<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DEMOCRATS GO OUT WITH A WHIMPER ON IRAQ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 04:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing Nut House &#187; APOLOGY ACCEPTED. LET&#8217;S MOVE ON</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-378684</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing Nut House &#187; APOLOGY ACCEPTED. LET&#8217;S MOVE ON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 23:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/#comment-378684</guid>
		<description>[...] Does he expect us to believe that he really wants to implement a &#8220;winning strategy&#8221; in order to &#8220;win&#8221; the war when he has offered a timetable for withdrawal not based on anything except the passage of time? The Senator&#8217;s withdrawal resolution was rejected by the Senate 86-13 and would have required all American troops to pull out of Iraq by July 1, 2007, one year from the date of passage. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does he expect us to believe that he really wants to implement a &#8220;winning strategy&#8221; in order to &#8220;win&#8221; the war when he has offered a timetable for withdrawal not based on anything except the passage of time? The Senator&#8217;s withdrawal resolution was rejected by the Senate 86-13 and would have required all American troops to pull out of Iraq by July 1, 2007, one year from the date of passage. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drewsmom</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-242696</link>
		<dc:creator>Drewsmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 16:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/#comment-242696</guid>
		<description>It made my day to see horse-face kerry get  shot down in flames.

Our objective is to get a sane democracy in a land that is between Iraq and those other nut job countries, if they see the Iraq freedoms, maybe they will want some for themselves and tell the terrorists and Imans (sp) they won't be held hostage by extremism anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It made my day to see horse-face kerry get  shot down in flames.</p>
<p>Our objective is to get a sane democracy in a land that is between Iraq and those other nut job countries, if they see the Iraq freedoms, maybe they will want some for themselves and tell the terrorists and Imans (sp) they won&#8217;t be held hostage by extremism anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oldcrow</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-242156</link>
		<dc:creator>Oldcrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 02:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/#comment-242156</guid>
		<description>My only point of contention with the White House and the Republican Congress, and I guess with you and other conservative bloggers, is the lack of specificity of a stated specific goal for victory in Iraq.
Barry Allen Said:
10:32 pm  

Well Barry I don't know how the REPUBS and President Bush can get anymore specific as Bush and everyone else in the ADMIN and Military has stated the goal is a "stable, free Democratic Iraq able to handle its own security". What else can they say do you expect them to hand over the entire detailed plan to the NY slimes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only point of contention with the White House and the Republican Congress, and I guess with you and other conservative bloggers, is the lack of specificity of a stated specific goal for victory in Iraq.<br />
Barry Allen Said:<br />
10:32 pm  </p>
<p>Well Barry I don&#8217;t know how the REPUBS and President Bush can get anymore specific as Bush and everyone else in the ADMIN and Military has stated the goal is a &#8220;stable, free Democratic Iraq able to handle its own security&#8221;. What else can they say do you expect them to hand over the entire detailed plan to the NY slimes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken McCracken</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-241370</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCracken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/#comment-241370</guid>
		<description>Poor Joe Lieberman.

All he needed to do was hire Jerome Armstrong before Kos found Ned Lamont, and everything would have been wine and roses. 

And it would have even spared Kos from that Mentos commercial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Joe Lieberman.</p>
<p>All he needed to do was hire Jerome Armstrong before Kos found Ned Lamont, and everything would have been wine and roses. </p>
<p>And it would have even spared Kos from that Mentos commercial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-241338</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/#comment-241338</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;My only point of contention with the White House and the Republican Congress, and I guess with you and other conservative bloggers, is the lack of specificity of a stated specific goal for victory in Iraq.&lt;/i&gt;

I will speak for myself and say that when the government of Iraq is able to assume the security situation in all provinces and informs us that the last of our troops are no longer needed, the victory has been won.

