Given that my common law relations have been delayed a few hours (sparing yours truly the frightening prospect of having to interact with human beings less than 4 feet tall and of considerably less advanced years than me), here are a few more tidbits from my web journeys this morning.
“THE WORST BOOK OF 2005”
Leave it to R. Emmett Tyrell to do a real, first class deconstruction of Jimmy Carter. Giving him the J. Gordon Coogler Award for the worst book written in 2005, Tyrell slices, dices, and barbecues the ex-President as only he can:
Jimmy has actually published 20 books now. Probably he should have been made Coogler Laureate 20 times. The problem is, so vain is this insufferable huckster and so desperate has he become for notice that, as his presidency attracts ever more flies in history’s dustbin, he is increasingly likely to show up at our Coogler Awards ceremony—whether invited or not. There he would stand, clutching his Coogler to his bosom and sermonizing until the janitors turned out the lights. Worse, he might bring Rosalynn, an author in her own right.Jimmy was the worst president in American history and, in personal terms, the most repellent. That last statement would have been implausible a year or so after he vacated the White House. Today, however, after a quarter-century of caddish behavior toward his successors, it is perfectly acceptable. His public criticisms of sitting presidents have been insulting and usually dishonest. He has oozed vitriol against America even while he was strutting on foreign soil. Before him no president criticized his government from foreign soil. Jimmy has repeatedly broken that rule.
In fact, no prior president has spoken as rudely and dishonestly of his successors or of his country as has Jimmy. The acerbic Harry Truman came to loathe President Dwight D. Eisenhower. In public, however, Harry minded his tongue.
Jimmy’s presidential achievements were even more modest than those of Bill Clinton and of Gerald Ford, and his blunders on domestic and foreign policy are unsurpassed and possibly unsurpassable. What is more he writes bad books.
Read the entire, hysterical piece.
REMEMBER…
Lori Byrd (blogging from her swanky new digs at Wizbang) is asking for links that highlight what Memorial Day should be all about. I will have a post Monday with some thoughts, but please go to Wizbang and leave a link to a news story or a blog post that you find particularly relevant.
NET NEUTRALITY MAKING PROGRESS
It appears that the bipartisan net neutrality coalition is making an impact.
The broad, nonpartisan movement for Internet freedom notched a major victory today, when a bipartisan majority of the House Judiciary Committee passed the “Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2006″ — a bill that offers meaningful protections for Network Neutrality, “the First Amendment of the Internet.â€20 members of the Committee (6 Republicans and 14 Democrats) voted for the bipartisan Bill, and only 13 against.
This legislation has the support of many conservatives and liberals and is designed to keep large Telecoms from imposing a “two tiered” internet on the rest of us. For information on what this legislation does, go to Save The Internet.Com and read about it.
YES…BUT WHAT DOES FERDY THINK?
Without a doubt, the smartest feline on the internet is Ferdy the Cat. As a guardian of internet behavior, Ferdy celebrates the takedown of hackers and spammers wherever they ply their execrable trade.
This news story is something I would like to see more often. I want to see hackers getting arrested and spending long years in jail. I want to see these jail terms publicly announced over and over again. Every hacker should be seen as a disgusting little felon instead of a romantic warrior against The System.Thank you for listening to this important message. We will resume our usual light-hearted fare as soon as Bruce finishes trying to get the new web development software at work to operate properly within the guidelines of the lab’s security system.
Sounds like Bruce is going to be busy for a while…
Ferdy will probably be doing a cat dance when he hears of this.
HAYDEN CONFIRMED AS CIA CHIEF
What about the big fight all the netnuts were promising over this nomination?
At his confirmation hearing, Hayden sought to assure lawmakers he would be independent from his military superiors but said he would consider how his uniform affects his relationship with CIA personnel. If it were to get in the way, he said, “I’ll make the right decision.”Hayden, who headed the National Security Agency for several years, became a lightning rod for the debate about the Bush administration’s domestic eavesdropping program. Some Democrats and civil-liberties advocates argue the monitoring was illegal.
