Shaw has done us the great disservice of defining “terrorism” downward in much the same way another idealist, Andrew Sullivan, has defined “torture” downward to include discomfort and mild humiliation in another attempt to twist emotionally charged words to fit their agendas.

I was merely commenting on how I found Mr. Moran’s exasperation with Shaw more humorous than I found Shaw’s obvious idiocy.

And I stand by my original post. It only takes one line to completely humiliate a fool.

Well… I agree, but then I don’t.

Rick will not convince Shaw of his own ignorance. That, I agree, is completly pointless. You have obviously had your share of attempting to debate leftists and have come to the same conclusion as I, that it is a total waste of time. They live in a parallel universe where right is wrong and wrong is right, and nothing can get through.

BUT, Rick as an audience, and there are a bunch of so-called moderate “swing vote” people out there who don’t pay much attention to politics except at election time. There also may be a lot of Democrats who are not comfortable with Shaw’s irrationality.

So I guess my point is, Rick is not speaking to you. He’s speaking to the fence-sitters, and his contribution of pointing out the ignorance can make a difference.

There is only one way to respond rationally to irrationality. IGNORE it.

I realize you feel the need to expose how unbelievably ignorant this sad joke passing as a man is, but he’s already doing a fine job of that himself.

I’m reminded on an incident on the Academy Awards many years ago. David Niven was presenting an award when this streaker ran naked across the stage behind him. Without missing a beat, Niven looked directly into the camera and said, “What some people won’t do to expose their shortcomings.” Now that was funny.

So the next time this imbecile mouths off, don’t try to analyze his excrutiatingly illogical comments. Just post them and then shred them with a single comment.

It only takes one line to completely humiliate a fool.