<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: COULD FORDHAM BE SOURCE FOR  EMAILS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 06:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SlimGuy</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-342920</link>
		<dc:creator>SlimGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 02:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/#comment-342920</guid>
		<description>Rick

You I believe are confusing "THE LIST" with the list of people Rodgers has displayed on the left side of his website.

The ones on the website are those he has already outed and appear at different points in his blog history

The List is outings that have not occurred yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick</p>
<p>You I believe are confusing &#8220;THE LIST&#8221; with the list of people Rodgers has displayed on the left side of his website.</p>
<p>The ones on the website are those he has already outed and appear at different points in his blog history</p>
<p>The List is outings that have not occurred yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-342622</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/#comment-342622</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rural Voters Appear Unswayed by Foley Scandal&lt;/strong&gt;

The scandal involving former Rep. Mark Foley's (R-FL) contact with congressional pages seems to stri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rural Voters Appear Unswayed by Foley Scandal</strong></p>
<p>The scandal involving former Rep. Mark Foley&#8217;s (R-FL) contact with congressional pages seems to stri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-342603</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 17:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/#comment-342603</guid>
		<description>The Drudge hare has proved to be total bs, as was obvious to anyone with an atom of commonsense. Hastert claims, evidently bought by some of our more enthusiastic conspiracy theorists, that Clinton and Jewish merchant bankers are orchestrating this only expose the Republican party and anyone espousing this to ridicule. They are simply reinforcing the majority that we are nuts. In that direction does not lie salvation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Drudge hare has proved to be total bs, as was obvious to anyone with an atom of commonsense. Hastert claims, evidently bought by some of our more enthusiastic conspiracy theorists, that Clinton and Jewish merchant bankers are orchestrating this only expose the Republican party and anyone espousing this to ridicule. They are simply reinforcing the majority that we are nuts. In that direction does not lie salvation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right Nation</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-342487</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/#comment-342487</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Foleygate (Open) Must-Read List&lt;/strong&gt;

Worst October Surprise, Ever - Patrick Godfrey, The American Thinker; Nothing New Under the Sun - Dean Barnett, Townhall; Democrats' Plan to Out Gay Republicans - Rush Limbaugh, RushLimbaugh.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Foleygate (Open) Must-Read List</strong></p>
<p>Worst October Surprise, Ever - Patrick Godfrey, The American Thinker; Nothing New Under the Sun - Dean Barnett, Townhall; Democrats&#8217; Plan to Out Gay Republicans - Rush Limbaugh, RushLimbaugh.com&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pajamas Media</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-342306</link>
		<dc:creator>Pajamas Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/#comment-342306</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Congressional Page Scandal 8 (October 6, 2006)&lt;/strong&gt;

 News Owner of StopSexPredators responds by email to CNN inquires from an anonymous address posted on the Web site. "My plans are to remain anonymous for the foreseeable future," the Web site's owner wrote in an e-mail. "I've been...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Congressional Page Scandal 8 (October 6, 2006)</strong></p>
<p> News Owner of StopSexPredators responds by email to CNN inquires from an anonymous address posted on the Web site. &#8220;My plans are to remain anonymous for the foreseeable future,&#8221; the Web site&#8217;s owner wrote in an e-mail. &#8220;I&#8217;ve been&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drewsmom</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-342277</link>
		<dc:creator>Drewsmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 10:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/#comment-342277</guid>
		<description>utopia, go back to kos land, its more euphoric there, we know the media had a hand in this assisted by soros and all his mega bucks, he was probably behind that display of socialist students at columbia university when the attacked ths stage when the head of the Minutemen was there to speak.  They also had a black speaker who did get his talk in but they called him the n word and held up arabic signs saying NO ONE IS ILLEGAL, to hell you say, but anyway, so much for free speech at columbia.  Moonbat socialists, how pitiful their parents are forking over mega bucks for their educations but bet their parents are moonbats too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>utopia, go back to kos land, its more euphoric there, we know the media had a hand in this assisted by soros and all his mega bucks, he was probably behind that display of socialist students at columbia university when the attacked ths stage when the head of the Minutemen was there to speak.  They also had a black speaker who did get his talk in but they called him the n word and held up arabic signs saying NO ONE IS ILLEGAL, to hell you say, but anyway, so much for free speech at columbia.  Moonbat socialists, how pitiful their parents are forking over mega bucks for their educations but bet their parents are moonbats too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Search Of Utopia</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-341984</link>
		<dc:creator>In Search Of Utopia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 01:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/#comment-341984</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How low is LOW?&lt;/strong&gt;

