<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A STRAW IN THE WIND?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/10/a-straw-in-the-wind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/10/a-straw-in-the-wind/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: beornn52</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/10/a-straw-in-the-wind/comment-page-1/#comment-396580</link>
		<dc:creator>beornn52</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/10/a-straw-in-the-wind/#comment-396580</guid>
		<description>I saw McCain a little while back saying how he was in favor of same sex marriages so long as they were just religious ceremonies and not legal marriages. If he keeps talking like that he will lose the respect of the Independents and Democrats who might support him. I suspect a lot of people in favor of same sex marriage and civil unions would rather support someone they otherwise like even if he was against same sex unions over someone who tried to have it both ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw McCain a little while back saying how he was in favor of same sex marriages so long as they were just religious ceremonies and not legal marriages. If he keeps talking like that he will lose the respect of the Independents and Democrats who might support him. I suspect a lot of people in favor of same sex marriage and civil unions would rather support someone they otherwise like even if he was against same sex unions over someone who tried to have it both ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/10/a-straw-in-the-wind/comment-page-1/#comment-395810</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 04:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/10/a-straw-in-the-wind/#comment-395810</guid>
		<description>Republicans will vote for pragmatism in 2008.  They've only got two years, and they'll gladly put off the intra-movement struggle you're talking about on this blog in order to ensure that Hillary and Pelosi don't get to socialize society together.

The names that keep coming up post-election are McCain, Rudy, and Romney.  Newt's maybe a distant fourth, though he looked better before the election than he does now, as everyone now remembers how Newt seems unelectable, and electability is paramount.

Romney is coming up a lot because a) he's the only all-around conservative left in the field and b) he's just now being noticed by many observers.  Those of us who have been watching him for awhile have to question his potency post-election.  Again, if there were still a GOP Congress to check President Hillary, he might be a worthwhile risk, especially if the alternative is McCain.  But he's still very green, and he's only won one statewide race, and it's hard to see Republicans taking such a great risk by nominating him.

I think it's basically down to Rudy or McCain.  Rudy has the edge right now, because Republicans love him, and McCain they can't stand.  McCain's only shot against Giuliani is to make the race about Rudy's past positions and personal life, and even then he has to assume that such a smear campaign won't backfire.  I think Rudy will be the nominee, though I'd have to say McCain's moved into second place, while before the election I probably would've put Mitt in second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans will vote for pragmatism in 2008.  They&#8217;ve only got two years, and they&#8217;ll gladly put off the intra-movement struggle you&#8217;re talking about on this blog in order to ensure that Hillary and Pelosi don&#8217;t get to socialize society together.</p>
<p>The names that keep coming up post-election are McCain, Rudy, and Romney.  Newt&#8217;s maybe a distant fourth, though he looked better before the election than he does now, as everyone now remembers how Newt seems unelectable, and electability is paramount.</p>
<p>Romney is coming up a lot because a) he&#8217;s the only all-around conservative left in the field and b) he&#8217;s just now being noticed by many observers.  Those of us who have been watching him for awhile have to question his potency post-election.  Again, if there were still a GOP Congress to check President Hillary, he might be a worthwhile risk, especially if the alternative is McCain.  But he&#8217;s still very green, and he&#8217;s only won one statewide race, and it&#8217;s hard to see Republicans taking such a great risk by nominating him.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s basically down to Rudy or McCain.  Rudy has the edge right now, because Republicans love him, and McCain they can&#8217;t stand.  McCain&#8217;s only shot against Giuliani is to make the race about Rudy&#8217;s past positions and personal life, and even then he has to assume that such a smear campaign won&#8217;t backfire.  I think Rudy will be the nominee, though I&#8217;d have to say McCain&#8217;s moved into second place, while before the election I probably would&#8217;ve put Mitt in second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/10/a-straw-in-the-wind/comment-page-1/#comment-391179</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/10/a-straw-in-the-wind/#comment-391179</guid>
		<description>As a Democrat, it's going to be fascinating to see how the Republicans choose their nominee.

Can Romney win in a party dominated by evangelical Christians?  

Can Giuliani the Drag Queen win in a party built on the pillars of anti-abortion and anti-gay marriage policy?

Will the entire conservative blogosphere have their heads explode if McCain wins the nomination?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Democrat, it&#8217;s going to be fascinating to see how the Republicans choose their nominee.</p>
<p>Can Romney win in a party dominated by evangelical Christians?  </p>
<p>Can Giuliani the Drag Queen win in a party built on the pillars of anti-abortion and anti-gay marriage policy?</p>
<p>Will the entire conservative blogosphere have their heads explode if McCain wins the nomination?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: longz</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/10/a-straw-in-the-wind/comment-page-1/#comment-391139</link>
		<dc:creator>longz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/10/a-straw-in-the-wind/#comment-391139</guid>
		<description>Because of this last election, I'd bet a pile of gold that the next president will be a Republican.  Come 2008, voters will be well aware that combining the White House with solid Democratic majorities in Congress would court as great a disaster as the one we went through.  

For that reason, I'd put my money on a Republican candidate who is willing to work with a Democratic Congress, instead of declaring total war on it.  

I'd put my money on Hagel or Bloomberg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of this last election, I&#8217;d bet a pile of gold that the next president will be a Republican.  Come 2008, voters will be well aware that combining the White House with solid Democratic majorities in Congress would court as great a disaster as the one we went through.  </p>
<p>For that reason, I&#8217;d put my money on a Republican candidate who is willing to work with a Democratic Congress, instead of declaring total war on it.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d put my money on Hagel or Bloomberg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter E. Wallis</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/10/a-straw-in-the-wind/comment-page-1/#comment-391105</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter E. Wallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/11/10/a-straw-in-the-wind/#comment-391105</guid>
		<description>Bolton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bolton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
