Comments on: IRANIAN NUKE PROGRAM STALLED?

By: Freedom Fighter

Freedom Fighter — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:15:06 +0000

Hmmm..in view of the problems you’re having with Jonathan, I hesitate…but here’s the info on Iran’s mirror site. And it comes from the same Iranian dissidents who busted Iran’s nuke program in the first place:J O S H U A P U N D I T: The nuclear project Ahmadinejad didn’t brag about. I wrote about this almost a year ago.

In any event, the threat we face from Iran is conventional in nature at this point. And it can be dealt with without having to invade and occupy the country.I won’t spam the board with another link, but look on my site if you like under `Operation Mullah Stomp.’

Let’s not let the Bush Administration stupidity in post war Iraq or his silly attitudes about `Arab democracy’ blind us to the fact that we’re in a war, and we had better win.

By: The Glittering Eye » Blog Archive » Eye on the Watcher’s Council

The Glittering Eye » Blog Archive » Eye on the Watcher’s Council — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:27:39 +0000

[...] Right Wing Nut House, â€œIranian Nuke Program Stalled?â€ [...]

By: Watcher of Weasels

Watcher of Weasels — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 06:58:37 +0000

Submitted for Your Approval

First off… any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here, and here. Die spambots, die! And now… here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher’s Council for this week’s vote. Council li…

By: Maggie's Farm

Maggie's Farm — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:58:15 +0000

Mon. Links

Lee solves the chickenhawk problem.Teflon Don can write. Walking on HistoryRick Moran on 24. RWNHCheney has a pair, says Kim. And Rightly SoCarter supports terror. Who cares? (h/t, Powerline)LaShawn on education:I strongly advocate Christian parents takin

By: Neo

Neo — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 04:43:13 +0000

Tehranâ€™s reluctance to crank up activities at its declared enrichment site at Natanz

Perhaps it is as simple as they moved the whole thing to a new site, believing there might be a US attack at Natanz.

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:30:35 +0000

Darrell: Is that you?

You said:

Shawn, people like you have been calling us morons for years. But we shut you up because Presdient Bush won twice.

You know where you can put your hate.

Mr Moran, in reply to me, wrote above:

and fantasies that only a leftist twit believes

Is a “leftist twit” more stupid or smarter than a “moron”.

By: Molon Labe

Molon Labe — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:34:05 +0000

Bill Arnold is wise to point out the likelihood that we have, directly or indirectly (i.e. in direct covert operations or by aiding Kurds or Arabs working in Iran) sought to slow down or disrupt the rush to nuclear weapons in Iran.

Bush takes a lot of heat for the state of things in Iraq. What seldom gets examined (of necessity, due to the nature of such operations) is the greatly-expanded deployment of special forces aince 9/11, much of it fostered and supported by the much-maligned Donald Rumsfeld. Iran and Iraq are pressing issues now, but Africa and Latin America (for instance) have the potential to be huge problems in the mid-term. Effective leadership looks at those issues too and on that measure this administration has done a lot of things right.

By: Darryl Smith

Darryl Smith — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:15:17 +0000

Shawn, people like you have been calling us morons for years. But we shut you up because Presdient Bush won twice.

You know where you can put your hate.

By: Shawn

Shawn — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 01:15:43 +0000

…head…exploding…from too much moronic sarcasm from Smith….

By: John Perryman

John Perryman — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:46:09 +0000

Andy - I really don’t think that anyone wants to leave our nation vulnerable to nuclear attack from any of our enemies, Iran included. But the underlying theme that I see in your message here is that we have an administration that not only recognizes those dangers, but is actually doing something about them.

Given the Bush administration’s horrendous track record in Iraq, do you really believe that this is the proper leadership for such an enterprise?