As head of the NSA from 1999 to 2005, Hayden oversaw the program. His defenders say he was relying on the advice of top government lawyers.
Hayden was confirmed by a vote of 78-15. And this points up the utter vacuousness of the left’s critique of all the NSA “surveillance” programs – the Democrats themselves are not saying that the programs are illegal and with very few exceptions, are not calling for these program’s termination.
Having said that, I have my own questions about how these programs have been run and I believe it would be in the interest of civil liberties if a full briefing on how these programs operate be given to the full House and Senate Intelligence Committees. I also am worried about proper oversight.
But to say the programs are, on their face, illegal is just plain stupid. Just another outgrowth of Bush Derangement Syndrome…
THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES
His Highness has been “tagged” and the questions he is forced to answer are revealing the pussycat beneath the warlike exterior:
4. Would you rather sleep with someone else, or alone?Now, let’s be logical here: If I’m asleep, why would I care? That being said, it’s so much more fun going to bed knowing that there’s somebody you can make utterly miserable with your loud snoring.
13. Who was your first love?
A lovely, sweet little Korean girl that I had the worst crush on in 2nd grade. She must have loved me too. She didn’t slap me, call me a “pervert†or kick me in the groin, not once. Unfortunately, those were only three things on a rather long list of things that she most pointedly didn’t do.
19. What’s the one thing on your mind?
Avoiding ever reaching the point in my life where I have only one thing on my mind.
MEXICO GETS “VETO POWER” OVER BORDER ENFORCEMENT?
I’m not sure if this is something to worry about or if it’s just common courtesy:
(b) CONSULTATION REQUIREMENT.—Consultations between United States and Mexican authorities at the federal, state, and local levels concerning the construction of additional fencing and related border security structures along the United States-Mexico border shall be undertaken prior to commencing any new construction, in order to solicit the views of affected communities, lessen tensions and foster greater understanding and stronger cooperation on this and other important issues of mutual concern.
If this is indeed “consultation” I don’t think we have anything to worry about. However, given this Administration’s curious rollovers when it comes to pleasing Vicente Fox, I would follow any “consultations” like a hawk.
JUST WHEN YOU THOUGHT IT WAS SAFE TO GO BACK TO BLOGGING…
Former FEC Commissioner Bradley Smith is raising additional warnings about blog regulation:
Now a contributor at RedState, Smith pointed readers to a new article that included what he saw as a foreboding quote from Rep. Tom Allen, D-Maine.Allen “co-sponsored legislation in March that would bring political Web sites under campaign finance rules if they spend $5,000 or more on their operations,” the paper wrote. “He said he would watch how blogs factor into the 2006 races under the FEC rules before deciding whether to press the issue.”
Smith’s reaction: “We need to understand that these guys are relentlessly hostile to free, unfettered political speech. Every bit of freedom they see as a potential threat, and they are always ready to regulate as soon as they think the have the votes.”
Given John McCain’s recent comments made about bloggers at The New School commencement where he accused us of being little better than ideological hit beasts, I think we should take Mr. Smith’s warnings to heart. Once McCain’s candidacy gets underway, he knows that he will be skewered on a daily basis by conservatives and may seek to forestall criticism by putting some bloggers out of business.
GLOBAL WARMING DEBATE HEATING UP
I find myself in almost total agreement with the Commissar here:
I’m not sure what to make of the global warming debate. With the release of algore’s “Inconvenient Truths,†the discussion is front-and-center again. On the one side the many scientists and politicians who warn that human activities (CO2 emissions, for example) have added to global warming, that it is worsening, and that we must take steps to alleviate it; these are the “advocates.†On the other side — the skeptics, the rebutters.The complex forecasting models used are beyond my understanding. About the only way for me to make sense of this debate is to look at the competing claims of the different sides, and see which seems more compelling, more objective.
