<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IRAN USING &#8220;THE SCALI GAMBIT&#8221; IN POTENTIAL NUKE TALKS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/11/iran-using-the-scali-gambit-in-potential-nuke-talks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/11/iran-using-the-scali-gambit-in-potential-nuke-talks/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rdh</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/11/iran-using-the-scali-gambit-in-potential-nuke-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-186415</link>
		<dc:creator>rdh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 12:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/11/iran-using-the-scali-gambit-in-potential-nuke-talks/#comment-186415</guid>
		<description>Before the nuke-issue became the only topic of public opinion, do you recall the Iranian economy was deplorable, restlessness in the public mosques, young folks considering revolt, attention starting to focus on Iran's role in Iraq, open support for terrorists groups, amoung others. 

So what to do? Why not just rev up a nuke threat, and create a crisis.  The score so far seems to be hugely on the side of Iranian objectives:

a. huge increases in oil revenue looks to have salvaged their ecnonomy since their actions have added a fear premium (maybe 10-15 US$ per barrel?)
b. purge the malecontents. Stalin killed millions mostly without notice while the West focused on all kinds of things.
c. other external activities viewed unflavorable by others are mostly given a pass and fade to noise level.
d. add immensely to the "Arab street" image of Iran (ala Nassar) in standing up to the West.
e. enlist the usual divisions in the West that seem only to focus on the most recent event as "crisis" management.

I'd agree this is a gambit, but a minor one.  This one will play out over the next year or so, much like the Ali Rope-a-Dope.  Iran Islamist will be much, much stronger and will claim yet another win in a much greater game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the nuke-issue became the only topic of public opinion, do you recall the Iranian economy was deplorable, restlessness in the public mosques, young folks considering revolt, attention starting to focus on Iran&#8217;s role in Iraq, open support for terrorists groups, amoung others. </p>
<p>So what to do? Why not just rev up a nuke threat, and create a crisis.  The score so far seems to be hugely on the side of Iranian objectives:</p>
<p>a. huge increases in oil revenue looks to have salvaged their ecnonomy since their actions have added a fear premium (maybe 10-15 US$ per barrel?)<br />
b. purge the malecontents. Stalin killed millions mostly without notice while the West focused on all kinds of things.<br />
c. other external activities viewed unflavorable by others are mostly given a pass and fade to noise level.<br />
d. add immensely to the &#8220;Arab street&#8221; image of Iran (ala Nassar) in standing up to the West.<br />
e. enlist the usual divisions in the West that seem only to focus on the most recent event as &#8220;crisis&#8221; management.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d agree this is a gambit, but a minor one.  This one will play out over the next year or so, much like the Ali Rope-a-Dope.  Iran Islamist will be much, much stronger and will claim yet another win in a much greater game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Zero Point</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/11/iran-using-the-scali-gambit-in-potential-nuke-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-186398</link>
		<dc:creator>The Zero Point</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 11:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/11/iran-using-the-scali-gambit-in-potential-nuke-talks/#comment-186398</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Iranian Missile Crisis&lt;/strong&gt;

Time magazine reveals that they too received a love letter from Iran regarding the regime's runaway nuclear program....a second document, written by a top Iranian official and given to TIME just before Ahmadinejad's letter was made public, offers a m...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Iranian Missile Crisis</strong></p>
<p>Time magazine reveals that they too received a love letter from Iran regarding the regime&#8217;s runaway nuclear program&#8230;.a second document, written by a top Iranian official and given to TIME just before Ahmadinejad&#8217;s letter was made public, offers a m&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Schulman</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/11/iran-using-the-scali-gambit-in-potential-nuke-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-186154</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Schulman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 02:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/11/iran-using-the-scali-gambit-in-potential-nuke-talks/#comment-186154</guid>
		<description>I'm extremely surprised that this second letter has received scant attention in the MSM and in the blogosphere.  I can see no reason why their anti-Bush bias would cause the MSM to conclude that Rohani's letter isn't newsworthy.  Can you?

The blogosphere's limited interest is, if anything, even more inexplicable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m extremely surprised that this second letter has received scant attention in the MSM and in the blogosphere.  I can see no reason why their anti-Bush bias would cause the MSM to conclude that Rohani&#8217;s letter isn&#8217;t newsworthy.  Can you?</p>
<p>The blogosphere&#8217;s limited interest is, if anything, even more inexplicable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Blog For All</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/11/iran-using-the-scali-gambit-in-potential-nuke-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-186150</link>
		<dc:creator>A Blog For All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 01:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/11/iran-using-the-scali-gambit-in-potential-nuke-talks/#comment-186150</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ahmadinejad's Latest Declaration...&lt;/strong&gt;

Well, it now appears that Iran wasn't sending President Bush a love note earlier this week. It was a call to submit to Islam or face the consequences. Just as Robert Spencer had said when the contents were first revealed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ahmadinejad&#8217;s Latest Declaration&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Well, it now appears that Iran wasn&#8217;t sending President Bush a love note earlier this week. It was a call to submit to Islam or face the consequences. Just as Robert Spencer had said when the contents were first revealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
