<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ANTI-AMERICAN? OR ANTI-BUSH?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 20:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GOPsince76</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-710513</link>
		<dc:creator>GOPsince76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 03:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/#comment-710513</guid>
		<description>If the evangelicals stay at home in '08 (which will happen if a pro-abortion Guliani or similar is nominated), Hillary Clinton will be the next president of the United States.
The GOP cannot win an election without the Biblical Christians (like myself). CNN and other media mouthpeices are "preaching" a phony hippie peace-at-any-price Jesus that is an invention of the secular fundamentalist left to appeal to the marginal Christians. If the left is able to convince some Christians that "Jesus is all about love", then they could siphon enough votes to carry Ohio and/Missouri and voila, we will have President Clinton II. God help us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the evangelicals stay at home in &#8216;08 (which will happen if a pro-abortion Guliani or similar is nominated), Hillary Clinton will be the next president of the United States.<br />
The GOP cannot win an election without the Biblical Christians (like myself). CNN and other media mouthpeices are &#8220;preaching&#8221; a phony hippie peace-at-any-price Jesus that is an invention of the secular fundamentalist left to appeal to the marginal Christians. If the left is able to convince some Christians that &#8220;Jesus is all about love&#8221;, then they could siphon enough votes to carry Ohio and/Missouri and voila, we will have President Clinton II. God help us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-195405</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 03:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/#comment-195405</guid>
		<description>[...] Anti-American? Or Anti-Bush?Right Wing Nut House [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anti-American? Or Anti-Bush?Right Wing Nut House [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-174883</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 06:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/#comment-174883</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Council Has Spoken!&lt;/strong&gt;

First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; the winning entries in the Watcher's Council vote for this week are Arrogant District Refuses To Prote...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Council Has Spoken!</strong></p>
<p>First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; the winning entries in the Watcher&#8217;s Council vote for this week are Arrogant District Refuses To Prote&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-174003</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/#comment-174003</guid>
		<description>[...] Right Wing Nut House, &#8220;Anti-American?Â  Or Anti-Bush?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Right Wing Nut House, &#8220;Anti-American?Â  Or Anti-Bush?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-173910</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/#comment-173910</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Submitted for Your Approval&lt;/strong&gt;

First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher's Council for this week's vote. Council li...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Submitted for Your Approval</strong></p>
<p>First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council for this week&#8217;s vote. Council li&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diamond</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-173185</link>
		<dc:creator>diamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/#comment-173185</guid>
		<description>"Why is wanting more then two candidates on a ballot so much to ask?"

Well Andrew, I suggest that you keep collecting rocks to throw, that really improves a party.

I can see it now - NEWS FLASH!
             2011 Andrew the "Give Me More Not Less" party leader" whines,"why are there only five candidates on the ballot?"

p.s.    GMMNL party mission:  We need hundreds on the ballot to insure that all voices are represented!  We need a true blend of opinion


Andrew, that would constitute eating Hillary, hairballs and poo!  More doesn't always mean better.  But I waste my time, no more. bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why is wanting more then two candidates on a ballot so much to ask?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well Andrew, I suggest that you keep collecting rocks to throw, that really improves a party.</p>
<p>I can see it now - NEWS FLASH!<br />
             2011 Andrew the &#8220;Give Me More Not Less&#8221; party leader&#8221; whines,&#8221;why are there only five candidates on the ballot?&#8221;</p>
<p>p.s.    GMMNL party mission:  We need hundreds on the ballot to insure that all voices are represented!  We need a true blend of opinion</p>
<p>Andrew, that would constitute eating Hillary, hairballs and poo!  More doesn&#8217;t always mean better.  But I waste my time, no more. bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-173122</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/#comment-173122</guid>
		<description>You miss the point entirely again Diamond.  To me choosing between the two parties is like choosing between a yummy chocolate cake with baby poo for frosting, or and ice cream sundae topped with my cat's hairballs.  Your suggestion that I just eat the poo or hairballs while I try to change the menu doesn't appeal to me and a majority of Americans.

Why is wanting more that two candidates on a ballot so much to ask?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You miss the point entirely again Diamond.  To me choosing between the two parties is like choosing between a yummy chocolate cake with baby poo for frosting, or and ice cream sundae topped with my cat&#8217;s hairballs.  Your suggestion that I just eat the poo or hairballs while I try to change the menu doesn&#8217;t appeal to me and a majority of Americans.</p>
<p>Why is wanting more that two candidates on a ballot so much to ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diamond</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-173115</link>
		<dc:creator>diamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/#comment-173115</guid>
		<description>actually it tells me that the people in this country are whimpy little small minded pukes who, gee I don't know what I want, and for God's sake, don't make me choose.
I like people who make the hard choices and sick with it and try to form the party in a direction that best suits them.  I can over look crap that one always runs into.  You however will throw out the best because it's not perfect.  Does either party really not let you find a home in?
Or is the horror of joining, and maybe joining and having do the work necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually it tells me that the people in this country are whimpy little small minded pukes who, gee I don&#8217;t know what I want, and for God&#8217;s sake, don&#8217;t make me choose.<br />
I like people who make the hard choices and sick with it and try to form the party in a direction that best suits them.  I can over look crap that one always runs into.  You however will throw out the best because it&#8217;s not perfect.  Does either party really not let you find a home in?<br />
Or is the horror of joining, and maybe joining and having do the work necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-173112</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/#comment-173112</guid>
		<description>Well, Diamond, it's not just me.  Since the mid 80's, voters who identify themselves as Republican have never been more than 34% of the electorate. Democrats peaked at 35%.  Independent and non-affiliated voter have constituted the largest block of voters in every single year since 1987. Their numbers peaked at 40% averaged 38% and never fell below 34%.  Republicans averaged 29% and Democrats 33% during the same period.  Does that tell you anything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Diamond, it&#8217;s not just me.  Since the mid 80&#8217;s, voters who identify themselves as Republican have never been more than 34% of the electorate. Democrats peaked at 35%.  Independent and non-affiliated voter have constituted the largest block of voters in every single year since 1987. Their numbers peaked at 40% averaged 38% and never fell below 34%.  Republicans averaged 29% and Democrats 33% during the same period.  Does that tell you anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diamond</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-173095</link>
		<dc:creator>diamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/16/anti-american-or-anti-bush/#comment-173095</guid>
		<description>Andrew:  Can't find a team that you would play for?  Well then just pick up your ball and go home.  Yeal, that's the ticket,  you show'em.  Why you are too damn good and smart to join either party, why you are a party unto yourself.  Strike up the band!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew:  Can&#8217;t find a team that you would play for?  Well then just pick up your ball and go home.  Yeal, that&#8217;s the ticket,  you show&#8217;em.  Why you are too damn good and smart to join either party, why you are a party unto yourself.  Strike up the band!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
