Comments on: A WAR OF SHADOWS AND MYTHS http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/20/a-war-of-shadows-and-myths/ Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto. Sat, 02 May 2026 17:34:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Gary Buell http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/20/a-war-of-shadows-and-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-161743 Gary Buell Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:30:14 +0000 http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/20/a-war-of-shadows-and-myths/#comment-161743 As for the document Roy Robison made so much of: http://coverthistory.blogspot.com/2006/03/iraqi-documents-rightwing-blogosphere.html As for the document Roy Robison made so much of:

http://coverthistory.blogspot.com/2006/03/iraqi-documents-rightwing-blogosphere.html

]]> By: brian http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/20/a-war-of-shadows-and-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-161625 brian Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:36:04 +0000 http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/20/a-war-of-shadows-and-myths/#comment-161625 "We better change the constitution now, because if it ever comes to that type of talk we should get ready for President Scharzenneger." And what part should we cut out first? “We better change the constitution now, because if it ever comes to that type of talk we should get ready for President Scharzenneger.”

And what part should we cut out first?

]]> By: Gary Buell http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/20/a-war-of-shadows-and-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-161615 Gary Buell Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:01:19 +0000 http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/20/a-war-of-shadows-and-myths/#comment-161615 For another view one of the documents quoted see: http://www.juancole.com/2006/03/right-blogosphere-scammed-by-bogus.html Widely quoted on the rightwing blogosphere this document turns out to be an old document of American origin originally posted on the internet in 1996. Professor Cole translates the Arabic cover. For another view one of the documents quoted see:

http://www.juancole.com/2006/03/right-blogosphere-scammed-by-bogus.html

Widely quoted on the rightwing blogosphere this document turns out to be an old document of American origin originally posted on the internet in 1996. Professor Cole translates the Arabic cover.

]]> By: Michael L. Cook http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/20/a-war-of-shadows-and-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-161170 Michael L. Cook Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:29:05 +0000 http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/20/a-war-of-shadows-and-myths/#comment-161170 Schwarzenneger. Ahhnolddd. Schwarzenneger. Ahhnolddd.

]]> By: Michael L. Cook http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/20/a-war-of-shadows-and-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-161168 Michael L. Cook Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:26:20 +0000 http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/03/20/a-war-of-shadows-and-myths/#comment-161168 I anticipate that the probability that a WMD will be used on the USA in a 9/11 style sequel is about 100% What will today's anti-Bush zealots say then? Will they say that Bush is to blame because he stirred up a hornet's nest by invading the wrong nests? Will they say that they would have pre-emptively attacked Iran, or Syria, or Saudi Arabia, or whoever else looks most guilty? If a terrorist atom bomb blows up the Capitol dome and no nation-state can be directly shown to be responsible (even though one of them must have been in some type of deep collusion with the terrorists) does that mean we revert to the "Well, we must just try harder to build coalitions of peace loving nations and patiently regain our shattered moral authority?" We better change the constitution now, because if it ever comes to that type of talk we should get ready for President Scharzenneger. I anticipate that the probability that a WMD will be used on the USA in a 9/11 style sequel is about 100% What will today’s anti-Bush zealots say then?

Will they say that Bush is to blame because he stirred up a hornet’s nest by invading the wrong nests? Will they say that they would have pre-emptively attacked Iran, or Syria, or Saudi Arabia, or whoever else looks most guilty?

If a terrorist atom bomb blows up the Capitol dome and no nation-state can be directly shown to be responsible (even though one of them must have been in some type of deep collusion with the terrorists) does that mean we revert to the “Well, we must just try harder to build coalitions of peace loving nations and patiently regain our shattered moral authority?”

We better change the constitution now, because if it ever comes to that type of talk we should get ready for President Scharzenneger.

]]>