<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FISKING JAMES BOWMAN&#8217;S REVIEW OF U-93</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/04/fisking-james-bowmans-review-of-u-93/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/04/fisking-james-bowmans-review-of-u-93/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 09:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Publius</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/04/fisking-james-bowmans-review-of-u-93/comment-page-1/#comment-181201</link>
		<dc:creator>Publius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 13:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/04/fisking-james-bowmans-review-of-u-93/#comment-181201</guid>
		<description>Rick, excellent counter to Bowman's review.  I usually read his work and find myself in line with his thinking, but having seen U-93 I went through his review line by line trying to figure out his point, and whether we'd seen the same movie.  I guess all critics (even the best ones) are entitled to a mistake every so often.  I'm glad that you pointed out his errors, as I'm sure that I and others reading the Spectator wondered if we were wrong in our assessment of this fine film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick, excellent counter to Bowman&#8217;s review.  I usually read his work and find myself in line with his thinking, but having seen U-93 I went through his review line by line trying to figure out his point, and whether we&#8217;d seen the same movie.  I guess all critics (even the best ones) are entitled to a mistake every so often.  I&#8217;m glad that you pointed out his errors, as I&#8217;m sure that I and others reading the Spectator wondered if we were wrong in our assessment of this fine film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
