Comments on: ABRAMOFF SINGING, HASTERT DANCING

By: PatD

PatD — Sat, 27 May 2006 20:09:31 +0000

Let the GOP manned circular firing squad begin.

By: ccraig

ccraig — Fri, 26 May 2006 19:48:28 +0000

“â€œHey! Itâ€™s not our fault that weâ€™re reporting Abramoffâ€™s lies. Our source is bad.â€”

Like Bush and the WMDs?

By: Pro Cynic

Pro Cynic — Fri, 26 May 2006 02:03:29 +0000

The GOP is in full meltdown

Right now, the national Republicans are in such complete Chernobyl meltdown that I don’t know where to begin discussing it.

1. The stance taken by W and the Senate on illegal immigration is simply inexcusable. Power Line rips it apart here. It’s a…

By: KMan

KMan — Thu, 25 May 2006 19:29:01 +0000

A law enforcement source who wishes to remain anonymous told me that Brian Ross is under investigation for having sex with sheep.

While Brian denies it and Farmer Bill claims that the story is completely false, my source confirms that Brian is ‘in the mix’ with the sheep sex story and readers are not following the language carefully enough.

So it must be true, right?

By: Bruce

Bruce — Thu, 25 May 2006 19:12:31 +0000

I hear this is the same Brian Ross who “broke” that story about SUV exploding gas tanks, by rigging a small charge to the tanks to make the story look better. Talk about “truth in journalism”!

By: crosspatch

crosspatch — Thu, 25 May 2006 17:12:03 +0000

But the major reason he needs to be fired is that he re-wrote the story. See Hugh Hewitt or my blog. The text of the article that is currently at The Blotter (must be what Ross is using recreationally, I didn’t know they still made that stuff) is different than the original text so while ABC might be claiming to “stand behind the story” they have gone back and re-written history so the story they are “standing behind” isn’t the one they originally broke. It is just plain dishonest. “Hiding behind” their story might be more accurate. You can issue a new story but you don’t go rewiting history and change an article after it si published without so much as a comment or footnote or something.

By: Suldog

Suldog — Thu, 25 May 2006 16:14:24 +0000

Sorry - comment not related to current post.

I just came across your kind words about my blog, made some 180 days ago and still floating about in the ether, and wanted to make sure you knew that they were noted and that I am thankful for them. So, now I have. Ta-ta!

By: roanoke

roanoke — Thu, 25 May 2006 15:49:46 +0000

Linking to Michelle Malkin and Hot Air… She’s nothing more than a propagandist and you ruin your credibility when you do so. If you don’t recognize those elements and her lack of ethics it’s a shame. There is no reason to come to other blogs if you all follow her.

By: Scrapiron

Scrapiron — Thu, 25 May 2006 15:31:35 +0000

ABC along with the other alpha news organizations have lied to the American people for so long that i find it hard to believe that even the simple minded lefties would believe a word they say. The only thing true in any major broadcast/publication is the comics and i’ve noticed a definate creep of left wing politic’s (aka lies) into the comics. Why corporations would pay a dime to advertise in these rags in beyond me. Guess that’s why i cancelled all of my subscriptions except the local town paper and never watch the big four (ABC,CBS,NBC,CNN) mouthpieces for any enemy of freedom.

By: Karl

Karl — Thu, 25 May 2006 15:11:31 +0000

Semantics aside? You may not like what you admit is probably a legal practice, but giving the false implication (as ABC did) that he is the subject or target of an investigation and ignoring the role of the other party is a bit more than mere semantics.