<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: APOLOGY ACCEPTED. LET&#8217;S MOVE ON</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: larry in los angeles</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-381290</link>
		<dc:creator>larry in los angeles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/#comment-381290</guid>
		<description>To: SAHMmy

Can you believe it? 
I do my best to expose these bloated pretenders.

Banned but not out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To: SAHMmy</p>
<p>Can you believe it?<br />
I do my best to expose these bloated pretenders.</p>
<p>Banned but not out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAHMmy</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-381254</link>
		<dc:creator>SAHMmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 00:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/#comment-381254</guid>
		<description>The illusions of grandeur some moonbats have is staggering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The illusions of grandeur some moonbats have is staggering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry in los angeles</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-379931</link>
		<dc:creator>larry in los angeles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/#comment-379931</guid>
		<description>To: Deagle

 I have nothing to be ashamed of. I did not vote for George W. Bush, ever! Your own words prove my point. It is obvious that you think Clintonâ€™s lies were more harmful to this country than the Bush lies that led to three thousand Americans dying in Iraq. You actually believe this folly to be rational thought. You are probably just the kind of guy who would have laughed at Bushâ€™s vulgar joke about not finding WMDs under his desk even as our troops on his orders were dying looking for those very weapons. You are stuck on what a twenty something year old said thirty five years ago even as this mature in age President claims that he would do it all over again regarding Iraq, knowing what he knows now. Republicans that I worked with during the nineties wanted Clinton impeached during his FIRST term. The Right wanted to impeach him evermore when he attacked Ben Ladenâ€™s terrorist camps. They showed an extreme lack of insight when they accused Bill of dropping Lewinsky bombs even as the bad guys schemed against us. 
 The reality is that for every Clinton lie that you can come up with I can give you five Bush lies and he still has two years to go. With all due respect the shame should be all yours. You are stuck on stupid about the past of Democrats even as you are blind about the present incompetence exhibited by this Administration. It was this president who sent our brave young people off to battle without the proper armor (on a pack of lies). How many lives did that cost America? Where is your outrage? Youâ€™re stuck!
 I donâ€™t whine. I educate and smack down partisan hacks, their inconsistencies and their twisted logic, disregarding the pain I cause them. Before Right Wing talk radio started to ban me I regularly gave this Administration many solutions to the problems that they created. They have half implemented some of them, botching the job all the way. Prior to the 2004 election the Democrats did the same and this Administration stole their ideas, repeated their ineptness as they proclaimed â€œKerry wouldnâ€™t do anything different than weâ€™re already doingâ€. The entire media let these buffoons get away with that and a multitude of other lies and irrelevant issues (vote for Bush because he goes to church more often than the Dems). As we define our troops as some of our best and brightest they are dying because of Bushâ€™s blunders. Meanwhile youâ€™ve got Kerry on the brain. The next time you make points try to do it in a way where they wonâ€™t reach back and bite you in theâ€¦ My apologies, I digress.
 Virtually every political speech Bush makes is broadcast or covered as news on all of the major cable news stations including MSNBC. These are political freebees that were never given to Clinton when he was President. Monica Crowley, Tucker, Scarborough, Alex Witt, Buchanan and Alison Stewart are all Right Wingers or Republican sympathizers who wear their MSNBC Conservative leanings on their sleeves. Imus claims to be a Democrat even as he trashes his purported kind while holding his nose as he endorsing them. Chris Matthews only recently (after the 2004 election) found his balls and started hitting Republicans as hard as he hit Democrats. He still hates everything Clinton related. Keith who had always leaned a little to the left decided that he would give America the ugly truth warts and all. Itâ€™s not Keithâ€™s fault that Republicans are more scandal ridden, untruthful and incompetent than Democrats are. When the truth is told Republicans see it as bias. They point to all of the negative Republican stories in the news relative to those run on Dems as proof of liberal bias. Your whining about MSNBC kind of reminds me of a mass murderer complaining about the negative press that he is receiving vs. that of his accusers. Duh! Liars need to be exposed or else they will never stop lying.

