<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ALLEN GRACIOUSLY CONCEDES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 17:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wry Mouth</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/comment-page-1/#comment-394978</link>
		<dc:creator>Wry Mouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/#comment-394978</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Memo to Conservative Lawyers: Hold Off on Recounts, Lawsuits&lt;/strong&gt;

This is just a "stop gap" memo to all Conservative lawyers, who have no doubt fanned out across the nation to instigate a firestorm of recounts in close state races, recalls, and lawsuits regarding any "disenfranchisement" of traditionally Republic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Memo to Conservative Lawyers: Hold Off on Recounts, Lawsuits</strong></p>
<p>This is just a &#8220;stop gap&#8221; memo to all Conservative lawyers, who have no doubt fanned out across the nation to instigate a firestorm of recounts in close state races, recalls, and lawsuits regarding any &#8220;disenfranchisement&#8221; of traditionally Republic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/comment-page-1/#comment-390895</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/#comment-390895</guid>
		<description>I would like to contrast Allen's concession speech with his campaign's attempt trying to portray Jim Webb as a pedophile based on his novels, one of which is required reading for all Marine officers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to contrast Allen&#8217;s concession speech with his campaign&#8217;s attempt trying to portray Jim Webb as a pedophile based on his novels, one of which is required reading for all Marine officers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney A Stanton</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/comment-page-1/#comment-390809</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney A Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/#comment-390809</guid>
		<description>*OFF TOPIC COMMENT*

To all the men that have worn the Globe and Anchor, all the men who will so do in the future and most importantly to those giving their lives for freedom

HAPPY BIRTHDAY!

â€œâ€¦First to fight for right and freedomâ€¦â€
Gung Ho!


An old exJarhead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*OFF TOPIC COMMENT*</p>
<p>To all the men that have worn the Globe and Anchor, all the men who will so do in the future and most importantly to those giving their lives for freedom</p>
<p>HAPPY BIRTHDAY!</p>
<p>â€œâ€¦First to fight for right and freedomâ€¦â€<br />
Gung Ho!</p>
<p>An old exJarhead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/comment-page-1/#comment-390528</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/#comment-390528</guid>
		<description>i think the reason the dems were concerned about rigged elections were because most rational people knew the electorate was leaning heavily against the republicans... also, given the history of the last two presidential elections, especially the one where Gore won the majority of the votes, it is also understandable some may not trust the republicans to win fairly... lets face it, the recent republican mindset has been nastier and more unethical than any previous administration and ruling party... and that's pretty nasty! So, the reason there is no mention of rigged elections is because everyone knows they were fair, but people don't have the same trust when republicans win because their reputation succeeds them.

Finally, the only ones who have lost faith in anything are the right wing extremists, who in their manipulation and corruption and especially in their hypocracy, have swung the tide of mainstream america against them... finally the lie of the right is doing itself in, one scandal at a time... 

I hope the crimes committed by the Bush administration are exposed and the democrats don't wimp out due to pity for the pathetic man behind the curtain... but i wont be surprised if the 'liberals' (ie. mainstream america who voted against Bush) show compassion and let the poor man slip away into obscurity as the worst president ever...

Somehow i doubt the right will ever get as far as it did in the last 6 years, the damage will take decades to repair, and the issues must be addressed, else immediate negative repercussions will result... 

It's funny you end your comment speaking of American Democracy... as if it's expression and recent flexing of it's muscle was upsetting to you... I have never been prouder to be an American, and for the first time in years feel hope once again for truth and the power of the people...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the reason the dems were concerned about rigged elections were because most rational people knew the electorate was leaning heavily against the republicans&#8230; also, given the history of the last two presidential elections, especially the one where Gore won the majority of the votes, it is also understandable some may not trust the republicans to win fairly&#8230; lets face it, the recent republican mindset has been nastier and more unethical than any previous administration and ruling party&#8230; and that&#8217;s pretty nasty! So, the reason there is no mention of rigged elections is because everyone knows they were fair, but people don&#8217;t have the same trust when republicans win because their reputation succeeds them.</p>
<p>Finally, the only ones who have lost faith in anything are the right wing extremists, who in their manipulation and corruption and especially in their hypocracy, have swung the tide of mainstream america against them&#8230; finally the lie of the right is doing itself in, one scandal at a time&#8230; </p>
<p>I hope the crimes committed by the Bush administration are exposed and the democrats don&#8217;t wimp out due to pity for the pathetic man behind the curtain&#8230; but i wont be surprised if the &#8216;liberals&#8217; (ie. mainstream america who voted against Bush) show compassion and let the poor man slip away into obscurity as the worst president ever&#8230;</p>
<p>Somehow i doubt the right will ever get as far as it did in the last 6 years, the damage will take decades to repair, and the issues must be addressed, else immediate negative repercussions will result&#8230; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny you end your comment speaking of American Democracy&#8230; as if it&#8217;s expression and recent flexing of it&#8217;s muscle was upsetting to you&#8230; I have never been prouder to be an American, and for the first time in years feel hope once again for truth and the power of the people&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wickedpinto</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/comment-page-1/#comment-390263</link>
		<dc:creator>Wickedpinto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/#comment-390263</guid>
		<description>Chucky was being whiny, basicaly demanding that allen should concede when there was still a possibility that the votes could mean he might win.

