<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CROSSTOWN SHOWDOWN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/20/crosstown-showdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/20/crosstown-showdown/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 07:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: clyde</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/20/crosstown-showdown/comment-page-1/#comment-235284</link>
		<dc:creator>clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/20/crosstown-showdown/#comment-235284</guid>
		<description>I've always wondered why the White Sox stopped wearing white socks and went to black socks. Are they "honoring" the 1919 team? The White Sox are the only major league team to wear socks of a different color than their name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always wondered why the White Sox stopped wearing white socks and went to black socks. Are they &#8220;honoring&#8221; the 1919 team? The White Sox are the only major league team to wear socks of a different color than their name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nutrightwing</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/20/crosstown-showdown/comment-page-1/#comment-193907</link>
		<dc:creator>nutrightwing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 17:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/20/crosstown-showdown/#comment-193907</guid>
		<description>I'm just pleased that a top blogger is so close to my home and a sox  fan to boot. I had no idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just pleased that a top blogger is so close to my home and a sox  fan to boot. I had no idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/20/crosstown-showdown/comment-page-1/#comment-193428</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 00:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/20/crosstown-showdown/#comment-193428</guid>
		<description>Nice post.  Jeff Kent regularly batted third as a Giant.  Not sure where he's hitting now with the Dodgers.  Your point is still correct, a third place hitting 2nd baseman is a rarity.  Kent's a first ballot hall-of-famer.  Hey, it worked for Dusty in SF.  Maybe Walker is headed for the Hall and we just don't know it yet.  But I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post.  Jeff Kent regularly batted third as a Giant.  Not sure where he&#8217;s hitting now with the Dodgers.  Your point is still correct, a third place hitting 2nd baseman is a rarity.  Kent&#8217;s a first ballot hall-of-famer.  Hey, it worked for Dusty in SF.  Maybe Walker is headed for the Hall and we just don&#8217;t know it yet.  But I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kreiz</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/20/crosstown-showdown/comment-page-1/#comment-192955</link>
		<dc:creator>kreiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 10:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/05/20/crosstown-showdown/#comment-192955</guid>
		<description>Great piece, Rick.  The Sox remain virtually unknown, victims of the marketing masterpiece that is the Cubs:  Wrigley Field, ivy, the WGN Superstation and hapless, ill-fated, defeatist ball clubs.  I'm uncertain of your eco-political observations for two reasons.  The Cubs are at some level a capitalistic triumph.  And the Sox haven't been market-responsive until relatively recently (they've been awful for decades).  Still, it's great to see the Sox rising out of the ashes of anonymity.  I hope their assent continues.

Here's the truth.  The Democrats are the Cubs- hapless and defeatist- never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece, Rick.  The Sox remain virtually unknown, victims of the marketing masterpiece that is the Cubs:  Wrigley Field, ivy, the WGN Superstation and hapless, ill-fated, defeatist ball clubs.  I&#8217;m uncertain of your eco-political observations for two reasons.  The Cubs are at some level a capitalistic triumph.  And the Sox haven&#8217;t been market-responsive until relatively recently (they&#8217;ve been awful for decades).  Still, it&#8217;s great to see the Sox rising out of the ashes of anonymity.  I hope their assent continues.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the truth.  The Democrats are the Cubs- hapless and defeatist- never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
