<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE IRANIANS RESPOND: &#8220;YOU&#8217;RE BLUFFING&#8230;WE THINK&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 20:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/comment-page-1/#comment-171749</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/#comment-171749</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Council Has Spoken!&lt;/strong&gt;

First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; the winning entries in the Watcher's Council vote for this week are No Relation to Reality, Indeed by ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Council Has Spoken!</strong></p>
<p>First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; the winning entries in the Watcher&#8217;s Council vote for this week are No Relation to Reality, Indeed by &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/comment-page-1/#comment-171035</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/#comment-171035</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council&lt;/strong&gt;

As you may know the members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council each nominate one of his or her own posts and one non-Council post for consideration by the whole Council. The complete list of this week&#8217;s Council nominations is here.   Here&#8217;s wha...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council</strong></p>
<p>As you may know the members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council each nominate one of his or her own posts and one non-Council post for consideration by the whole Council. The complete list of this week&#8217;s Council nominations is here.   Here&#8217;s wha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/comment-page-1/#comment-171036</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/#comment-171036</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council&lt;/strong&gt;

As you may know the members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council each nominate one of his or her own posts and one non-Council post for consideration by the whole Council. The complete list of this week&#8217;s Council nominations is here.   Here&#8217;s wha...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council</strong></p>
<p>As you may know the members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council each nominate one of his or her own posts and one non-Council post for consideration by the whole Council. The complete list of this week&#8217;s Council nominations is here.   Here&#8217;s wha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/comment-page-1/#comment-171037</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/#comment-171037</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council&lt;/strong&gt;

As you may know the members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council each nominate one of his or her own posts and one non-Council post for consideration by the whole Council. The complete list of this week&#8217;s Council nominations is here.   Here&#8217;s wha...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council</strong></p>
<p>As you may know the members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council each nominate one of his or her own posts and one non-Council post for consideration by the whole Council. The complete list of this week&#8217;s Council nominations is here.   Here&#8217;s wha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/comment-page-1/#comment-170878</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 07:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/#comment-170878</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Submitted for Your Approval&lt;/strong&gt;

First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher's Council for this week's vote. Council li...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Submitted for Your Approval</strong></p>
<p>First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council for this week&#8217;s vote. Council li&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/comment-page-1/#comment-170182</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/#comment-170182</guid>
		<description>I don't see what the big deal is.  Of course we have plans to attack Iran.  The military's job is to be ready for action if the President says so.  In order to do so, we pre-plan many aspects in anticipation of possible combat.  I can tell you we've had many different war-plans for Iran since 1979.  This is not new, or surprising, or shocking.  It's one of the military's jobs.

On the other side, does anyone think the Iranians don't have plans for attacking US carriers in the Arabian Gulf, or shutting the straits of Hormuz, or militarily reclaiming disputed Islands in the Gulf, or any number of other scenarios.  Every country in the world does this.  The only difference here is that some of the details of the planning were leaked.  And even that doesn't mean much, because final plans are always changed from preliminary planning to account for the current strategic, tactical and political situation.

To me, as one in the service who has done some of this kind of planning in the past, this is really much ado about nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see what the big deal is.  Of course we have plans to attack Iran.  The military&#8217;s job is to be ready for action if the President says so.  In order to do so, we pre-plan many aspects in anticipation of possible combat.  I can tell you we&#8217;ve had many different war-plans for Iran since 1979.  This is not new, or surprising, or shocking.  It&#8217;s one of the military&#8217;s jobs.</p>
<p>On the other side, does anyone think the Iranians don&#8217;t have plans for attacking US carriers in the Arabian Gulf, or shutting the straits of Hormuz, or militarily reclaiming disputed Islands in the Gulf, or any number of other scenarios.  Every country in the world does this.  The only difference here is that some of the details of the planning were leaked.  And even that doesn&#8217;t mean much, because final plans are always changed from preliminary planning to account for the current strategic, tactical and political situation.</p>
<p>To me, as one in the service who has done some of this kind of planning in the past, this is really much ado about nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Victorino de la Vega</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/comment-page-1/#comment-170003</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Victorino de la Vega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/#comment-170003</guid>
		<description>Itâ€™s dÃ©jÃ  vu all over again: following the â€œsuccessâ€ of their Iraqi ventures, the Neocon Neros of Washington are now toying with the idea of expanding their flourishing business eastward into the highly promising Persian market. 

Frankly, I wonder what theyâ€™ve been smoking latelyâ€¦And I canâ€™t conceptualize the fact that George Bushâ€™s followers still believe the Pentagon-produced infomercials showing complacent cum generously breasted Baghdad girls throwing &lt;a href="http://www.benadorassociates.com/article/664" rel="nofollow"&gt;rosewater, lukums and champagne at our troops&lt;/a&gt; on Apr 9, 2003! â€¦ How on earth canâ€™t they see Teheranâ€™s mullahs were the only winners here? 

