Comments on: ANTI-WAR PROTEST: WHERE IS EVERYONE?

By: Andrew Yu-Jen Wang

Andrew Yu-Jen Wang — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:10:55 +0000

George W. Bush’s sentence-by-sentence speaking skills are deteriorating. Apparently, this may be due to a mental illness called “presenile dementia.” Bush may or may not be secretly still drinking heavily. Bush lied, and thousands of people died. Bush suffers from narcissism and megalomania. Moreover, Bush has been arrested three times. Bush was arrested for disorderly conduct. Bush was arrested for stealing. Bush was also arrested for a serious crime—driving under the influence of alcohol. There are reasons to believe that Bush suffers from a learning disability. Bush’s learning disability would explain a lot of things. All in all, Bush is a severely mentally ill individual. Bush is not fit to be the president of the United States.

Anti-war protesters are great.

Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA

By: Chip

Chip — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:18:47 +0000

After the pathetic showing in 11, count ‘em, 11 cities across our fair land on October 27th, reflecting declining attendance in each successive attempt by the CKIC (Cowardly Keyboard Insurrectionists Club) to bring the “will of the people” to bear upon our government, it’s fair to wonder if some sort of Weathermen redux is on the near horizon. If what is being spewed in parts of the “progressive” blogosphere is any indication, there are at least a few people imbalanced, unhinged and psychotic enough to take such a step into total depravity.

By: Brooklyn Anthony

Brooklyn Anthony — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:57:17 +0000

Just one thing to those who believe corruption was the number one issue to voters in 2006 and Iraq was 4th…. IRAQ IS A HUGE CORRUPTION ISSUE SIR!
Corruption got us in, corruption screwed it up, and corruption keeps us in.
Peace!

By: Wisconsin

Wisconsin — Tue, 06 Mar 2007 02:21:40 +0000

This is a great web site. I have some great web pages myself if you are interested to share. But I should not go on about my site too much, that is not fair, right?

By: Chip

Chip — Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:17:10 +0000

Despite Madam Speaker’s assurances the option is off the table, frenzied moonbats are still pounding away on the impeachment drum. Although predictably void of logic and reason, here’s one example displaying a better grasp of vocabulary and grammar than your typical netnut.

http://edschultz.invisionzone.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=24760&view=findpost&p=387088

Chip

By: Chip

Chip — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:54:29 +0000

Hast,

Your simplistic strawman arguments carry even less weight when viewed in light of the practical realities of law enforcement.

In every instance you’ve cited there was willful mayhem taking place which precipitated peaceful participants or innocent bystanders getting swept up by authorities in the resulting confusion of the moment.

When crowds get unruly, the unpredictable can and will happen. People can get arrested, or even killed by mistake, as was the situation at Kent State back in May of 1970.

I stand by my statement that law enforcement is not going out of their way to arrest peaceful, respectful protesters.

Chip

By: hast

hast — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:30:11 +0000

hey chip: Police were unlawfully arresting protesters well before the post-9/11 mentality set in, as it has been ruled that Seattle is liable for unlawful arrests of WTO protesters . . .

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=18077

The post-9/11 political mentality certainly would likely argue in favor of such measures, no? Lock em up first, sort em out later.

By: osopestoso

osopestoso — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 06:22:52 +0000

So, an anti-globalist is a pro-feminist, anti-capitalist, pro-abortion anti-war fruitcake? I think not. I don’t want to see socialist world hegemony any more than I want to see corporate hegemony.
Are you approving of bush’s SPP? Do you really think a NAU would be a good thing? Should we give up soverignity in order to become more like the socialist cesspool of Canada and the third world pit of Mexico?
I don’t want that any more than I want a UN loving, touchy-feely, diverse, “tolerant”, politically correct, globally cool, endorsed by Hollywood idiots dictatorship.

By: Ken McCracken

Ken McCracken — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:57:44 +0000

I am not one to pick on spelling or grammar errors (but for the grace of God go I) but that one was, indeed, too precious to pass up.

Rick, you called the chickendoves ‘rank cowards’, but I prefer the term ‘poseur’. A coward is one who realizes the gravity of a situation and cowers in the face of it. A poseur is one who does not even believe in what they are advocating. The anti-war types who are allowed to march, organize and blog must be intelegent enough to see that there is in fact no fascist state in the U.S.

How many mass demonstrations took place against the Third Reich, after all?

By: Rick Moran

Rick Moran — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:29:27 +0000

SA:

“Hypocritically arrogant?”

Don’t think so. Suggest you try a thesarus. Or maybe remedial reading.

Ken:

How’d I miss that? Someone so intelligent unable to spell “intelegent?”

Too precious…too precious.