<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CHAMPS!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/01/22/champs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/01/22/champs/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 09:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: golfer1</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/01/22/champs/comment-page-1/#comment-487296</link>
		<dc:creator>golfer1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/01/22/champs/#comment-487296</guid>
		<description>The "experts" also predicted the Colts would not win any of their three playoff games.  This should be an interesting Super Bowl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;experts&#8221; also predicted the Colts would not win any of their three playoff games.  This should be an interesting Super Bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wickedpinto</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/01/22/champs/comment-page-1/#comment-486947</link>
		<dc:creator>Wickedpinto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/01/22/champs/#comment-486947</guid>
		<description>The colts are pretty interesting.  Peyton IS as good as he is billed, he just has to deserve it.  I don't think this win over NE was enough, it was too weak a performance in general.  Sure there were special teams considerations and field positioning, but still Peyton was able to butch up in the second half.

I still don't trust grossman, he's good, can be extremely good (if he doesn't get injured, and full of himself) but he didn't really prove anything.  He had some very good drives, but he wouldn't have had so many drives if it wasn't for all of the 3 and outs, and the turnovers, that this time, he didn't participate in.

Grossman has moments of being a real QB, but too often he bets on himself, when the best bet is sometimes just against the house.

As for manning, one of the things that I don't like about manning, his fake audibles, and, I never played football but I was a member of some very physical and painful entertainments as a kid and younger man.  I see peyton putting his offensive yard grabbers into VERY punishing positions during the game, and with his fickle delivery, I would be kinda pissed if it wasn't for the fact that my stats rocked because my QB really is that good, and can buy me a spot in the HoF.  Other than that, I think this would be an interesting SB.

Bears ground and pound, with a random pass cover defense.

And the colts, who use the air.  Big points I bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The colts are pretty interesting.  Peyton IS as good as he is billed, he just has to deserve it.  I don&#8217;t think this win over NE was enough, it was too weak a performance in general.  Sure there were special teams considerations and field positioning, but still Peyton was able to butch up in the second half.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t trust grossman, he&#8217;s good, can be extremely good (if he doesn&#8217;t get injured, and full of himself) but he didn&#8217;t really prove anything.  He had some very good drives, but he wouldn&#8217;t have had so many drives if it wasn&#8217;t for all of the 3 and outs, and the turnovers, that this time, he didn&#8217;t participate in.</p>
<p>Grossman has moments of being a real QB, but too often he bets on himself, when the best bet is sometimes just against the house.</p>
<p>As for manning, one of the things that I don&#8217;t like about manning, his fake audibles, and, I never played football but I was a member of some very physical and painful entertainments as a kid and younger man.  I see peyton putting his offensive yard grabbers into VERY punishing positions during the game, and with his fickle delivery, I would be kinda pissed if it wasn&#8217;t for the fact that my stats rocked because my QB really is that good, and can buy me a spot in the HoF.  Other than that, I think this would be an interesting SB.</p>
<p>Bears ground and pound, with a random pass cover defense.</p>
<p>And the colts, who use the air.  Big points I bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/01/22/champs/comment-page-1/#comment-486787</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/01/22/champs/#comment-486787</guid>
		<description>"Ok Rick, the Bears are now the least interesting opponent in the superbowl since the Atlanta Falcons faced off against John Elwayâ€™s Denver Broncos. Lets all jump for joy."

Err the Bears are much more interesting than the Colts (I guess someone doesn't know football).

Da Bears better win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ok Rick, the Bears are now the least interesting opponent in the superbowl since the Atlanta Falcons faced off against John Elwayâ€™s Denver Broncos. Lets all jump for joy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Err the Bears are much more interesting than the Colts (I guess someone doesn&#8217;t know football).</p>
<p>Da Bears better win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyR</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/01/22/champs/comment-page-1/#comment-486711</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/01/22/champs/#comment-486711</guid>
		<description>Ok Rick, the Bears are now the least interesting opponent in the superbowl since the Atlanta Falcons faced off against John Elway's Denver Broncos. Lets all jump for joy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok Rick, the Bears are now the least interesting opponent in the superbowl since the Atlanta Falcons faced off against John Elway&#8217;s Denver Broncos. Lets all jump for joy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHAMPS! at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/01/22/champs/comment-page-1/#comment-486695</link>
		<dc:creator>CHAMPS! at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/01/22/champs/#comment-486695</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Rick Moran and software by Elliott Back [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Rick Moran and software by Elliott Back [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
