<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 01:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/comment-page-2/#comment-465008</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/#comment-465008</guid>
		<description>T.Gray,

Of course the Congress has adjourned after passing the concurrent resolution to end the session.

Again, if you want to play a game of "gotcha" based on trivial technicalities, then please get your facts straight. The 109th Congress was to end on or before January 3, 2007.

Chip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T.Gray,</p>
<p>Of course the Congress has adjourned after passing the concurrent resolution to end the session.</p>
<p>Again, if you want to play a game of &#8220;gotcha&#8221; based on trivial technicalities, then please get your facts straight. The 109th Congress was to end on or before January 3, 2007.</p>
<p>Chip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Gray</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/comment-page-2/#comment-464974</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/#comment-464974</guid>
		<description>Look, all this froufra over not much, the end of which is that Rick for all his willingness to impugn the character of Mr. Reid for pragmatically choosing a visit with three pretty important South American leaders, one of whom is sitting on impressive oil reserves, over attending the state funeral of an ex-president, also recognizes that he has to acknowledge the current president's lack of character for blowing off the same state funeral so he wouldn't have to cut short one of his many vacations.

Good for you, Rick.  May you continue to see more and more clearly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, all this froufra over not much, the end of which is that Rick for all his willingness to impugn the character of Mr. Reid for pragmatically choosing a visit with three pretty important South American leaders, one of whom is sitting on impressive oil reserves, over attending the state funeral of an ex-president, also recognizes that he has to acknowledge the current president&#8217;s lack of character for blowing off the same state funeral so he wouldn&#8217;t have to cut short one of his many vacations.</p>
<p>Good for you, Rick.  May you continue to see more and more clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Gray</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/comment-page-2/#comment-464952</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/#comment-464952</guid>
		<description>Chip,

The 109 Congress didn't "end" on December 9, 2006.  It ajourned.  It still held authority as a Congress till the end of its reign that is December 31, 2006.  Sorry, nice try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chip,</p>
<p>The 109 Congress didn&#8217;t &#8220;end&#8221; on December 9, 2006.  It ajourned.  It still held authority as a Congress till the end of its reign that is December 31, 2006.  Sorry, nice try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/comment-page-2/#comment-464462</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 07:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/#comment-464462</guid>
		<description>Jonathan (#90),

&lt;blockquote&gt;On another note, itâ€™s interesting that no one on the right has addressed the point the Mr Reid is not Majority Leader until 1 January 2007. I would be interested in any comments from the right leaning posters on this site regarding this fact.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The 109th Congress ended on December 9, 2006. Mr. Frist has retired and returned to Tennessee, therefore the honor and duty would fall to the incoming Senate Majority Leader, Mr. Reid.

Those who are so eager to nail Rick on a trite technicality ought take note that Mr. Reid won't have a Senate to be Majority Leader of until January 4, 2007.

Chip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan (#90),</p>
<blockquote><p>On another note, itâ€™s interesting that no one on the right has addressed the point the Mr Reid is not Majority Leader until 1 January 2007. I would be interested in any comments from the right leaning posters on this site regarding this fact.</p></blockquote>
<p>The 109th Congress ended on December 9, 2006. Mr. Frist has retired and returned to Tennessee, therefore the honor and duty would fall to the incoming Senate Majority Leader, Mr. Reid.</p>
<p>Those who are so eager to nail Rick on a trite technicality ought take note that Mr. Reid won&#8217;t have a Senate to be Majority Leader of until January 4, 2007.</p>
<p>Chip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omoo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/comment-page-2/#comment-464398</link>
		<dc:creator>omoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 05:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/#comment-464398</guid>
		<description>"Less anyone think my displeasure is reserved exclusively for the Democratic LEADERSHIP..."
Yes it is.
"Lest"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Less anyone think my displeasure is reserved exclusively for the Democratic LEADERSHIP&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Yes it is.<br />
&#8220;Lest&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/comment-page-2/#comment-463936</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/#comment-463936</guid>
		<description>"anything I said about Reid above goes double for Bush."

Kudos sir for being evenhanded, something which doesn't happen very often on either the left or the right.

This is my first visit to your website and I think that I shall be back.

On another note, it's interesting that no one on the right has addressed the point the Mr Reid is not Majority Leader until 1 January 2007. I would be interested in any comments from the right leaning posters on this site regarding this fact.

Have a happy and safe New Years everyone!

Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;anything I said about Reid above goes double for Bush.&#8221;</p>
<p>Kudos sir for being evenhanded, something which doesn&#8217;t happen very often on either the left or the right.</p>
<p>This is my first visit to your website and I think that I shall be back.</p>
<p>On another note, it&#8217;s interesting that no one on the right has addressed the point the Mr Reid is not Majority Leader until 1 January 2007. I would be interested in any comments from the right leaning posters on this site regarding this fact.</p>
<p>Have a happy and safe New Years everyone!</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberaltarian</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/comment-page-2/#comment-463854</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberaltarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/#comment-463854</guid>
		<description>"what gives it the power to unite our people â€“ so diverse, so different â€“ are its myths and legends; in other words, the symbolic over the substantative"

Thank you so much for hitting the nail on the head. Here's some myths and legends: WMDs, Saddam in cahoots with Al Qaeda, the Constitution is just a piece of paper, global warming is a left-wing fantasy, and Bush's policies are based on science. 

Now insult me. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;what gives it the power to unite our people â€“ so diverse, so different â€“ are its myths and legends; in other words, the symbolic over the substantative&#8221;</p>
<p>Thank you so much for hitting the nail on the head. Here&#8217;s some myths and legends: WMDs, Saddam in cahoots with Al Qaeda, the Constitution is just a piece of paper, global warming is a left-wing fantasy, and Bush&#8217;s policies are based on science. </p>
<p>Now insult me. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3reddogs</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/comment-page-2/#comment-463741</link>
		<dc:creator>3reddogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/#comment-463741</guid>
		<description>"Not one commenter has addressed the thesis of my post; that Reidâ€™s junketing and missing a former Presidentâ€™s funeral is violating both good manners and tradition."

Well, before Gerald Ford it was "traditional" to wait until AFTER someone is convicted of a crime before granting him a pardon.  Party loyalty: 1 -- Tradition: 0.  And Gerald Ford our "least partisan" president???  Ford actually boasted that he set a record for the number of bills he vetoed (66).  On a brighter note, I'm sure Bush will do his damnedest to break that record in the next 2 years, thereby giving new meaning to the word "bipartisan" (and convincing voters that the only way to get this country back on track is to put a Democrat in the White House).   

Oh, and where I come from, meeting with the presidents of 3 South American countries hardly qualifies as "junketing".  Now Tom DeLay's golf trips at taxpayer expense ... that's what I call junketing.

Gerald Ford spent all of 2-1/2 years as president and he wasn't even elected to the office, he deprived this country of the right to know exactly how corrupt the Nixon administration was, and he didn't even have the courage to let Woodward publish his disapproval of Bush until after he was dead.  Harry Reid might be guilty of "bad manners" but maybe he decided that was better than being guilty of hyprocrisy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Not one commenter has addressed the thesis of my post; that Reidâ€™s junketing and missing a former Presidentâ€™s funeral is violating both good manners and tradition.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, before Gerald Ford it was &#8220;traditional&#8221; to wait until AFTER someone is convicted of a crime before granting him a pardon.  Party loyalty: 1 &#8212; Tradition: 0.  And Gerald Ford our &#8220;least partisan&#8221; president???  Ford actually boasted that he set a record for the number of bills he vetoed (66).  On a brighter note, I&#8217;m sure Bush will do his damnedest to break that record in the next 2 years, thereby giving new meaning to the word &#8220;bipartisan&#8221; (and convincing voters that the only way to get this country back on track is to put a Democrat in the White House).   </p>
<p>Oh, and where I come from, meeting with the presidents of 3 South American countries hardly qualifies as &#8220;junketing&#8221;.  Now Tom DeLay&#8217;s golf trips at taxpayer expense &#8230; that&#8217;s what I call junketing.</p>
<p>Gerald Ford spent all of 2-1/2 years as president and he wasn&#8217;t even elected to the office, he deprived this country of the right to know exactly how corrupt the Nixon administration was, and he didn&#8217;t even have the courage to let Woodward publish his disapproval of Bush until after he was dead.  Harry Reid might be guilty of &#8220;bad manners&#8221; but maybe he decided that was better than being guilty of hyprocrisy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Progressive</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/comment-page-2/#comment-463673</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Progressive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/#comment-463673</guid>
		<description>Bush blew off Ford's STATE funeral as well. He is too busy clearing brush in Crawford. He blew off Reagan's as well, but at least he had the excuse of a G8 meeting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush blew off Ford&#8217;s STATE funeral as well. He is too busy clearing brush in Crawford. He blew off Reagan&#8217;s as well, but at least he had the excuse of a G8 meeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omoo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/comment-page-2/#comment-463270</link>
		<dc:creator>omoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 06:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/12/28/the-trouble-with-harry/#comment-463270</guid>
		<description>"lest"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;lest&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
