<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACTING BARBAROUSLY TO DEFEAT THE BARBARIANS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: American</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/comment-page-1/#comment-611030</link>
		<dc:creator>American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 04:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/#comment-611030</guid>
		<description>Let them get into full production knock out thier heavy water supply and the thier cooling tower. This is critical to the process. Without cooling there will be a major meltdown like Chernobyl in the 80's. This will probably get us more death to America rally's and terrorist attacks but, It would force a relocation of the entire city of Tehran. They will have 10,000 years to think on building a new one. The Iranian people would lose all faith in the present goverment due to its inability to defend thier own skies. All the effort and military test that put their faith in the leaders to defend againts the west will be quetioned...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let them get into full production knock out thier heavy water supply and the thier cooling tower. This is critical to the process. Without cooling there will be a major meltdown like Chernobyl in the 80&#8217;s. This will probably get us more death to America rally&#8217;s and terrorist attacks but, It would force a relocation of the entire city of Tehran. They will have 10,000 years to think on building a new one. The Iranian people would lose all faith in the present goverment due to its inability to defend thier own skies. All the effort and military test that put their faith in the leaders to defend againts the west will be quetioned&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Zen</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/comment-page-1/#comment-525949</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/#comment-525949</guid>
		<description>The point that escapes Instahack and you too is that you *are* the barbarians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point that escapes Instahack and you too is that you *are* the barbarians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willis</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/comment-page-1/#comment-521197</link>
		<dc:creator>Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/#comment-521197</guid>
		<description>"We kill one of theirs, donâ€™t you think theyâ€™d do their damndest to kill one of ours?"

Like, for example, hijacking airliners and aiming them at the pentagon and White House, suicide bombing our ships, blowing up airplanes, blowing up our embassies?  You're right.  By all means, lets not provoke them into doing their damndest to kill one of ours!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We kill one of theirs, donâ€™t you think theyâ€™d do their damndest to kill one of ours?&#8221;</p>
<p>Like, for example, hijacking airliners and aiming them at the pentagon and White House, suicide bombing our ships, blowing up airplanes, blowing up our embassies?  You&#8217;re right.  By all means, lets not provoke them into doing their damndest to kill one of ours!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/comment-page-1/#comment-520761</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/#comment-520761</guid>
		<description>It would not be as difficult as you say to wreak some havoc in Iran via clandestine methods.

1. Lack of Farsi speaking assasin problem?  Ahem....how about MEK - while we disarmed, I hope we collected some cell phone numbers or e-mail addies. Who do you think blew up the Quds bus last week? Plus we have access to Afghanistan...they speak something close to Farsi there.

2. Assasinate a few scientists and no matter how much security you put on them, they'll be under pressure. The other guy was right - Israel does this successfully. They should be the model.

3. Multiple targets...hit the gas infrastructure first, then the scientists and finally the mullahs. You're looking to throw some sand in their gears not to blow up their  entire country.  Note to CIA idiots...use third party weapons...hey about using Austrian sniper rifles...that would be ironic,no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would not be as difficult as you say to wreak some havoc in Iran via clandestine methods.</p>
<p>1. Lack of Farsi speaking assasin problem?  Ahem&#8230;.how about MEK - while we disarmed, I hope we collected some cell phone numbers or e-mail addies. Who do you think blew up the Quds bus last week? Plus we have access to Afghanistan&#8230;they speak something close to Farsi there.</p>
<p>2. Assasinate a few scientists and no matter how much security you put on them, they&#8217;ll be under pressure. The other guy was right - Israel does this successfully. They should be the model.</p>
<p>3. Multiple targets&#8230;hit the gas infrastructure first, then the scientists and finally the mullahs. You&#8217;re looking to throw some sand in their gears not to blow up their  entire country.  Note to CIA idiots&#8230;use third party weapons&#8230;hey about using Austrian sniper rifles&#8230;that would be ironic,no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrick</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/comment-page-1/#comment-520740</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/#comment-520740</guid>
		<description>I don't think attacking loud-mouthed Mullahs well help much, except reduce the hot air production in Iran.  I would suggest that bunker-busting bombs targeted at a nuclear weapon development facilities might be very effective in reducing Iraq's nuclear capability, referring to both intellectual capacity as well as materiel, while avoiding the onerous title of "assassination".

