<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9/11 TIN FOIL HATS ARE MELTING</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shane Gibson</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/comment-page-1/#comment-1369105</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/#comment-1369105</guid>
		<description>Wow! That's a nice bit of Liable you've written there! How about producing some facts instead of insults and dribble? It seems that's all you Neo Cons are capable of anymore. How about you do us Republicans a favor and get your lying, over spending liberal a$$es out of our party? At one time I thought there was nothing worse than a Democrap, but right in our midst was the enemy the whole time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! That&#8217;s a nice bit of Liable you&#8217;ve written there! How about producing some facts instead of insults and dribble? It seems that&#8217;s all you Neo Cons are capable of anymore. How about you do us Republicans a favor and get your lying, over spending liberal a$$es out of our party? At one time I thought there was nothing worse than a Democrap, but right in our midst was the enemy the whole time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rugs</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/comment-page-1/#comment-612420</link>
		<dc:creator>Rugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/#comment-612420</guid>
		<description>I could see how it happened the day it happened before any expert analysis. If you watch the footage the buildings start to collapse at the entry points of the planes. The heat from the burning jet fuel weakens the beams that make up the internal structure, the beams that hold the floor above it up. Of course the windows of the floors below blow out as the floors above collapses on them. If you stomp on a milk carton the sides blow out. That doesnâ€™t prove there were explosives in the milk carton, and if it had dust in it â€œsmokeâ€ would blow out the â€œexplodingâ€ sides. This whole argument is surreal. Someone says â€œthere was no wreckageâ€ and that becomes a â€œFactâ€ that needs to be refuted. There is a simple explanations, passenger planes hit the building weakening there structure and they collapsed taking some adjacent buildings with them, and a complex answer including hundreds if not thousands of conspirators and multiple and even inexplicable types of aircrafts.  In the complex explanation conspirators would have had to carry out their plan in a building full of enough people that it needed its own zip code without being noticed. We all need to pick an explanation.  Anyone ever heard of occam's razor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see how it happened the day it happened before any expert analysis. If you watch the footage the buildings start to collapse at the entry points of the planes. The heat from the burning jet fuel weakens the beams that make up the internal structure, the beams that hold the floor above it up. Of course the windows of the floors below blow out as the floors above collapses on them. If you stomp on a milk carton the sides blow out. That doesnâ€™t prove there were explosives in the milk carton, and if it had dust in it â€œsmokeâ€ would blow out the â€œexplodingâ€ sides. This whole argument is surreal. Someone says â€œthere was no wreckageâ€ and that becomes a â€œFactâ€ that needs to be refuted. There is a simple explanations, passenger planes hit the building weakening there structure and they collapsed taking some adjacent buildings with them, and a complex answer including hundreds if not thousands of conspirators and multiple and even inexplicable types of aircrafts.  In the complex explanation conspirators would have had to carry out their plan in a building full of enough people that it needed its own zip code without being noticed. We all need to pick an explanation.  Anyone ever heard of occam&#8217;s razor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No North American Union!</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/comment-page-1/#comment-493701</link>
		<dc:creator>No North American Union!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 05:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/#comment-493701</guid>
		<description>Article on superthermite: 

"Nanotechnology is grabbing headlines for its potential in advancing the life sciences and computing research, but the Department of Defense (DoD) found another use: a new class of weaponry that uses energy-packed nanometals to create powerful, compact bombs.

With funding from the U.S. government, Sandia National Laboratories, the Los Alamos National Laboratory, and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory are researching how to manipulate the flow of energy within and between molecules, a field known as nanoenergentics, which enables building more lethal weapons such as "cave-buster bombs" that have several times the detonation force of conventional bombs such as the "daisy cutter" or MOAB (mother of all bombs).

Researchers can greatly increase the power of weapons by adding materials known as superthermites that combine nanometals such as nanoaluminum with metal oxides such as iron oxide, according to Steven Son, a project leader in the Explosives Science and Technology group at Los Alamos."

http://www.wistech.org/2005/01/superthermite_b.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article on superthermite: </p>
<p>&#8220;Nanotechnology is grabbing headlines for its potential in advancing the life sciences and computing research, but the Department of Defense (DoD) found another use: a new class of weaponry that uses energy-packed nanometals to create powerful, compact bombs.</p>
<p>With funding from the U.S. government, Sandia National Laboratories, the Los Alamos National Laboratory, and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory are researching how to manipulate the flow of energy within and between molecules, a field known as nanoenergentics, which enables building more lethal weapons such as &#8220;cave-buster bombs&#8221; that have several times the detonation force of conventional bombs such as the &#8220;daisy cutter&#8221; or MOAB (mother of all bombs).</p>
<p>Researchers can greatly increase the power of weapons by adding materials known as superthermites that combine nanometals such as nanoaluminum with metal oxides such as iron oxide, according to Steven Son, a project leader in the Explosives Science and Technology group at Los Alamos.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wistech.org/2005/01/superthermite_b.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wistech.org/2005/01/superthermite_b.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/comment-page-1/#comment-446233</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/#comment-446233</guid>
		<description>"Given the witnesses, no, we cannot agree on that"
...would that be the same witnesses who claim the aircraft skimmed across the lawn (undamaged, not a scratch) before striking the building (Pentagon)
"Given the parts recovered from the sceneâ€”of both the aircraft and the victimsâ€”no, we cannot agree on that."
...there was a piece of fuselage and a few bodys, clearly not enuf wreckage to verify a jumbo passenger jet crashed there, oh I forgot, they 'vaporize' on imapct, just like on the wiley e coyote cartoons huh?

"Youâ€™re an idiot. A lunatic. Youâ€™re the type of person who shouldnâ€™t be trusted with a spoon."