Which is it chuck?  make all votes count?  or stop counting as soon as you get a lead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chucky was being whiny, basicaly demanding that allen should concede when there was still a possibility that the votes could mean he might win.</p>
<p>Which is it chuck?  make all votes count?  or stop counting as soon as you get a lead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/comment-page-1/#comment-390255</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/#comment-390255</guid>
		<description>Well, I was disappointed that Allen conceded, it means the Dems have control over Congress, which will make things exceptionally difficult for Bush. But you're right, at least he didn't drag it out like he could have, he bowed out when he knew that the people had spoken.

I wish that Liberman wouldn't caucus with the Democrats, after all they did throw him out like a wet sponge because he was pro-war, why would he want to caucus with them after that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I was disappointed that Allen conceded, it means the Dems have control over Congress, which will make things exceptionally difficult for Bush. But you&#8217;re right, at least he didn&#8217;t drag it out like he could have, he bowed out when he knew that the people had spoken.</p>
<p>I wish that Liberman wouldn&#8217;t caucus with the Democrats, after all they did throw him out like a wet sponge because he was pro-war, why would he want to caucus with them after that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Ross @ Journal</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/comment-page-1/#comment-390226</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Ross @ Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/#comment-390226</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Super-secret transcript from NSA Surveillance&lt;/strong&gt;

You can't breathe a word of this to anyone, but we've gotten our hands on another transcript from the NSA terrorist surveillance program. Shhhhhh... let's listen in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Super-secret transcript from NSA Surveillance</strong></p>
<p>You can&#8217;t breathe a word of this to anyone, but we&#8217;ve gotten our hands on another transcript from the NSA terrorist surveillance program. Shhhhhh&#8230; let&#8217;s listen in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alear</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/comment-page-1/#comment-390177</link>
		<dc:creator>Alear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/#comment-390177</guid>
		<description>Rick,
It's already being batted about that the other Senator from Virginia, John Warren, is turning 80 and may not run in 2008. Leaving the field open for Allen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,<br />
It&#8217;s already being batted about that the other Senator from Virginia, John Warren, is turning 80 and may not run in 2008. Leaving the field open for Allen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/comment-page-1/#comment-390020</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 21:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/09/allen-graciously-concedes/#comment-390020</guid>
		<description>Bipartisanship and cooperation is important to our future. Senator Allen was gracious indeed. There are a thousand reasons Democrats are prickly about Republican operations. Do you remember Lee Atwater, Donald Segretti, Karl Rove and their ilk's political hardball?

Here is some material from a Lee Atwater interview in Alexander Lamis's book, "Two-Party South", discussing the Republican Southern strategy circa the Reagan era:

Atwater: As to the whole Southern strategy that Harry Dent and others put together in 1968, opposition to the Voting Rights Act would have been a central part of keeping the South. Now [the new Southern Strategy of Ronald Reagan] doesnâ€™t have to do that. All you have to do to keep the South is for Reagan to run in place on the issues heâ€™s campaigned on since 1964â€¦ and thatâ€™s fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole clusterâ€¦ 
Questioner: But the fact is, isnâ€™t it, that Reagan does get to the Wallace voter and to the racist side of the Wallace voter by doing away with legal services, by cutting down on food stampsâ€¦? 
Atwater: You start out in 1954 by saying, 'Nigger, nigger, nigger.' By 1968 you can't say 'nigger' - that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. 
And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me - because obviously sitting around saying, 'We want to cut this,' is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than 'Nigger, nigger.' 

Multiply this dirtiness a thousand fold in Republican political behavior since then and you too will be suspicious and angry. I hope in your new born-again conservatism, you will have the honesty to admit that politics is a dirty game and Republicans are just as dirty as Democrats have ever been. Surely the macaca's will appreciate Allen's grace under fire and how much better he is than any Democrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bipartisanship and cooperation is important to our future. Senator Allen was gracious indeed. There are a thousand reasons Democrats are prickly about Republican operations. Do you remember Lee Atwater, Donald Segretti, Karl Rove and their ilk&#8217;s political hardball?</p>
<p>Here is some material from a Lee Atwater interview in Alexander Lamis&#8217;s book, &#8220;Two-Party South&#8221;, discussing the Republican Southern strategy circa the Reagan era:</p>
<p>Atwater: As to the whole Southern strategy that Harry Dent and others put together in 1968, opposition to the Voting Rights Act would have been a central part of keeping the South. Now [the new Southern Strategy of Ronald Reagan] doesnâ€™t have to do that. All you have to do to keep the South is for Reagan to run in place on the issues heâ€™s campaigned on since 1964â€¦ and thatâ€™s fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole clusterâ€¦<br />
Questioner: But the fact is, isnâ€™t it, that Reagan does get to the Wallace voter and to the racist side of the Wallace voter by doing away with legal services, by cutting down on food stampsâ€¦?<br />
Atwater: You start out in 1954 by saying, &#8216;Nigger, nigger, nigger.&#8217; By 1968 you can&#8217;t say &#8216;nigger&#8217; - that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states&#8217; rights and all that stuff. You&#8217;re getting so abstract now [that] you&#8217;re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you&#8217;re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.<br />
And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I&#8217;m not saying that. But I&#8217;m saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me - because obviously sitting around saying, &#8216;We want to cut this,&#8217; is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than &#8216;Nigger, nigger.&#8217; </p>
<p>Multiply this dirtiness a thousand fold in Republican political behavior since then and you too will be suspicious and angry. I hope in your new born-again conservatism, you will have the honesty to admit that politics is a dirty game and Republicans are just as dirty as Democrats have ever been. Surely the macaca&#8217;s will appreciate Allen&#8217;s grace under fire and how much better he is than any Democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
