<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LA TIMES OFFERS MORE PROOF WHY NO ONE BOTHERS TO READ IT ANYMORE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 03:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moran</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-238488</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/#comment-238488</guid>
		<description>I obviously don't read enough economic news!

Then again, numbers always confused me. And math was never my strong suit in school. Besides, I had a nice qualifier when making that statement...

"perhaps the first time..."

To err is human. To admit it if you're a blogger is divine. See my post today about the Truthout.Org mess and the Rove indictment that never happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I obviously don&#8217;t read enough economic news!</p>
<p>Then again, numbers always confused me. And math was never my strong suit in school. Besides, I had a nice qualifier when making that statement&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;perhaps the first time&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>To err is human. To admit it if you&#8217;re a blogger is divine. See my post today about the Truthout.Org mess and the Rove indictment that never happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry (your brother)</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-238481</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry (your brother)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/#comment-238481</guid>
		<description>Rick--

As someone said in a movie once: "You never have an egg timer when you need one."

From the Wall Street Journal, June 20.  Third news story:

"The Dow Jones Industrials declined 72.44 to 10942.11 and the S&#38;P 500 fell back into the red for the year on worries about stagflation."

The way the WSJ has changed over the years, I would not look at this as deep economic analysis, but it shows some people are thinking about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick&#8211;</p>
<p>As someone said in a movie once: &#8220;You never have an egg timer when you need one.&#8221;</p>
<p>From the Wall Street Journal, June 20.  Third news story:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Dow Jones Industrials declined 72.44 to 10942.11 and the S&amp;P 500 fell back into the red for the year on worries about stagflation.&#8221;</p>
<p>The way the WSJ has changed over the years, I would not look at this as deep economic analysis, but it shows some people are thinking about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forest hunter</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-235772</link>
		<dc:creator>forest hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 02:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/#comment-235772</guid>
		<description>James and Rick: Thanks for clearing the word in question at the top of the comment section for me. I`ve been telling people the same thing as James said, that there is no such word, irregardless of how many repeat it. Oh the ir of it all!

OT: My time home was short lived and I`m back in Japan. Keep up the good work Rick as your site is one of my reality checkpoints</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James and Rick: Thanks for clearing the word in question at the top of the comment section for me. I`ve been telling people the same thing as James said, that there is no such word, irregardless of how many repeat it. Oh the ir of it all!</p>
<p>OT: My time home was short lived and I`m back in Japan. Keep up the good work Rick as your site is one of my reality checkpoints</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK Moran</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-234679</link>
		<dc:creator>JK Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 03:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/#comment-234679</guid>
		<description>And I truly recognize your frustration with just such a generalization as I made. Certainly your sensitivity to my broad brush stroke - and I am presuming your active engagement with politics that leads you to read and post here - belies the slacker canard casually tossed your way by some of my fellow boomers.

Some generalizations have roots in a partial or perceived reality, which is why I would never take offence at the self-absorption allegation levelled at boomers, even though I don't agree with it. My GenX indictment above was a flippant and frustrated comment that grew from a multitude of experiences with the slacker menrality (and I have been a high school and college teacher for more than 30 years).

Thanks to the entirely appropriate (in my view) umbrage that you took at being lumped into a generalization, I will most assuredly be more careful of the injustice of such statements here and elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I truly recognize your frustration with just such a generalization as I made. Certainly your sensitivity to my broad brush stroke - and I am presuming your active engagement with politics that leads you to read and post here - belies the slacker canard casually tossed your way by some of my fellow boomers.</p>
<p>Some generalizations have roots in a partial or perceived reality, which is why I would never take offence at the self-absorption allegation levelled at boomers, even though I don&#8217;t agree with it. My GenX indictment above was a flippant and frustrated comment that grew from a multitude of experiences with the slacker menrality (and I have been a high school and college teacher for more than 30 years).</p>
<p>Thanks to the entirely appropriate (in my view) umbrage that you took at being lumped into a generalization, I will most assuredly be more careful of the injustice of such statements here and elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-234481</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 00:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/#comment-234481</guid>
		<description>My ribbing about the generational thing is mostly that, but I think it is wise to avoid generalizations.  I'm a bit jaded as I've grown up with boomers telling me what a slacker I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My ribbing about the generational thing is mostly that, but I think it is wise to avoid generalizations.  I&#8217;m a bit jaded as I&#8217;ve grown up with boomers telling me what a slacker I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK Moran</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-234459</link>
		<dc:creator>JK Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 00:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/#comment-234459</guid>
		<description>sorry - the second half of my comments isn't getting posted - after quoting Andy I wrote:

You were welcome to make exactly this sort of generalization even without mine, and I'm sure you know that people have made just such a generalization.

While I of course would not agree with it, it is certainly a point of view worth serious discussion, as the implications of the bb generation aging into retirement are profound for Gen X and everyone else younger.

Rather than attempt a generational defence here and now (might be a good idea at some point for my own blog), I would simply point out on my brother's right wing website that much of the success of the conservative revolution of the last 25 years has been due to these self-same Boomers, the ones who regarded the excesses of the New Left of the late 60s with enough disdain to work for decades to counteract what they regarded as the excesses of a fringe element of their own demographic cohort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry - the second half of my comments isn&#8217;t getting posted - after quoting Andy I wrote:</p>
<p>You were welcome to make exactly this sort of generalization even without mine, and I&#8217;m sure you know that people have made just such a generalization.</p>
<p>While I of course would not agree with it, it is certainly a point of view worth serious discussion, as the implications of the bb generation aging into retirement are profound for Gen X and everyone else younger.</p>
<p>Rather than attempt a generational defence here and now (might be a good idea at some point for my own blog), I would simply point out on my brother&#8217;s right wing website that much of the success of the conservative revolution of the last 25 years has been due to these self-same Boomers, the ones who regarded the excesses of the New Left of the late 60s with enough disdain to work for decades to counteract what they regarded as the excesses of a fringe element of their own demographic cohort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK Moran</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-234456</link>
		<dc:creator>JK Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 00:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/#comment-234456</guid>
		<description>Andy -

&#62;&#62;you still make generational generalizations. I supposed I can therefore make some of my own about the Boomers, who are a bunch of self-centered spoiled brats</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy -</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;you still make generational generalizations. I supposed I can therefore make some of my own about the Boomers, who are a bunch of self-centered spoiled brats</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-234403</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 23:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/#comment-234403</guid>
		<description>OOPS ment George HW Bush</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOPS ment George HW Bush</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-234402</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/#comment-234402</guid>
		<description>I remember they did something similar at the end of George W. Bush's administration after we won the Gulf War.  They attempted to turn two quarters of GNP contraction into "The worst economy since the Great Depression". It wasn't even officially a recession, let alone even near the Carter economic period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember they did something similar at the end of George W. Bush&#8217;s administration after we won the Gulf War.  They attempted to turn two quarters of GNP contraction into &#8220;The worst economy since the Great Depression&#8221;. It wasn&#8217;t even officially a recession, let alone even near the Carter economic period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badge 2211</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-234390</link>
		<dc:creator>Badge 2211</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 22:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/16/la-times-offers-more-proof-why-no-one-bothers-to-read-it-anymore/#comment-234390</guid>
		<description>Okay, anyone up for giving Terry a wedgie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, anyone up for giving Terry a wedgie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