That process started today when Iraq assumed 100% control of Muthanna province and we announced that ALL multinational forces were being redeployed out of the province.  Province by province, Iraq will take control of the situation and we will no longer be needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My only point of contention with the White House and the Republican Congress, and I guess with you and other conservative bloggers, is the lack of specificity of a stated specific goal for victory in Iraq.</i></p>
<p>I will speak for myself and say that when the government of Iraq is able to assume the security situation in all provinces and informs us that the last of our troops are no longer needed, the victory has been won.</p>
<p>That process started today when Iraq assumed 100% control of Muthanna province and we announced that ALL multinational forces were being redeployed out of the province.  Province by province, Iraq will take control of the situation and we will no longer be needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Allen</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-241101</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 03:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/#comment-241101</guid>
		<description>Rick, though I don't consider myself a conservative and am not a registered Republican( in political beliefs I'm more along the lines of a 'Schwarzenneger Republican', liberal on social issues, conservative on fiscal), I'm not in disagreement with you about the Dems on the Iraq War.
My only point of contention with the White House and the Republican Congress, and I guess with you and other conservative bloggers, is the lack of specificity of a stated specific goal for victory in Iraq.
I'm not being facetious. Honestly, could you state for me what America's goal is in Iraq?
And I don't mean: "As Iraqis stand up, we'll stand down", "Victory Over the Terrorists", "Freedom and Democracy in Iraq".
While they sound nice, it's just rhetoric and  they don't essentially MEAN anything.
Think of WWII, where the goal was "the unconditional surrender of the Axis powers". It was an actual target, a goal, a bulls-eye to hit.
For example, is the goal in Iraq for the unconditional surrender of Al-Qaeda in Iraq?  The unconditional surrender of all militias?
The surrender of all ex-Baathists, Iraqi mafia gangsters, etc?
What then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick, though I don&#8217;t consider myself a conservative and am not a registered Republican( in political beliefs I&#8217;m more along the lines of a &#8216;Schwarzenneger Republican&#8217;, liberal on social issues, conservative on fiscal), I&#8217;m not in disagreement with you about the Dems on the Iraq War.<br />
My only point of contention with the White House and the Republican Congress, and I guess with you and other conservative bloggers, is the lack of specificity of a stated specific goal for victory in Iraq.<br />
I&#8217;m not being facetious. Honestly, could you state for me what America&#8217;s goal is in Iraq?<br />
And I don&#8217;t mean: &#8220;As Iraqis stand up, we&#8217;ll stand down&#8221;, &#8220;Victory Over the Terrorists&#8221;, &#8220;Freedom and Democracy in Iraq&#8221;.<br />
While they sound nice, it&#8217;s just rhetoric and  they don&#8217;t essentially MEAN anything.<br />
Think of WWII, where the goal was &#8220;the unconditional surrender of the Axis powers&#8221;. It was an actual target, a goal, a bulls-eye to hit.<br />
For example, is the goal in Iraq for the unconditional surrender of Al-Qaeda in Iraq?  The unconditional surrender of all militias?<br />
The surrender of all ex-Baathists, Iraqi mafia gangsters, etc?<br />
What then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joust The Facts</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-241079</link>
		<dc:creator>Joust The Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 03:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/#comment-241079</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Murtha's Proposals Go Down&lt;/strong&gt;

Mr. Murtha's recommendation to get American troops out of Iraq, seconded by John Kerry, was voted on twice today in the Senate in two different forms. Going down to defeat by 86-13 was a hard timetable to pull all troops</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Murtha&#8217;s Proposals Go Down</strong></p>
<p>Mr. Murtha&#8217;s recommendation to get American troops out of Iraq, seconded by John Kerry, was voted on twice today in the Senate in two different forms. Going down to defeat by 86-13 was a hard timetable to pull all troops</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Cut N&#8217; Run Bills</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-240968</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Cut N&#8217; Run Bills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/#comment-240968</guid>
		<description>[...] Right Wing Nut House [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Right Wing Nut House [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrapion</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-240910</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrapion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/#comment-240910</guid>
		<description>People of conviction they ain't. pun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People of conviction they ain&#8217;t. pun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PartisanTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-240857</link>
		<dc:creator>PartisanTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/06/22/democrats-go-out-with-a-whimper-on-iraq/#comment-240857</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kerry's Flip Gets Flopped In The Senate&lt;/strong&gt;

In a vote that can be described as anything but close, the Senate overwhelmingly defeated a John Kerry inspired bill that called for an immediate troop withdrawal from Iraq. The Washington Post reports:Senators . . . voted 86-13 to defeat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kerry&#8217;s Flip Gets Flopped In The Senate</strong></p>
<p>In a vote that can be described as anything but close, the Senate overwhelmingly defeated a John Kerry inspired bill that called for an immediate troop withdrawal from Iraq. The Washington Post reports:Senators . . . voted 86-13 to defeat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
