<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RUDY&#8217;S 9/11 DILEMMA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Reality</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-632426</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/#comment-632426</guid>
		<description>911 nutcases? When someone points out obvious deceptions, coverups and 'coincidental'anomalies they are nutcases? Only someone who would take the 911 event on governmental face value has the truth in story right? Un flippin'believable!
Of course no one should question any of it right? Just move along nothing to see here.
So what if there were 15 war games ongoing that day, 5 involving live hijack scenarios that no one seems interested in. So what if the 40% occupied twin towers were undergoing galvanic corrosion and asbestos breaching and were insured in June 01 specifically  for terrorist attacks, ah, thats nothing suspicious.And how did amateur pilots outwit the multi billion dollar airforce in the most protected airspace on earth for nearly two hours without one shot fired and we cannot see the Pentagon video footage? As you know there are cameras every 90 ft. on the buildings perimeter as well as SAMs to protect the building. And what of the multitudes of eyewitnesses describing flt 93 being shot down. Oh well we nutcases should never ask questions we should let authors of sites like these do it for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>911 nutcases? When someone points out obvious deceptions, coverups and &#8216;coincidental&#8217;anomalies they are nutcases? Only someone who would take the 911 event on governmental face value has the truth in story right? Un flippin&#8217;believable!<br />
Of course no one should question any of it right? Just move along nothing to see here.<br />
So what if there were 15 war games ongoing that day, 5 involving live hijack scenarios that no one seems interested in. So what if the 40% occupied twin towers were undergoing galvanic corrosion and asbestos breaching and were insured in June 01 specifically  for terrorist attacks, ah, thats nothing suspicious.And how did amateur pilots outwit the multi billion dollar airforce in the most protected airspace on earth for nearly two hours without one shot fired and we cannot see the Pentagon video footage? As you know there are cameras every 90 ft. on the buildings perimeter as well as SAMs to protect the building. And what of the multitudes of eyewitnesses describing flt 93 being shot down. Oh well we nutcases should never ask questions we should let authors of sites like these do it for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toscana</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-630979</link>
		<dc:creator>toscana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/#comment-630979</guid>
		<description>E grande io ha trovato il vostro luogo! Le info importanti ottenute! ))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E grande io ha trovato il vostro luogo! Le info importanti ottenute! ))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-521805</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 02:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/#comment-521805</guid>
		<description>NYC 8.1 million
LA  3.8 million
Chi 2.8 million

source infoplease http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0763098.html

By the way it isn't just the 9/11 narrative.  New York City is a radically different city than te one I left  in 1995; cleaner, safer, more friendly.  The credit for all of that belongs to Rudy Giulianni and his team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NYC 8.1 million<br />
LA  3.8 million<br />
Chi 2.8 million</p>
<p>source infoplease <a href="http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0763098.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0763098.html</a></p>
<p>By the way it isn&#8217;t just the 9/11 narrative.  New York City is a radically different city than te one I left  in 1995; cleaner, safer, more friendly.  The credit for all of that belongs to Rudy Giulianni and his team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tano</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-521397</link>
		<dc:creator>Tano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/#comment-521397</guid>
		<description>"a high profile mayor of the second largest city in the country"

? Am I missing some city here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a high profile mayor of the second largest city in the country&#8221;</p>
<p>? Am I missing some city here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brown</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-521276</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/#comment-521276</guid>
		<description>"The antiquated New York emergency services communications system shattered under the city-wide disaster â€“ some say as a consequence of the mayorâ€™s inattentiveness and shortsightedness."

I think if you check your facts you will find that a relatively new emergency operations center had been located in the WTC upon the decision of Guilani to locate it there, even after the 1993 bombing of the building.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The antiquated New York emergency services communications system shattered under the city-wide disaster â€“ some say as a consequence of the mayorâ€™s inattentiveness and shortsightedness.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think if you check your facts you will find that a relatively new emergency operations center had been located in the WTC upon the decision of Guilani to locate it there, even after the 1993 bombing of the building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Purdie</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-521217</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Purdie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/#comment-521217</guid>
		<description>I think the biggest question he'll have to answer is his support for the war effort in Iraq at a time when popular support is waning.  I think he can win the GOP nomination by drawing himself tougher and more aggressive than Bush, but that may, at the same time, alienate him from General Election voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the biggest question he&#8217;ll have to answer is his support for the war effort in Iraq at a time when popular support is waning.  I think he can win the GOP nomination by drawing himself tougher and more aggressive than Bush, but that may, at the same time, alienate him from General Election voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauralynne</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-521176</link>
		<dc:creator>lauralynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/15/rudys-911-dilemma/#comment-521176</guid>
		<description>I remember his photo-ops riding around NYC jumping in front of the cops when they'd bust a little drug ring in a bodega or something.  

As a right-wing nut, I'm surprised you didn't mention his widely-known extra-marital affair.

from Salon:  

...He assumed an unusually vulnerable mien and launched into a long series of reflections about the state of his marriage, appearing unsure at times of what he would say. "I, um, this is very, very painful. Um, for um, quite some time I, it's probably been apparent that Donna and I, uh, lead, um, ind -- in many ways, independent and separate lives. It's been a very painful road and I'm hopeful that we'll be able to, um, to formalize that in, in an agreement that protects our children, that gives them all the security and all the protection they deserve, and protects Donna. And that's something we have to work -- that's something we have to work out, we have to strive toward."

Between Giulianin and Mitt Romney and his magic Mormon underwear... oh, well, never mind....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember his photo-ops riding around NYC jumping in front of the cops when they&#8217;d bust a little drug ring in a bodega or something.  </p>
<p>As a right-wing nut, I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t mention his widely-known extra-marital affair.</p>
<p>from Salon:  </p>
<p>&#8230;He assumed an unusually vulnerable mien and launched into a long series of reflections about the state of his marriage, appearing unsure at times of what he would say. &#8220;I, um, this is very, very painful. Um, for um, quite some time I, it&#8217;s probably been apparent that Donna and I, uh, lead, um, ind &#8212; in many ways, independent and separate lives. It&#8217;s been a very painful road and I&#8217;m hopeful that we&#8217;ll be able to, um, to formalize that in, in an agreement that protects our children, that gives them all the security and all the protection they deserve, and protects Donna. And that&#8217;s something we have to work &#8212; that&#8217;s something we have to work out, we have to strive toward.&#8221;</p>
<p>Between Giulianin and Mitt Romney and his magic Mormon underwear&#8230; oh, well, never mind&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