Naturally such bombs should be delivered at a time when there is a high expectancy of maximum occupancy by Iran's intellectual capability.  Such a bomb would in no way be viewed an assassination since it targets no one person, but rather a projection of US military power to eliminate a veiled threat from an enemy.  Two or three such bombs in a six week interval, and you're talking about destroying Iran's capacity to engage in bomb development materially, in manpower, as well as in the morale of the remaining scientists and technicians initially engaged in that activity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think attacking loud-mouthed Mullahs well help much, except reduce the hot air production in Iran.  I would suggest that bunker-busting bombs targeted at a nuclear weapon development facilities might be very effective in reducing Iraq&#8217;s nuclear capability, referring to both intellectual capacity as well as materiel, while avoiding the onerous title of &#8220;assassination&#8221;.</p>
<p>Naturally such bombs should be delivered at a time when there is a high expectancy of maximum occupancy by Iran&#8217;s intellectual capability.  Such a bomb would in no way be viewed an assassination since it targets no one person, but rather a projection of US military power to eliminate a veiled threat from an enemy.  Two or three such bombs in a six week interval, and you&#8217;re talking about destroying Iran&#8217;s capacity to engage in bomb development materially, in manpower, as well as in the morale of the remaining scientists and technicians initially engaged in that activity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObiJohn</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/comment-page-1/#comment-520558</link>
		<dc:creator>ObiJohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/#comment-520558</guid>
		<description>"Well yes. But how many atomic bombs have we dropped since then?"

That is EXACTLY the point. How many Bombs have we needed to?

The Japanese were as fanatical in their day as the jihadists are today, and they were even more brutal. They had beheading of captured Americans down to an art, and because of their brutality towards captured Marines on the battlefield the war in the Pacific was no-holds-barred. 

How did we beat the fanatical Japanese, who were using suicide bombers before it was cool? We killed enough of them to make the rest realize that they couldn't win.

We haven't killed enough of the jihadists yet. Unfortunately, we need to kill more. Bush was right to move into Iraq, to try to "drain the swamp", but Iran is really the alligator nest over there, the pus-filled boil on the Earth's posterior, and until it's lanced and drained Iran will be a PITA that, like an infection, threatens us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Well yes. But how many atomic bombs have we dropped since then?&#8221;</p>
<p>That is EXACTLY the point. How many Bombs have we needed to?</p>
<p>The Japanese were as fanatical in their day as the jihadists are today, and they were even more brutal. They had beheading of captured Americans down to an art, and because of their brutality towards captured Marines on the battlefield the war in the Pacific was no-holds-barred. </p>
<p>How did we beat the fanatical Japanese, who were using suicide bombers before it was cool? We killed enough of them to make the rest realize that they couldn&#8217;t win.</p>
<p>We haven&#8217;t killed enough of the jihadists yet. Unfortunately, we need to kill more. Bush was right to move into Iraq, to try to &#8220;drain the swamp&#8221;, but Iran is really the alligator nest over there, the pus-filled boil on the Earth&#8217;s posterior, and until it&#8217;s lanced and drained Iran will be a PITA that, like an infection, threatens us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clarice feldman</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/comment-page-1/#comment-520489</link>
		<dc:creator>clarice feldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/#comment-520489</guid>
		<description>Beats having to kill innocent civilians. There, I've said it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beats having to kill innocent civilians. There, I&#8217;ve said it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadly, No! &#187; Wingnuttery Withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/comment-page-1/#comment-520350</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadly, No! &#187; Wingnuttery Withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/#comment-520350</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: Jesus Christ. Why did I have to read Dan Riehl. Why in God&#8217;s name did I have to read Dan Riehl: Seeing the reaction to a post by Instapundit  We should be responding quietly, killing radical mullahs and iranian atomic scientists, supporting the simmering insurgencies within Iran, putting the mullahs&#8217; expat business interests out of business, etc. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: Jesus Christ. Why did I have to read Dan Riehl. Why in God&#8217;s name did I have to read Dan Riehl: Seeing the reaction to a post by Instapundit  We should be responding quietly, killing radical mullahs and iranian atomic scientists, supporting the simmering insurgencies within Iran, putting the mullahs&#8217; expat business interests out of business, etc. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hardy</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/comment-page-1/#comment-520347</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/#comment-520347</guid>
		<description>One can wage war in the traditional manner, and kill hundreds of thousands of the opposition's young men, and demolish a nation's infrastructure... of just take out the people who are problems.

But big names are unlikely to initiate a form of warfare in which they are the first rather than the last targets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One can wage war in the traditional manner, and kill hundreds of thousands of the opposition&#8217;s young men, and demolish a nation&#8217;s infrastructure&#8230; of just take out the people who are problems.</p>
<p>But big names are unlikely to initiate a form of warfare in which they are the first rather than the last targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAWolf</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/comment-page-1/#comment-520343</link>
		<dc:creator>JAWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/13/acting-barbarously-to-defeat-the-barbarians/#comment-520343</guid>
		<description>I disagree with your last sentence.  UNFIL shields Hizbollah from Israeli retaliation and lets the terrorists act with impunity.

As for your larger points, Lambchop is an ass (duh).  Iran has been at war with the US pretty much since 1979.  And as nice as the thought of Ahmendidjad getting a 50 Cal lobotomy, he is the manifestation of the larger disease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with your last sentence.  UNFIL shields Hizbollah from Israeli retaliation and lets the terrorists act with impunity.</p>
<p>As for your larger points, Lambchop is an ass (duh).  Iran has been at war with the US pretty much since 1979.  And as nice as the thought of Ahmendidjad getting a 50 Cal lobotomy, he is the manifestation of the larger disease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