So much of the information we get seems to be agenda driven – by both sides. I read Scientific American a lot because at least they give both sides a fair hearing. But read all of the Commissar’s post for some truly thoughtful analysis.
MISSING IRAQ WMD’S
Frontpage has an interesting colloquy between three “experts” who are convinced that IRAQ’s WMD was spirited off to Syria by Russian Spetznatz troops prior to the invasion:
Just recently, Saddam Hussein’s former southern regional commander, Gen. Al-Tikriti, gave the first videotaped testimony confirming that Iraq had WMDs up to the American invasion in 2003 and that Russia helped removed them prior to the war. His testimony confirms numerous other sources that have pointed to Russia’s secret alliance with Iraq and the co-ordinated moving of WMDs before the American liberation. Today we’ve invited three experts on this subject to discuss the details of Al-Tikriti’s testimony and its larger significance.
Color me unconvinced, although I would love to know what Russia was moving to Syria (and Lebanon) prior to the war. The preponderance of evidence to date suggests that Saddam was fooled into believing he had WMD when he didn’t. Until something a little more substantial emerges to counter that argument, I will remain a reluctant skeptic.
AL QAEDA’S “LONG WAR” SCENARIO
Rusty Shackleford has a superior piece about plans being made by al Qaeda for the long term conflict with the west:
At some point, al Qaeda realizes, it is not enough to simply weaken the will of the enemy. Readers should remember that the goal of terrorists is not to “terrorize”. Terrorism is a method, not a goal. Al Qaeda’s goal is the same goal as the Council on American Islamic Relations or the Muslim American Society—the imposition of Sharia law and the eventual restoration of the global Caliphate. What separates CAIR and MAS from al Qaeda is not the goal, but only the means to achieve it.
Read the whole thing.
Finally, many thanks to John Hawkins at Right Wing News for making The House “Website of the Day” yesterday.
1:27 pm
Nice tidbits.
Mexico gets more than “veto power” over our border fence, etc., it has a direct pipeline to every city and town in America. Please see the Mexico Country Profile at my site.
Thanks.
1:59 pm
General Hayden Confirmed
So, was all that tough confirmation talk much ado about nothing? From Fox News:WASHINGTON — The Senate on Friday confirmed Air Force Gen. Michael Hayden as CIA chief, the first active-duty or retired military officer to be director of the
2:37 pm
The Russian Syria link to Iraq’s WMD needs to be further investigated. The conventional wisdom on this may turn out to be true and there were no stockpiles of WMD. The ISG even said it was unable to complete the investigation into what was transferred into Syria. Some enterprising reporter with the MSM should get on this. Oh yeah, I forgot they are to busy looking for ways to bash the president than they are to worry about little things like national security.
8:50 pm
The full House and Senate Intelligence committees were briefed on the Terrorist Screening Programs.
9:04 pm
You’re right to remain a reluctant sceptic on WMD’s to Syria. The interview you mention is from a guy that defected to us prior to the 1991 Gulf War. He hasn’t been in Iraq for 15 years, so his claims are pretty much baseless. While it may be true that Iraq had plans to transfer WMD’s to Syria in the 1980’s, that doesn’t mean they existed in 2003. And this flies in the face of the evidence we have from the Iraqi Perspective’s Project, which shows that Saddam, until the end, though the Russians and French would prevent an invasion. Once the invasion started, he still believe he wouldn’t be overthrown. It wasn’t until our tanks were in Baghdad that the truth finally dawned on him. Why would he move WMD’s to Syria if he thought we wouldn’t invade? That’s only the beginning. We have captured all the principal actors in the Iraq WMD program including Saddam himself. I find it hard to believe that none of them would out such a plan if it existed.
4:03 pm
Memorial Day: VIDEO- Remembrance
We honor all those Patriots who have sacrificed their lives for our Freedoms, the Freedoms of future young patriots… And the hope of
Democracy, for those less fortunate.”
9:11 am
NFL Sports Picks
Find free and garuanteed nfl sports picks