Lets see... Blame the media did not work. Deny we knew anything did not work. Blame it on the gays did not work... Did you expect them to give up? From Drudge CLAIM: FILTHY FOLEY ONLINE CHATS WERE PAGE 'PRANK...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How low is LOW?</strong></p>
<p>Lets see&#8230; Blame the media did not work. Deny we knew anything did not work. Blame it on the gays did not work&#8230; Did you expect them to give up? From Drudge CLAIM: FILTHY FOLEY ONLINE CHATS WERE PAGE &#8216;PRANK&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron droz</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-341903</link>
		<dc:creator>ron droz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/#comment-341903</guid>
		<description>THE THREE PRANKSTERS PROVIDED "THREE 
VERBAL ACCOUNTS"---WHERE ARE THE E-MAILS/MESSAGES? WHAT DID THESE 3 DO ABOUT THE ALLEGED APPROACHES?
DON'T BUY EVERYTHING DEAR BRIAN PUTS OUT THERE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE THREE PRANKSTERS PROVIDED &#8220;THREE<br />
VERBAL ACCOUNTS&#8221;&#8212;WHERE ARE THE E-MAILS/MESSAGES? WHAT DID THESE 3 DO ABOUT THE ALLEGED APPROACHES?<br />
DON&#8217;T BUY EVERYTHING DEAR BRIAN PUTS OUT THERE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.Poster</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-341896</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Poster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/#comment-341896</guid>
		<description>Foley has resigned in disgrace.  He is gone and this is a good thing for the country.  It seems Dennis Hastert and the House leadership knew about this and did not do enough to act.  At a minimum, Hastert should resign.  We expect or should expect much better of our elected representatives than they have have given us.  It seems the House leadership knew about this.  A complete investigation needs to be done on this and the chips should be allowed to fall where they may.  In any event, the Republican party, as it currently is, is unworthy of the positions they currently hold and I expect the voters to vote them out of office this November.  When this happens, they have no one to blame but themselves.  They fully deserve to lose.  

Rank and file Republicans would do much better, if they would simply own up to the mistakes of the leaders and purge them from their midst, however, I don't expect them to do this.  This would require a level of integrity that they don't seem to possess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foley has resigned in disgrace.  He is gone and this is a good thing for the country.  It seems Dennis Hastert and the House leadership knew about this and did not do enough to act.  At a minimum, Hastert should resign.  We expect or should expect much better of our elected representatives than they have have given us.  It seems the House leadership knew about this.  A complete investigation needs to be done on this and the chips should be allowed to fall where they may.  In any event, the Republican party, as it currently is, is unworthy of the positions they currently hold and I expect the voters to vote them out of office this November.  When this happens, they have no one to blame but themselves.  They fully deserve to lose.  </p>
<p>Rank and file Republicans would do much better, if they would simply own up to the mistakes of the leaders and purge them from their midst, however, I don&#8217;t expect them to do this.  This would require a level of integrity that they don&#8217;t seem to possess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-341883</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/10/05/could-fordham-be-source-for-emails/#comment-341883</guid>
		<description>Uh, you'll have to do better than Mac, who is the #1 source of crazy, half-baked bull hooey on the conservative blogosphere this side of the Free Republic.

I wonder what Drudge has to say about &lt;a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/10/three_more_form.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;these three pranksters.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, you&#8217;ll have to do better than Mac, who is the #1 source of crazy, half-baked bull hooey on the conservative blogosphere this side of the Free Republic.</p>
<p>I wonder what Drudge has to say about <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/10/three_more_form.html" rel="nofollow">these three pranksters.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
