<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A ROCK, A HARD PLACE, AND THE DEEP BLUE SEA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 04:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Soccer Dad</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-542039</link>
		<dc:creator>Soccer Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/#comment-542039</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;If ... you must 03/01/2007&lt;/strong&gt;

If you haven't read the Great Asian game is heating up at Deja Vu ; you must. Also worth reading on Pakistan and war on terror are this, this and this. If you haven't read Judeopundit's Iran and Zimbabwe two countries with independent stances; you m...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>If &#8230; you must 03/01/2007</strong></p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t read the Great Asian game is heating up at Deja Vu ; you must. Also worth reading on Pakistan and war on terror are this, this and this. If you haven&#8217;t read Judeopundit&#8217;s Iran and Zimbabwe two countries with independent stances; you m&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Council Has Spoken!</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-532581</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Council Has Spoken!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/#comment-532581</guid>
		<description>[...] The Watcher&#8217;s Council has announced its picks for the most outstanding posts of the preceding week. The winning Council post was Right Wing Nut House&#8217;s post, â€œSan Francisco Has Bigger Scandals Than a Debauched Mayorâ€. Looks like my vote put him over the top. Congratulations, Rick. There was a tie for second place honors between Joshupundit&#8217;s â€œI&#8217;m Tired of Supporting the Troopsâ€ and my own post, â€œThe Impossibility of Victoryâ€. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Watcher&#8217;s Council has announced its picks for the most outstanding posts of the preceding week. The winning Council post was Right Wing Nut House&#8217;s post, â€œSan Francisco Has Bigger Scandals Than a Debauched Mayorâ€. Looks like my vote put him over the top. Congratulations, Rick. There was a tie for second place honors between Joshupundit&#8217;s â€œI&#8217;m Tired of Supporting the Troopsâ€ and my own post, â€œThe Impossibility of Victoryâ€. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The COLOSSUS OF RHODEY</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-532565</link>
		<dc:creator>The COLOSSUS OF RHODEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/#comment-532565</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Watcher's Council results&lt;/strong&gt;

And now...&#160; the winning entries in the Watcher's Council vote for this week are A Rock, a Hard Place, and the Deep Blue Sea by Right Wing Nut House, and Islamist Historiography by Cross-Currents.&#160; All members, please be sure to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Watcher&#8217;s Council results</strong></p>
<p>And now&#8230;&nbsp; the winning entries in the Watcher&#8217;s Council vote for this week are A Rock, a Hard Place, and the Deep Blue Sea by Right Wing Nut House, and Islamist Historiography by Cross-Currents.&nbsp; All members, please be sure to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soccer Dad</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-532334</link>
		<dc:creator>Soccer Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/#comment-532334</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Council speak 02/23/2007&lt;/strong&gt;

The council has spoken and these are the results. On the Council side, Right Wing Nuthouse's A rock, a hard place and the deep blue sea was the winning entry. It considered how much of an ally Musharaaf really is. There was a second place tie between ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Council speak 02/23/2007</strong></p>
<p>The council has spoken and these are the results. On the Council side, Right Wing Nuthouse&#8217;s A rock, a hard place and the deep blue sea was the winning entry. It considered how much of an ally Musharaaf really is. There was a second place tie between &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-529581</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/#comment-529581</guid>
		<description>[...] Right Wing Nut House, â€œA Rock, a Hard Place, and the Deep Blue Seaâ€ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Right Wing Nut House, â€œA Rock, a Hard Place, and the Deep Blue Seaâ€ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syl</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-529282</link>
		<dc:creator>Syl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/#comment-529282</guid>
		<description>"...DEFEATING the Taliban and al-qaeda (not just running them out of town)..."

LOL

I think al-qaeda and the taliban had something to say about that---like running off to Pakistan whenever the going got rough. Ever look at the area with Google Maps?

As Rick said, some people just don't GET that people other than Americans make decisions too. 