Banned but not out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To: Deagle</p>
<p> I have nothing to be ashamed of. I did not vote for George W. Bush, ever! Your own words prove my point. It is obvious that you think Clintonâ€™s lies were more harmful to this country than the Bush lies that led to three thousand Americans dying in Iraq. You actually believe this folly to be rational thought. You are probably just the kind of guy who would have laughed at Bushâ€™s vulgar joke about not finding WMDs under his desk even as our troops on his orders were dying looking for those very weapons. You are stuck on what a twenty something year old said thirty five years ago even as this mature in age President claims that he would do it all over again regarding Iraq, knowing what he knows now. Republicans that I worked with during the nineties wanted Clinton impeached during his FIRST term. The Right wanted to impeach him evermore when he attacked Ben Ladenâ€™s terrorist camps. They showed an extreme lack of insight when they accused Bill of dropping Lewinsky bombs even as the bad guys schemed against us.<br />
 The reality is that for every Clinton lie that you can come up with I can give you five Bush lies and he still has two years to go. With all due respect the shame should be all yours. You are stuck on stupid about the past of Democrats even as you are blind about the present incompetence exhibited by this Administration. It was this president who sent our brave young people off to battle without the proper armor (on a pack of lies). How many lives did that cost America? Where is your outrage? Youâ€™re stuck!<br />
 I donâ€™t whine. I educate and smack down partisan hacks, their inconsistencies and their twisted logic, disregarding the pain I cause them. Before Right Wing talk radio started to ban me I regularly gave this Administration many solutions to the problems that they created. They have half implemented some of them, botching the job all the way. Prior to the 2004 election the Democrats did the same and this Administration stole their ideas, repeated their ineptness as they proclaimed â€œKerry wouldnâ€™t do anything different than weâ€™re already doingâ€. The entire media let these buffoons get away with that and a multitude of other lies and irrelevant issues (vote for Bush because he goes to church more often than the Dems). As we define our troops as some of our best and brightest they are dying because of Bushâ€™s blunders. Meanwhile youâ€™ve got Kerry on the brain. The next time you make points try to do it in a way where they wonâ€™t reach back and bite you in theâ€¦ My apologies, I digress.<br />
 Virtually every political speech Bush makes is broadcast or covered as news on all of the major cable news stations including MSNBC. These are political freebees that were never given to Clinton when he was President. Monica Crowley, Tucker, Scarborough, Alex Witt, Buchanan and Alison Stewart are all Right Wingers or Republican sympathizers who wear their MSNBC Conservative leanings on their sleeves. Imus claims to be a Democrat even as he trashes his purported kind while holding his nose as he endorsing them. Chris Matthews only recently (after the 2004 election) found his balls and started hitting Republicans as hard as he hit Democrats. He still hates everything Clinton related. Keith who had always leaned a little to the left decided that he would give America the ugly truth warts and all. Itâ€™s not Keithâ€™s fault that Republicans are more scandal ridden, untruthful and incompetent than Democrats are. When the truth is told Republicans see it as bias. They point to all of the negative Republican stories in the news relative to those run on Dems as proof of liberal bias. Your whining about MSNBC kind of reminds me of a mass murderer complaining about the negative press that he is receiving vs. that of his accusers. Duh! Liars need to be exposed or else they will never stop lying.</p>
<p>Banned but not out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fritz</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-379747</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/#comment-379747</guid>
		<description>In 1972, as he ran for the House, he was less apologetic in his comments about the merits of a volunteer army. He declared in the questionnaire that he opposed the draft but considered a volunteer army "a greater anathema."
"I am convinced a volunteer army would be an army of the poor and the black and the brown," Kerry wrote. "We must not repeat the travesty of the inequities present during Vietnam. I also fear having a professional army that views the perpetuation of war crimes as simply 'doing its job.'

