actually have those WMD you've heard so much about. A little after the fact, however.

In short Rick, its propaganda. You really need not worry about our troops being removed from iraq. We're going to be stuck there for decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will be hearing about possible troop removals from Iraq right up until the dismal Bush administration breathes its last fetid breath and slinks from office. But these redeployments will never seem to happen. Each prediction of troops being removed from Iraq will inevitably be followed by accounts of &#8220;upticks in violence&#8221; that will require a delay in troop departures.</p>
<p>The whole &#8220;troop removal&#8221; deal is obviously a shuck. It helps to create the impression that our involvement there could be coming to an end, thereby allaying some of the anxiety many feel over the unnecessary death and expenditure of this insane venture.</p>
<p>Of course, and as anyone with a real understanding of our situation there knows, removal of our troops is a military and geopolitical impossibility. To do so would be to leave a vacuum that would be rapidly filled by Iran. Should our troops be taken from Iraq among the firtst things the pro-Tehran govt in Baghdad will do is ask for assistance from Iran in dealing with its insurgency. Something their shi&#8217;ite brethren in Tehran will be more than glad to provide.</p>
<p>And who knows, perhaps they&#8217;ll bring their nukes with them. That way Iraq will finally actually have those WMD you&#8217;ve heard so much about. A little after the fact, however.</p>
<p>In short Rick, its propaganda. You really need not worry about our troops being removed from iraq. We&#8217;re going to be stuck there for decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