Hey achmed what do you think? I think we go now and come back to fight again in another week. Maybe. Or next month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;DEFEATING the Taliban and al-qaeda (not just running them out of town)&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL</p>
<p>I think al-qaeda and the taliban had something to say about that&#8212;like running off to Pakistan whenever the going got rough. Ever look at the area with Google Maps?</p>
<p>As Rick said, some people just don&#8217;t GET that people other than Americans make decisions too. </p>
<p>Hey achmed what do you think? I think we go now and come back to fight again in another week. Maybe. Or next month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedom Fighter</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-529197</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedom Fighter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/#comment-529197</guid>
		<description>Hey Rick,
Good post,but I can't say I agree with you totally.

The 500 lb monkey on America's back and the explanation for Bush's seemingly inexplicable behavior is the Saudis, plain and simple...along with the other Sunni autocracies our president is so fond of.

Their influence on political figures on both sides of the aisle is a cancer, especially with this president.

It's why the president,instead of putting the country on a war footing advised us all to calm down and go shopping.

It's why we got involved in Iraq, why it became such a mess and why we continue to fund Palestinian terrorists, and why so little has been done to stop the importation of jihad into our country.

It's why we continue to fight half a war.

As for Musharref &lt;a href="http://joshuapundit.blogspot.com/2006/09/musharraf-threatens-west-as-india.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;he has NEVER been an ally &lt;/a&gt;in the true sense of the word, partly because he can't be and partly,  like much of the Muslim world, because he's still waiting to see which way the wind ends up blowing.

If he's truly in control, then he has the ability to stop Pakistan from being a haven for al Qaeda and the Taliban, even if it simply means allowing coalition forces to go in after them and kill them. If he's not in control, why bother bribing him?

As you mention, we invaded Iraq and Afghanistan on the basis that they were harboring our enemies and were a threat, so why should Pakistan be any different - or Iran?

If Musharref wasn't cooperating, we should have made our displeasure known rather forcefully,so that he understood that it was in his best interests to cooperate if he still wanted a country in one piece.

Now, with the country disgusted with Bush's lack of leadership and al Qaeda and the Taliban even more firmly entrenched then they were, it will be a much more difficult job.

Just as with Iran,the president is allowing hostile forces to strike at our troops with impunity in the name of `hearts and minds' while handcuffing our forces with ridiculous rules of engagement and locking them into a defensive war of attrition.

This goes back to Bush's refusal to take the war seriously, do what is necessary for victory and of course, his dread of upsetting his Saudi pals.

Unless he changes course fairly quickly, he will go down in history as America's Neville Chamberlain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rick,<br />
Good post,but I can&#8217;t say I agree with you totally.</p>
<p>The 500 lb monkey on America&#8217;s back and the explanation for Bush&#8217;s seemingly inexplicable behavior is the Saudis, plain and simple&#8230;along with the other Sunni autocracies our president is so fond of.</p>
<p>Their influence on political figures on both sides of the aisle is a cancer, especially with this president.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s why the president,instead of putting the country on a war footing advised us all to calm down and go shopping.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s why we got involved in Iraq, why it became such a mess and why we continue to fund Palestinian terrorists, and why so little has been done to stop the importation of jihad into our country.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s why we continue to fight half a war.</p>
<p>As for Musharref <a href="http://joshuapundit.blogspot.com/2006/09/musharraf-threatens-west-as-india.html" rel="nofollow">he has NEVER been an ally </a>in the true sense of the word, partly because he can&#8217;t be and partly,  like much of the Muslim world, because he&#8217;s still waiting to see which way the wind ends up blowing.</p>
<p>If he&#8217;s truly in control, then he has the ability to stop Pakistan from being a haven for al Qaeda and the Taliban, even if it simply means allowing coalition forces to go in after them and kill them. If he&#8217;s not in control, why bother bribing him?</p>
<p>As you mention, we invaded Iraq and Afghanistan on the basis that they were harboring our enemies and were a threat, so why should Pakistan be any different - or Iran?</p>
<p>If Musharref wasn&#8217;t cooperating, we should have made our displeasure known rather forcefully,so that he understood that it was in his best interests to cooperate if he still wanted a country in one piece.</p>
<p>Now, with the country disgusted with Bush&#8217;s lack of leadership and al Qaeda and the Taliban even more firmly entrenched then they were, it will be a much more difficult job.</p>
<p>Just as with Iran,the president is allowing hostile forces to strike at our troops with impunity in the name of `hearts and minds&#8217; while handcuffing our forces with ridiculous rules of engagement and locking them into a defensive war of attrition.</p>
<p>This goes back to Bush&#8217;s refusal to take the war seriously, do what is necessary for victory and of course, his dread of upsetting his Saudi pals.</p>
<p>Unless he changes course fairly quickly, he will go down in history as America&#8217;s Neville Chamberlain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-529131</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/#comment-529131</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Submitted for Your Approval&lt;/strong&gt;

