Man, how far the GOoPers come from “Wanted Dead or Alive”, eh?

Americans would have to be completely out of their friggin minds if they expect GOP leadership to keep us safe from terrorism (or energy crises, or global warming, or health care problems, or pretty much anything….)

Rule #2: Properly identify the enemy. It seems Pakistan may be a greater threat to us than Iraq ever could be.

Rule #3: Don’t underestimate your enemy. If we felt we had to invade Iraq, we should have gone in with extreme force and not with the bare minimum force we invaded with.

When I engage an intelligent liberal - as I have on numerous occassions - it is a pleasure.

Jesus on a cracker! Then you turn around and make the same kind of imbecilic generalization. I can write, “But that’s typical rightwing stupidity – over generalizing when someone disagrees with them”, and it rings just as true. Comments sections are usually about 90% stupid generalizing, and, on a good day, 10% serious worthwhile debate.

You are quite right. We should have tried harder to finish the job in Afghanistan.

dubya

We are not going to invade Iran right now. We don’t currently have the stomach to handle Pakistan or Lebanon right now, much less Iran. We helped force a cease fire on Israel and we did not act to prevent Pakistan’s surrender.

While we are not going to invade Iran Israel may. They may soon have no other choice. I just hope we stay out of their way when they do.

on to tehran! heh-heh

Rule #1 in military conflict: FINISH THE JOB.

Wow! All kinds of reaction on the peace agreement between Pakistan and the Taliban this morning. Raw Story quotes ABC news as reporting that Major General Shaukat Sultan Khan, press secretary to the president of Pakistan, as stating Osama bin Laden …

The idea that all we needed to capture Bin Laden was a greater effort or more boots on the ground is proved wrong with this agreement by Musharaf.

He had 80,000 men in Waziristan and couldn’t deal with a couple of thousand Taliban and al-Qaeda fighters. The terrain is among the most forbidding on earth. And if we had 135,000 men looking for Saddam in Iraq and only found him through blind luck, imagine how much more secure Bin Laden is - regardless of who is President or what ideological nonsense you want to spout - whever he is. Which may or may not be in Pakistan.

Get real, buddy. And if you’re going to criticize me, at least have the intelligence to read a little of what I’ve been saying about Bush. Your laughably ridiculous and ignorant assertion that I’m some kind of “blind Republican” falls apart if you bother to read about 3 posts on this blog.

But that’s typical lefty stupidity - over generalizing when someone disagrees with them.