...anybody who believes the 'official story' shouldn't be trusted with a spoon I'd say, c'mon call me some more names...reminds me of the days on the playground, kinda' cute...wise up fella' we have been lied to and we all bought it, hook line and sinker, for awhile anyhow...it won't be long and this whole 9/11 coverup will be blown wide open, and it will not be a good thing I don't think...the truth always comes out eventually, no matter who controls the evidence...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Given the witnesses, no, we cannot agree on that&#8221;<br />
&#8230;would that be the same witnesses who claim the aircraft skimmed across the lawn (undamaged, not a scratch) before striking the building (Pentagon)<br />
&#8220;Given the parts recovered from the sceneâ€”of both the aircraft and the victimsâ€”no, we cannot agree on that.&#8221;<br />
&#8230;there was a piece of fuselage and a few bodys, clearly not enuf wreckage to verify a jumbo passenger jet crashed there, oh I forgot, they &#8216;vaporize&#8217; on imapct, just like on the wiley e coyote cartoons huh?</p>
<p>&#8220;Youâ€™re an idiot. A lunatic. Youâ€™re the type of person who shouldnâ€™t be trusted with a spoon.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;anybody who believes the &#8216;official story&#8217; shouldn&#8217;t be trusted with a spoon I&#8217;d say, c&#8217;mon call me some more names&#8230;reminds me of the days on the playground, kinda&#8217; cute&#8230;wise up fella&#8217; we have been lied to and we all bought it, hook line and sinker, for awhile anyhow&#8230;it won&#8217;t be long and this whole 9/11 coverup will be blown wide open, and it will not be a good thing I don&#8217;t think&#8230;the truth always comes out eventually, no matter who controls the evidence&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goerge</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/comment-page-1/#comment-441362</link>
		<dc:creator>Goerge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/#comment-441362</guid>
		<description>*no matter how</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*no matter how</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goerge</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/comment-page-1/#comment-441361</link>
		<dc:creator>Goerge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/#comment-441361</guid>
		<description>The title of your site says it all.

Who was it again that admitted that building 7 was demolished? Why is it that it looks like the twin towers fell the same way that building 7 did? That is, at near free fall speed into their own footprint? Instead of basing your judgements on speculation look at evidence no matter no circumstantial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title of your site says it all.</p>
<p>Who was it again that admitted that building 7 was demolished? Why is it that it looks like the twin towers fell the same way that building 7 did? That is, at near free fall speed into their own footprint? Instead of basing your judgements on speculation look at evidence no matter no circumstantial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hat</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/comment-page-1/#comment-348677</link>
		<dc:creator>hat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 20:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/#comment-348677</guid>
		<description>I felt good about this post.   It confirmed for me some of the things Iâ€™ve been thinking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt good about this post.   It confirmed for me some of the things Iâ€™ve been thinking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proudliberal</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/comment-page-1/#comment-332808</link>
		<dc:creator>proudliberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/#comment-332808</guid>
		<description>Why do so many Bush supporters vehemently oppose the true facts about 9/11, ie. Marvin Bush being the head of WTC security until 9/11/01, when John P. O'Neil (a Bush adversary) takes over and dies in the WTC on his first day on the job. Marvin Bush also sitting on the board of one of the insurance companies that stood to reap rewards from the destruction of the WTC building - building were insured 6 weeks before 9/11 with a special clause that stated that the owner, Larry Silverstein would not have to pay any more of the 99-year lease in the even of a terrorist attack. The WTC falling at near freefall speed; this defies physics, unless there are explosives to destroy the support beams and floors of the towers. The list goes on an on.  How can you continue to support George W. Bush?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do so many Bush supporters vehemently oppose the true facts about 9/11, ie. Marvin Bush being the head of WTC security until 9/11/01, when John P. O&#8217;Neil (a Bush adversary) takes over and dies in the WTC on his first day on the job. Marvin Bush also sitting on the board of one of the insurance companies that stood to reap rewards from the destruction of the WTC building - building were insured 6 weeks before 9/11 with a special clause that stated that the owner, Larry Silverstein would not have to pay any more of the 99-year lease in the even of a terrorist attack. The WTC falling at near freefall speed; this defies physics, unless there are explosives to destroy the support beams and floors of the towers. The list goes on an on.  How can you continue to support George W. Bush?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/comment-page-1/#comment-330863</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/#comment-330863</guid>
		<description>[...] 9/11 Tin Foil Hats Are MeltingRight Wing Nut House [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9/11 Tin Foil Hats Are MeltingRight Wing Nut House [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Highwayman</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/comment-page-1/#comment-324053</link>
		<dc:creator>Highwayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/09/03/911-tin-foil-hats-are-melting/#comment-324053</guid>
		<description>I particularly enjoyed the musings of Professor Jones who maintains that flourine and zinc should not have been present in the building materials. First, the building were not empty, they were poacked with all kinds of office furniture, carpets and supplies which may have been the source of the materials. Second, the building is comprised of many more componenets than mere steel, concrete and glass. Zinc for one is commonly used in the coating of fasteners, duct work &#38; other items.

I hope that someone sent him the requisite roll of extra heavy duty aluminum foil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I particularly enjoyed the musings of Professor Jones who maintains that flourine and zinc should not have been present in the building materials. First, the building were not empty, they were poacked with all kinds of office furniture, carpets and supplies which may have been the source of the materials. Second, the building is comprised of many more componenets than mere steel, concrete and glass. Zinc for one is commonly used in the coating of fasteners, duct work &amp; other items.</p>
<p>I hope that someone sent him the requisite roll of extra heavy duty aluminum foil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