First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher's Council for this week's vote. Council li...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Submitted for Your Approval</strong></p>
<p>First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council for this week&#8217;s vote. Council li&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Thunder Run</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-528551</link>
		<dc:creator>The Thunder Run</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/#comment-528551</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web Reconnaissance for 02/20/2007&lt;/strong&gt;

A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web Reconnaissance for 02/20/2007</strong></p>
<p>A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windrider</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-528273</link>
		<dc:creator>windrider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/02/19/a-rock-a-hard-place-and-the-deep-blue-sea/#comment-528273</guid>
		<description>If Bush had not been in such a hurry to invade Iraq, and had kept his attention (and this country's resources) focused on Afghanistan, DEFEATING the Taliban and al-qaeda (not just running them out of town),  Pakistan would have had almost no one to give sanctuary to.  Bush's weakness is that he NEVER pays attention to anything that is not on his very personal agenda, until reality compels him to make an appearance and make meaningless promises (like in New Orleans, Kabul, and Baghdad, where he promised limitless resources, rebuilding, yada yada yada, and broke every promise as soon as the TV lights went out).

Bush's neglect of the pursuit and defeat of ONLY ENEMY THAT COUNTS, to pursue neo-con wet dreams of controlling Iraq and Iran, has allowed al-qaeda to reconstitute and regain its control.  There is no one to blame BUT Bush for the malignant neglect of the true priority in the 'War on Terror' to pursue ideological goals elsewhere.

I agree that Musharaff is between a rock and a hard place, with no wiggle room.  But if we'd done the job right in Afghanistan, he wouldn't have Taliban and al-qaeda training camps on Pakistani soil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Bush had not been in such a hurry to invade Iraq, and had kept his attention (and this country&#8217;s resources) focused on Afghanistan, DEFEATING the Taliban and al-qaeda (not just running them out of town),  Pakistan would have had almost no one to give sanctuary to.  Bush&#8217;s weakness is that he NEVER pays attention to anything that is not on his very personal agenda, until reality compels him to make an appearance and make meaningless promises (like in New Orleans, Kabul, and Baghdad, where he promised limitless resources, rebuilding, yada yada yada, and broke every promise as soon as the TV lights went out).</p>
<p>Bush&#8217;s neglect of the pursuit and defeat of ONLY ENEMY THAT COUNTS, to pursue neo-con wet dreams of controlling Iraq and Iran, has allowed al-qaeda to reconstitute and regain its control.  There is no one to blame BUT Bush for the malignant neglect of the true priority in the &#8216;War on Terror&#8217; to pursue ideological goals elsewhere.</p>
<p>I agree that Musharaff is between a rock and a hard place, with no wiggle room.  But if we&#8217;d done the job right in Afghanistan, he wouldn&#8217;t have Taliban and al-qaeda training camps on Pakistani soil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
