<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HUGH HEWITT: KOOL AID DRINKER OR SAGE OF SAGES?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CosmoReaxer</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/comment-page-1/#comment-185097</link>
		<dc:creator>CosmoReaxer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 14:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/#comment-185097</guid>
		<description>I'm going with Kool Aid drinker. Hugh's got a great show, but he views politics through rose-colored (which I guess does mean red) glasses. It's not just this post, which is indeed ludicrous -- seriously, competitive in Florida? without a candidate change? seriously! -- but a whole line of pronouncements, especially including his absurd complacency in the face of Harriet Miers' nomination. Hugh can be a very sharp thinker, but his partisanship unfortunately gets in the way of him always being so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going with Kool Aid drinker. Hugh&#8217;s got a great show, but he views politics through rose-colored (which I guess does mean red) glasses. It&#8217;s not just this post, which is indeed ludicrous &#8212; seriously, competitive in Florida? without a candidate change? seriously! &#8212; but a whole line of pronouncements, especially including his absurd complacency in the face of Harriet Miers&#8217; nomination. Hugh can be a very sharp thinker, but his partisanship unfortunately gets in the way of him always being so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joust The Facts</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/comment-page-1/#comment-184232</link>
		<dc:creator>Joust The Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 02:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/#comment-184232</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Midterm Elections: Is The 'Conventional Wisdom' Wise?&lt;/strong&gt;

A couple of articles today got me thinking about the forthcoming midterm elections. You know, the ones where Republicans are going to be turned out from DC in droves and the newly Democratic House and Senate will be investigatin' and</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Midterm Elections: Is The &#8216;Conventional Wisdom&#8217; Wise?</strong></p>
<p>A couple of articles today got me thinking about the forthcoming midterm elections. You know, the ones where Republicans are going to be turned out from DC in droves and the newly Democratic House and Senate will be investigatin&#8217; and</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/comment-page-1/#comment-183981</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 23:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/#comment-183981</guid>
		<description>Far more than Watergate, the factors that gave the Democrats 54 seats in 1974 were double digit inflation, gas prices, and gas lines.  Vietnam was a non-issue.  

Today we have a war, but aside from gas prices inflation is not high and no one is waiting in line to pay for gas.  If the pump price drops below $2.50 by November the GOP is fairly secure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Far more than Watergate, the factors that gave the Democrats 54 seats in 1974 were double digit inflation, gas prices, and gas lines.  Vietnam was a non-issue.  </p>
<p>Today we have a war, but aside from gas prices inflation is not high and no one is waiting in line to pay for gas.  If the pump price drops below $2.50 by November the GOP is fairly secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Voices &#187; &#187; RV Poll #13 - Has your personal approval for the job President Bush is doing waivered?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/comment-page-1/#comment-183911</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Voices &#187; &#187; RV Poll #13 - Has your personal approval for the job President Bush is doing waivered?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 19:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/#comment-183911</guid>
		<description>[...] Right Wing Nuthouse states ..the biggest mistake this President has made to date has been his failure to call on the American people for shared sacrifice in the prosecution of the war.. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Right Wing Nuthouse states ..the biggest mistake this President has made to date has been his failure to call on the American people for shared sacrifice in the prosecution of the war.. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moran</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/comment-page-1/#comment-183777</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 16:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/#comment-183777</guid>
		<description>I was writing about most liberals talking about the "War on Terror" - that by putting it in quote marks, they think they can somehow wish it away.

People can disagree about the efficacy of pre emptive war. But to belittle or even fail to acknowledge that we are at war with Islamism, the left not only deligitimzes the war but shunts 9/11 to the background as if that date didn't happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was writing about most liberals talking about the &#8220;War on Terror&#8221; - that by putting it in quote marks, they think they can somehow wish it away.</p>
<p>People can disagree about the efficacy of pre emptive war. But to belittle or even fail to acknowledge that we are at war with Islamism, the left not only deligitimzes the war but shunts 9/11 to the background as if that date didn&#8217;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hallfasthero</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/comment-page-1/#comment-183733</link>
		<dc:creator>Hallfasthero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 14:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/#comment-183733</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;After all, since most Democrats do not believe we are at war in the first place, (seeing the issue of national security a political weakness) they wish to make it virtually impossible for any future President to use force except as a response to an attack â€“ say a nuke detonated in New York City. What good any kind of response would be at that point, the Democrats refuse to say.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


No offense, Rick, but that is a cheap shot. 