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061102/D8L4QH580.html
HT Drudge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1972, as he ran for the House, he was less apologetic in his comments about the merits of a volunteer army. He declared in the questionnaire that he opposed the draft but considered a volunteer army &#8220;a greater anathema.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I am convinced a volunteer army would be an army of the poor and the black and the brown,&#8221; Kerry wrote. &#8220;We must not repeat the travesty of the inequities present during Vietnam. I also fear having a professional army that views the perpetuation of war crimes as simply &#8216;doing its job.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061102/D8L4QH580.html" rel="nofollow">http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061102/D8L4QH580.html</a><br />
HT Drudge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fritz</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-379694</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/#comment-379694</guid>
		<description>America is lucky this leftist did not become President.  He was unable on his own to recognize how damaging his words were.  Right on cue, the sole reason the left nominated him for President, he bowed to the consensus.  Could one imagine US foreign policy vacillating to the consensus whims?  There would have been no Iraqi elections in January, appeasement to N. Korea &#38; Iran.  An Iraqi civil war would have occurred instantly with a President Kerry simply blaming Bush.  So what if Democrats win the House, stability in Iraq in 08 will put those that wanted to cut &#38; run on the wrong side of history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America is lucky this leftist did not become President.  He was unable on his own to recognize how damaging his words were.  Right on cue, the sole reason the left nominated him for President, he bowed to the consensus.  Could one imagine US foreign policy vacillating to the consensus whims?  There would have been no Iraqi elections in January, appeasement to N. Korea &amp; Iran.  An Iraqi civil war would have occurred instantly with a President Kerry simply blaming Bush.  So what if Democrats win the House, stability in Iraq in 08 will put those that wanted to cut &amp; run on the wrong side of history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drewsmom</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-379566</link>
		<dc:creator>Drewsmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/#comment-379566</guid>
		<description>That is not what I call an apology, the word misinterpreted shoud not have been used, makes us seem that we are too dumb to understand what he was really saying, making kerry sound even more elite than he thinks he is. spittin chrissy or one of the shows last night even rewrote the entire sentence he said saying this is what he was spose to have said and just didn't read it right from his notes .. how lame do these kerry defenders think we are......!!!!
This Thursday morning imus in the boring morning is playing a new song by willie nelson, its called what happened to peace on earth, one of the lyrics, we listen everyday to they're gonna attack us, what is a liars word worth?  Good God, these loons don't even think the ememy is dangerous and want to kill us ... its hopeless to convenience this moonbats, its up to us sane Americans to keep this country safe ... its clear the dems won't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not what I call an apology, the word misinterpreted shoud not have been used, makes us seem that we are too dumb to understand what he was really saying, making kerry sound even more elite than he thinks he is. spittin chrissy or one of the shows last night even rewrote the entire sentence he said saying this is what he was spose to have said and just didn&#8217;t read it right from his notes .. how lame do these kerry defenders think we are&#8230;&#8230;!!!!<br />
This Thursday morning imus in the boring morning is playing a new song by willie nelson, its called what happened to peace on earth, one of the lyrics, we listen everyday to they&#8217;re gonna attack us, what is a liars word worth?  Good God, these loons don&#8217;t even think the ememy is dangerous and want to kill us &#8230; its hopeless to convenience this moonbats, its up to us sane Americans to keep this country safe &#8230; its clear the dems won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deagle</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-379250</link>
		<dc:creator>Deagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/#comment-379250</guid>
		<description>Larry,

Your ought to be ashamed of yourself, but I doubt that you are.  Clinton was castigated because of his obvious lying.

You can believe that the War in Iraq is wrong and argue such...but, just whining about Bush and his policies without "your" suggestions are just talk (much like your Democratic leaders).