As for the Neoconâ€™s belated anti-Persian posturing, it should be taken for what it is: just another hollow gesticulation from a lame-duck administration trying desperately to re-equilibrate the Arab/Iranian geopolitical balance that it had deliberately destroyed in the first place!   

And those ungrateful Ayyranians should be mighty satisfied and thankful for el Chimpresidente nukular supreme de la White Casa knocked their &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Aflaq" rel="nofollow"&gt;secular archenemy &lt;/a&gt;for them and handed them (via their SCIRI cum Daâ€™awa party Islamist stooges) two thirds of Iraq on a silver plate!

Plus the Persians got all that for free: future generations of infidel American taxpayers will generously pick the estimated 2 trillion dollars tab- George Wâ€™s contribution to the Koranic jurisprudential concept of â€œ&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jizya" rel="nofollow"&gt;Jiziyah&lt;/a&gt;â€â€¦ 
   
As a seasoned Sassanid sophist might have said: With foes like these, who needs friends?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Itâ€™s dÃ©jÃ  vu all over again: following the â€œsuccessâ€ of their Iraqi ventures, the Neocon Neros of Washington are now toying with the idea of expanding their flourishing business eastward into the highly promising Persian market. </p>
<p>Frankly, I wonder what theyâ€™ve been smoking latelyâ€¦And I canâ€™t conceptualize the fact that George Bushâ€™s followers still believe the Pentagon-produced infomercials showing complacent cum generously breasted Baghdad girls throwing <a href="http://www.benadorassociates.com/article/664" rel="nofollow">rosewater, lukums and champagne at our troops</a> on Apr 9, 2003! â€¦ How on earth canâ€™t they see Teheranâ€™s mullahs were the only winners here? </p>
<p>As for the Neoconâ€™s belated anti-Persian posturing, it should be taken for what it is: just another hollow gesticulation from a lame-duck administration trying desperately to re-equilibrate the Arab/Iranian geopolitical balance that it had deliberately destroyed in the first place!   </p>
<p>And those ungrateful Ayyranians should be mighty satisfied and thankful for el Chimpresidente nukular supreme de la White Casa knocked their <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Aflaq" rel="nofollow">secular archenemy </a>for them and handed them (via their SCIRI cum Daâ€™awa party Islamist stooges) two thirds of Iraq on a silver plate!</p>
<p>Plus the Persians got all that for free: future generations of infidel American taxpayers will generously pick the estimated 2 trillion dollars tab- George Wâ€™s contribution to the Koranic jurisprudential concept of â€œ<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jizya" rel="nofollow">Jiziyah</a>â€â€¦ </p>
<p>As a seasoned Sassanid sophist might have said: With foes like these, who needs friends?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Satire Fake News -                The Nose On Your Face</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/comment-page-1/#comment-170002</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Satire Fake News -                The Nose On Your Face</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/#comment-170002</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kerry Blasts Bush's "Cowboy Diplomacy" Urges "Brokeback Option" With Iran&lt;/strong&gt;

While making an appearance on Meet The Press this past weekend, Senator John Kerry took the opportunity to blast President Bush for his refusal to take the nuclear option off of the table with regards to dealing with Iran's increasingly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kerry Blasts Bush&#8217;s &#8220;Cowboy Diplomacy&#8221; Urges &#8220;Brokeback Option&#8221; With Iran</strong></p>
<p>While making an appearance on Meet The Press this past weekend, Senator John Kerry took the opportunity to blast President Bush for his refusal to take the nuclear option off of the table with regards to dealing with Iran&#8217;s increasingly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LomaAlta</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/comment-page-1/#comment-169964</link>
		<dc:creator>LomaAlta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 05:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/#comment-169964</guid>
		<description>Nice article Rick. In negotiations of this type, everything has to be on the table from the US side.  Otherwise you have a Carter/Clinton approach.  That did us a lot of good in North Korea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article Rick. In negotiations of this type, everything has to be on the table from the US side.  Otherwise you have a Carter/Clinton approach.  That did us a lot of good in North Korea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEagle</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/comment-page-1/#comment-169951</link>
		<dc:creator>DEagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 03:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/09/the-iranians-respond-youre-bluffingwe-think/#comment-169951</guid>
		<description>It seems that bluff, counterbluff is coming to an end.  The only problem is that Iran does not see the end game.  I have no doubt that the US will prevent Iran from obtaining the bomb and much to their surprise, they will lose all.  

This group of iatolahs will find out the hard way the Bush will not back down...but what the heck, so did Iraq.  I foresee a preemptive attack with possible help from Israel.

This may not be an ideal situation, but no other is acceptable - ie. Iran with the bomb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that bluff, counterbluff is coming to an end.  The only problem is that Iran does not see the end game.  I have no doubt that the US will prevent Iran from obtaining the bomb and much to their surprise, they will lose all.  </p>
<p>This group of iatolahs will find out the hard way the Bush will not back down&#8230;but what the heck, so did Iraq.  I foresee a preemptive attack with possible help from Israel.</p>
<p>This may not be an ideal situation, but no other is acceptable - ie. Iran with the bomb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
