Comments on: ARE YOU “OVER” 9/11 YET?

By: Mescalero

Mescalero — Sat, 22 Apr 2006 03:43:43 +0000

Some interesting, but not particularly relevant comments. The only thing that will alleviate the overwhelming concern of the American people after 9/11 is the fact that we see bin-Ladin and Al-Zawahiri and their CAIR cohorts hanged in public. People–that’s the bottom line.

By: MoveOnAndShutUp.org

MoveOnAndShutUp.org — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:12:23 +0000

KosKids ‘over’ 9/11.

If you haven’t checked your blogging world today, you probably didn’t read this, a Kos diary indicating that the author (and a great deal of his kompadres) are ‘over’ 9/11.

Somebody has to be the first one to say it.
I’m over it.
Yes I was some…

By: diamond

diamond — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:34:28 +0000

Great post, Rick. You seem to bring out the dumb-bells. At another post a few days earlier I asked a question and #13 aka nikko came up with an answer:

seditious traitors

This just about covers the folks that want to
“get over it for now” What fools and how sad that this country is infested with them.

By: Rick Moran

Rick Moran — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:53:36 +0000

Patticakes:

You first comment was deleted for being non germane to the discussion,

By: Sweetie

Sweetie — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:01:37 +0000

Paddy O’Shea for President! He knows what he’s doing.

All the Dems need are better slogans, you know.

By: Mitzi

Mitzi — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:37:58 +0000

Gee Paddy,…get up on the wrong side of the bed today? All the invective and hate oozing from you won’t make your ideas and opinions seem reasonable to anyone. But that really wasn’t the point anyway was it? You just needed to vent a bit.

By: Paddy O'Shea

Paddy O'Shea — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:48:05 +0000

What makes the conceit posted here by by the always irate Rick Moran so laughable is that he still seems to believe that the inept bunglers in the White House are somehow essential to the war on terror.

Wouldn’t we be better off getting some people in there who actually know what they’re doing, rather than continuing to endure the clownish and destructive antics of Bush and Rumsfeld?

By: tyk

tyk — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:23:12 +0000

P.Aaron…Jesus Christ…read your stuff before you post it.

By: Pammy

Pammy — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:59:28 +0000

Rick, I fear you you may be correct about 2008. It is basic human nature to take the path of least resistance and avoid unpleasantness if given a choice. So, as more time passes and 9/11 recedes further into people’s minds, the nation could become increasingly susceptible to the siren call of the left.

By: P. Aaron

P. Aaron — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:16:34 +0000

At Pearl Harbor in 1941 and the aforementioned American convoys to the British shores were ‘military’ targets sighted by anothger military. The battleground was obvious, and opposing sides acknowledged their differences and fought over them.

The hijacking punks of 9/11 were trained in secret and then turned loose upon a civilian society, hidden by civilian dress. They perpetrated their violence upon folks who may have otherwise conversed and considered the terrorists’ arguments…to a degree.

Yet in the end, free nations exposed by their ability to penetrate and kill here the utter damnation of their own societies in that we not only go had to go “there” and kick their butts, but then expend further blood and treasure to set up their society so THEY DON’T HAVE TO! Not only do they kill us, but we then go and straighten out their own country(s) in return.

They merely have to manage a maintenence schedule.

I’m done now.