Clinton blasts 9/11 film, amid report of changes Spin, spin, spin, you worthless gladhanding used car salesman. Your accomodationist, anything to avoid confrontation policy are more responsible for 9/11 than any other single cause. Your unwillingness …

Nowhere in the film is there any reference whatsoever to Saddam having WMD.

You are an ignoramous. It is laughably obvious you never saw the film. Please never come here again. I’m the only one who is allowed to make a fool of themselves here.

As for the “cultural domination” quote…you’re kidding right? Do you live under a rock?

Also, somewhere on this site I saw someone making reference to the US of A’s “cultural domination” amongst other dominating characteristics. Do you ever wonder how this kind of hubris is received by the rest of the world?

The current administration has already had it happen to them, with “Fahrenheit 9/11″ and Rathergate coming immediately to mind. The current Bush assasination-fantasy movie doesn’t help things. It’s interesting that Bush has to put up with this crap on a daily basis, I haven’t heard him complain. St. Bill and his cohorts, on the other hand, is whining over what is essentially a factual criticism. I’m finding his reaction over-the-top, to say the least.

From what I’ve read, the Bush administration is hardly treated with kid gloves in “Path”. I’d like to see the film and make my own judgement.

Clinton blasts 9/11 film, amid report of changes

Spin, spin, spin, you worthless gladhanding used car salesman. Your accomodationist, anything to …

I think it is alot paranoid to suggest the Democrats are threatening to pull anyone’s license.

First, they didn’t say that in the letter, just reminded the broadcasters that they have a public responsibility for accuracy that goes along with their use of public airwaves.

Second, as previously pointed out, they do not have the power to accomplish a license denial.

And tongueboy, if you’re going to label me, make it “critically thinking US citizen”. Not everyone who questions the fights the Right chooses to engage, or the tactics they use, is a Leftie. If a team member says to the coach “This play doesn’t work.” it does not make him a member of the other team.

I question whether capital should be expended for the right to tell a story as fact, that is highly controversial if it even happened (I speak now of the we have OBL surrounded and Clinton won’t let us kill him portion of the broadcast).

What does it say about the Right’s message that we have to fight to use possible lies to tell it?

Do you mean by this the following? Docudramas must construct dialogue that perhaps never actually took place but that still communicates a state of existing facts, opinions, or policy. The difference is therefore that the current drama accurately conveys such things as Clinton’s view that terrorism should be treated as a law-enforcement matter, but the Reagan drama inaccurately portrayed Reagan as a homophobe, etc. Or am I missing other points?

Also, I don’t see the Democrat’s threat to ABC’s broadcasting license as terribly serious. To me, a subtle left-wing campaign to silence talk radio is what we should be looking out for.

Probably not but, following the precedent set by the Republican outrage over the Reagan mini-series, they would refrain from references to “the Communications Act of 1934″ or “trustees of the public airwaves”. Edward G. Robinson could have learned something from this crew. And the lefties go 0-2 on this thread as Beachbum Bob was unable to make this distinction, either.