Comments on: CAR RAMPAGE IN SAN FRANCISCO

By: swissreplica8

swissreplica8 — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:51:02 +0000

very best idea make rules time!

By: Drewsmom

Drewsmom — Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:41:10 +0000

I heard he had gone to Afganistan to get married and his bride had to stay due to paperwork to get her over and he was pissed off. THAT IS PROBABLY WHY HE WENT OUT LOOKIN FOR AMERICANS TO RUN OVER.
I am sure he will get a dem attorney funded by cair and they will use the insanity bit when the truth is he was a MUSLIM, not a typical sane Muslim, but a Muslim, just the same who went out and ran over people ON PURPOSE.

By: Rick Moran

Rick Moran — Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:15:34 +0000

I find it fascinating that the last two commenters didn’t bother to read the post:

The car rampage yesterday in San Francisco may or may not be a case of Sudden Jihad Syndrome. We just donâ€™t know. While there has been much excellent reporting and some intelligent speculation (did the killer know where the Jewish center was?) there have also been some shocking leaps of illogic and even some examples of good old fashioned American bigotry at work in a few of the posts Iâ€™ve seen this morning.

Yep…jumping to conclusions allright.

Why don’t both of you guys close your mouths when you breathe and learn how to read. Then you can come back here and play with the grown ups.

By: Jason

Jason — Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:40:09 +0000

Are you jumping to conlusions? Yes, you ignorant shit. I live a few blocks from the JCC. This guy was not targeting Jews. He was crazy. He was running over people all over town. The fact you jumped to these conclusions reveals more about you than the Left or the Media. It reveals your wet dream for a holy war. You right-wing retard.

By: Jim Treacher

Jim Treacher — Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:09:33 +0000

TBogg isn’t antisemitic. Just anti-impulse control.

By: Franz

Franz — Thu, 31 Aug 2006 02:14:26 +0000

Is it not beyond the realm of possibility for the blogger to admit that sometimes people do impulsive, irrational acts because they are just pure CRAZY? I bet my two cents that this guy has a history of mental illness or else simply went off his rocker; if a woman kills her children because she thinks she needs to save them from the devil, does that make her a religious-fanatic-terrorist? Gracious! It seems sometimes like you wingnuts don’t even know how to SPELL P-E-R-S-P-E-C-T-I-V-E.

By: Tom Hilton

Tom Hilton — Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:22:19 +0000

This was not a car â€œdriving into a crowd.â€ This was a guy driving around town looking for people to hit.

People who have nothing at all in common apart from being (mostly) pedestrians. Black, white, Asian; male, female; young, old; there just isn’t any kind of common characteristic that he seemed to be targeting.

Except, as I said, that all but one were pedestrians. If this was ‘terrorism’, it was the standard garden-variety terrorism practiced by drivers against pedestrians. And sadly, this nation has yet to declare war on that kind of terror.

By: brad

brad — Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:02:51 +0000

I like how you’re calling it 9/11+5 to remind all them folks a recent poll shows can’t remember the year it happened.
But, a couple problems. First, if you’re going to say we should wait on the facts, an admirable goal, shouldn’t you say that before already labelling the case in question an act of terrorism? Otherwise, you’re just covering your ass to sound more reasonable while still doing exactly what you criticize. Also, you forgot to mention the Seattle attacker was, at the least, somewhere between christian and muslim, having professed belief in both at points in his life. Of course, mentioning that would complicate calling every act of violence by a muslim a terrorist act, which you are, as you take pains to be politically correct and say, in no way shape or form supporting doing, aside from in the first half of this post.
And how, exactly, is tbogg anti-semitic? Or how is the post you link to anti-semitic? Because it features a picture of Hasidim? Because it quotes a joke from Annie Hall about anti-semitism? Because it implies that jewish delis tend to be of a high quality? Inquiring minds want to know.

By: Rick Moran

Rick Moran — Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:59:22 +0000

Violence committed in the name of a political or religious agenda is terrorism no matter who does it.

And nowhere in the piece do I say that all Muslims or even a majority are terrorists. In fact, I specifically take some on the right to task for making such a ridiculous and bigoted assumption.

Those “misguided beliefs” are shared by jihadists all over the world. They are not simply his own. If he’s a lone nut, does that mitigate the fact that his inspiration came from people who would just as soon behead you as give you the time of day?

I just want the language we use to describe the threats we face accurately and forthrightly. Are we threatened by Christian crusaders? Or Islamic extremists?

The cold eyed killers who plot the murder of abortionists are just as much a terrorist as Popal. And we have no problem referring to them as domestic terrorists - and if we do that’s a problem also. But it is unlikely that the abortion terrorists will branch off and start killing people in the street (far away from any clinic). Thus, the threat from Islamist terrorism is pervasive while the threat from abortion terrorists is highly localized.

Not a difference in severity of the crime but a difference in the degree of the threat. And if we’re going to call domestic terrorists by their proper name - someone wrote yesterday what would Mayor Newsome be saying if it had been 15 gay people run down - then all terrorism should be identified and accepted as a threat.

By: Islamofacist Moonbat Clinton-lover

Islamofacist Moonbat Clinton-lover — Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:58:48 +0000

I just pooped in someone’s backyard.

…scatological terrorism. Cower in fear, infidels.

Honestly, is this the dumbest Pajamaline blog, or do I have to keep searching?