Mercy, I would love for the MSM to chime in for the Republicans...Please tell me where I can find that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry,</p>
<p>Your ought to be ashamed of yourself, but I doubt that you are.  Clinton was castigated because of his obvious lying.</p>
<p>You can believe that the War in Iraq is wrong and argue such&#8230;but, just whining about Bush and his policies without &#8220;your&#8221; suggestions are just talk (much like your Democratic leaders).</p>
<p>Mercy, I would love for the MSM to chime in for the Republicans&#8230;Please tell me where I can find that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry in los angeles</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-379235</link>
		<dc:creator>larry in los angeles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/#comment-379235</guid>
		<description>Six thousand Americans saw their demise on George Bush's watch right before our eyes and Republicans have Kerry on the brain. Iraqi clowns in command of our guys, stops the search for a lost G.I. and Republicans have Kerry on the brain. Our brave young troops are dying, Bush crisscrosses this country lying and Republicans have Kerry on the brain. Just like when Bill was President, itâ€™s the same crass resentment, only then it was a Clinton they disdained. Of course the media chimes in with Right Wing propagandic spin and the Conservatives will probably win again. 
 
Republicans always seem to know whatâ€™s important for America.

Banned but not out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Six thousand Americans saw their demise on George Bush&#8217;s watch right before our eyes and Republicans have Kerry on the brain. Iraqi clowns in command of our guys, stops the search for a lost G.I. and Republicans have Kerry on the brain. Our brave young troops are dying, Bush crisscrosses this country lying and Republicans have Kerry on the brain. Just like when Bill was President, itâ€™s the same crass resentment, only then it was a Clinton they disdained. Of course the media chimes in with Right Wing propagandic spin and the Conservatives will probably win again. </p>
<p>Republicans always seem to know whatâ€™s important for America.</p>
<p>Banned but not out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joust The Facts</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-378970</link>
		<dc:creator>Joust The Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 03:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/#comment-378970</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Victor Davis Hanson Looks At John Kerry ...&lt;/strong&gt;

... and cringes. He's got a collection of 8 thoughts pertaining to Mr. Kerry's flub, self-righteous anger, admission of flub, and ultimate denial-of-responsibility apology that are spot on. A notable one is #4:(4) This is not the first, but third,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Victor Davis Hanson Looks At John Kerry &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230; and cringes. He&#8217;s got a collection of 8 thoughts pertaining to Mr. Kerry&#8217;s flub, self-righteous anger, admission of flub, and ultimate denial-of-responsibility apology that are spot on. A notable one is #4:(4) This is not the first, but third,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deagle</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-378960</link>
		<dc:creator>Deagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 03:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/01/apology-accepted-lets-move-on/#comment-378960</guid>
		<description>Well, since your not responding, I assume that you are a bit embarrassed to use such language.  After all, thatâ€™s what I expect from a left-wing blog.  Yes, I know that you have put down Kerry in the past â€“ I was commenting on your current comments.  Do you really expect all readers to know where you stand by your past blogs?  That is unrealistic and if you refer to your previous statements (rather than the current), you will have a hard time making your points.

At no point in the current blog post did you make your previous points clear.  I knew them from prior readings, but most donâ€™t.  

This comment does not in any way give away your other comments from the past.  If I, as a reader, came here for the first time, I would not know exactly where you stand on Kerry.  Soâ€¦ again, I make my comments in good faith toward your current comments.

Sorry that it upset you, I do not like profanity (do not use it myself) and hope that you would use your literary expertise instead (which I know you have).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since your not responding, I assume that you are a bit embarrassed to use such language.  After all, thatâ€™s what I expect from a left-wing blog.  Yes, I know that you have put down Kerry in the past â€“ I was commenting on your current comments.  Do you really expect all readers to know where you stand by your past blogs?  That is unrealistic and if you refer to your previous statements (rather than the current), you will have a hard time making your points.</p>
<p>At no point in the current blog post did you make your previous points clear.  I knew them from prior readings, but most donâ€™t.  </p>
<p>This comment does not in any way give away your other comments from the past.  If I, as a reader, came here for the first time, I would not know exactly where you stand on Kerry.  Soâ€¦ again, I make my comments in good faith toward your current comments.</p>
<p>Sorry that it upset you, I do not like profanity (do not use it myself) and hope that you would use your literary expertise instead (which I know you have).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