The issue of Bush's pre-emptive war was extremely dangerous and a change of policy for the U.S. which had brought a lot of hazards with it. The fact that nothing was uncovered in Iraq which proved to be of any danger to us destroyed our credibility. More than once I said this was going to be a problem if and when we dealt with a country who truly WAS a hazard (Iran). That president is a lunatic with the financial resources to bankroll a nuclear program. But look where we are now. We start screaming war and we look like the boy who cried wolf. On top of which the insinuation that it was done just to get at Saddams' oil is ringing loud and clear in Europe and the Middle East.

As things stand now, we really DO have to be careful how we use force now. The soldiers are getting tired, and right now there is no end in sight, so what soldiers will we use to conduct this war? We will need to ultimately replace a lot of military equipment that will be used up by the time the Iraq campaign ends&#62; This is an extremely expensive financial situations that will only feed an already obscene deficit. Then there is the issue that, in the world's eye, we are now no longer trusted like we once were. Bush didn't just spend is own political capital with this war, he spent ours. 

I am sorry but right now, we are starting to tread water as a country and a person would have to be blind not to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>After all, since most Democrats do not believe we are at war in the first place, (seeing the issue of national security a political weakness) they wish to make it virtually impossible for any future President to use force except as a response to an attack â€“ say a nuke detonated in New York City. What good any kind of response would be at that point, the Democrats refuse to say.</p></blockquote>
<p>No offense, Rick, but that is a cheap shot. </p>
<p>The issue of Bush&#8217;s pre-emptive war was extremely dangerous and a change of policy for the U.S. which had brought a lot of hazards with it. The fact that nothing was uncovered in Iraq which proved to be of any danger to us destroyed our credibility. More than once I said this was going to be a problem if and when we dealt with a country who truly WAS a hazard (Iran). That president is a lunatic with the financial resources to bankroll a nuclear program. But look where we are now. We start screaming war and we look like the boy who cried wolf. On top of which the insinuation that it was done just to get at Saddams&#8217; oil is ringing loud and clear in Europe and the Middle East.</p>
<p>As things stand now, we really DO have to be careful how we use force now. The soldiers are getting tired, and right now there is no end in sight, so what soldiers will we use to conduct this war? We will need to ultimately replace a lot of military equipment that will be used up by the time the Iraq campaign ends&gt; This is an extremely expensive financial situations that will only feed an already obscene deficit. Then there is the issue that, in the world&#8217;s eye, we are now no longer trusted like we once were. Bush didn&#8217;t just spend is own political capital with this war, he spent ours. </p>
<p>I am sorry but right now, we are starting to tread water as a country and a person would have to be blind not to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitty</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/comment-page-1/#comment-183709</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 12:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/#comment-183709</guid>
		<description>I wouldn't give too much credence to polls:

http://www.anklebitingpundits.com/index.php?name=News&#38;file=article&#38;sid=3546</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t give too much credence to polls:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.anklebitingpundits.com/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=3546" rel="nofollow">http://www.anklebitingpundits.com/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=3546</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris At Home</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/comment-page-1/#comment-183456</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris At Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 05:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/#comment-183456</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How to Lose an Election&lt;/strong&gt;

We have seen the Republicans do their best to lose the 2006 mid-term elections with pork barrel spending, ignoring their base on immigration enforcement, an inability to communicate effectively on the war.  Polls show that a  ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How to Lose an Election</strong></p>
<p>We have seen the Republicans do their best to lose the 2006 mid-term elections with pork barrel spending, ignoring their base on immigration enforcement, an inability to communicate effectively on the war.  Polls show that a  &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/comment-page-1/#comment-183441</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 05:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/#comment-183441</guid>
		<description>Nervous Nellies, the lot o'ya.  Democrats will not take over either house, if you want confirmation of that, replay Pelosi's interview on MTP on your Tivo.  Futhermore, we have a great economy, roaring along, low base inflations, home sales, consumer confidence, jobs.  The BEST strategy for the GOP is to NATONALIZE the election.  Here's the pitch, "So You Want to Hand Over this Economy to THEM??"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nervous Nellies, the lot o&#8217;ya.  Democrats will not take over either house, if you want confirmation of that, replay Pelosi&#8217;s interview on MTP on your Tivo.  Futhermore, we have a great economy, roaring along, low base inflations, home sales, consumer confidence, jobs.  The BEST strategy for the GOP is to NATONALIZE the election.  Here&#8217;s the pitch, &#8220;So You Want to Hand Over this Economy to THEM??&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chilly Windbag Bruce</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/comment-page-1/#comment-183332</link>
		<dc:creator>Chilly Windbag Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 01:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/07/hugh-hewitt-kool-aid-drinker-or-sage-of-sages/#comment-183332</guid>
		<description>Polls can reflect whatever the pollster wants the result to be.  The only poll that ever has any validity is the one called an election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polls can reflect whatever the pollster wants the result to be.  The only poll that ever has any validity is the one called an election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
