<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MAHER: BEYOND POLITICALLY INCORRECT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 03:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Basa Ulaanbatar</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/comment-page-1/#comment-550959</link>
		<dc:creator>Basa Ulaanbatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/#comment-550959</guid>
		<description>Maher is on the "right side" politically like you're on the "straight side" of sex, Mr. Antiphone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maher is on the &#8220;right side&#8221; politically like you&#8217;re on the &#8220;straight side&#8221; of sex, Mr. Antiphone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basa Ulaanbatar</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/comment-page-1/#comment-550957</link>
		<dc:creator>Basa Ulaanbatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/#comment-550957</guid>
		<description>Antiphone--I disagree with the Bush administration (stupid and incompetent--why go in to Iraq if not as a precursor to invading Iran and Syria?  Hello!!!).  I hardly think these good folks would classify me as a liberal, however.  Methinks the lady doth protest too much.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antiphone&#8211;I disagree with the Bush administration (stupid and incompetent&#8211;why go in to Iraq if not as a precursor to invading Iran and Syria?  Hello!!!).  I hardly think these good folks would classify me as a liberal, however.  Methinks the lady doth protest too much&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h2o273kk9</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/comment-page-1/#comment-548915</link>
		<dc:creator>h2o273kk9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/#comment-548915</guid>
		<description>antiphone said
" To claim heâ€™s a liberal demonstrates a childish simplification of terminology that categorizes everyone who disagrees with the Bush administration as â€œliberalâ€. "

I see no evidence he is broad brushing everyone who disagrees with the Bush administration as â€œliberalâ€. 

Where are you reading this? He was talking about Maher and those like Maher. How do you leap to the conclusion that he includes the rest. It appears that you may be the one guilty of sweeping statements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>antiphone said<br />
&#8221; To claim heâ€™s a liberal demonstrates a childish simplification of terminology that categorizes everyone who disagrees with the Bush administration as â€œliberalâ€. &#8221;</p>
<p>I see no evidence he is broad brushing everyone who disagrees with the Bush administration as â€œliberalâ€. </p>
<p>Where are you reading this? He was talking about Maher and those like Maher. How do you leap to the conclusion that he includes the rest. It appears that you may be the one guilty of sweeping statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antiphone</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/comment-page-1/#comment-548348</link>
		<dc:creator>antiphone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/#comment-548348</guid>
		<description>Maher is a self proclaimed Libertarian who endorsed Bob Dole in 96. You may not think heâ€™s a proper Libertarian but thatâ€™s a different issue. To claim heâ€™s a liberal demonstrates a childish simplification of terminology that categorizes everyone who disagrees with the Bush administration as â€œliberalâ€. Itâ€™s the political philosophy of Animal Farm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maher is a self proclaimed Libertarian who endorsed Bob Dole in 96. You may not think heâ€™s a proper Libertarian but thatâ€™s a different issue. To claim heâ€™s a liberal demonstrates a childish simplification of terminology that categorizes everyone who disagrees with the Bush administration as â€œliberalâ€. Itâ€™s the political philosophy of Animal Farm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/comment-page-1/#comment-547890</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 18:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/#comment-547890</guid>
		<description>"Oh, and do actually think this kind of writing makes you sound intelligent?"

Do you think being ignorant of political philosophy makes you sound intelligent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and do actually think this kind of writing makes you sound intelligent?&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you think being ignorant of political philosophy makes you sound intelligent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/comment-page-1/#comment-547887</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 18:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/#comment-547887</guid>
		<description>"Huh, last I heard Maher was a Libertarian"

Maher has said he is a "left-wing libertarian", when there is no such thing.  Libertarianism is, by definition, a right wing philosophy.  In fact, it's farther right than "normal" conservativism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Huh, last I heard Maher was a Libertarian&#8221;</p>
<p>Maher has said he is a &#8220;left-wing libertarian&#8221;, when there is no such thing.  Libertarianism is, by definition, a right wing philosophy.  In fact, it&#8217;s farther right than &#8220;normal&#8221; conservativism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h2o273kk9</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/comment-page-1/#comment-547782</link>
		<dc:creator>h2o273kk9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/#comment-547782</guid>
		<description>Antiphone,
"Hmm, itâ€™s splitting hairs but no, I see you didnâ€™t actually include the blog commenters. But the phrase â€œliberals like Maherâ€, clearly does attempt to portray one (Libertarian) opinion as representative of liberals."

Actually, I believe the phrase "liberals like Maher" identifies an as yet unnamed subset of liberals. After all, there are many stripes of liberals and he clearly is not referring to "liberals UNlike Maher".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antiphone,<br />
&#8220;Hmm, itâ€™s splitting hairs but no, I see you didnâ€™t actually include the blog commenters. But the phrase â€œliberals like Maherâ€, clearly does attempt to portray one (Libertarian) opinion as representative of liberals.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, I believe the phrase &#8220;liberals like Maher&#8221; identifies an as yet unnamed subset of liberals. After all, there are many stripes of liberals and he clearly is not referring to &#8220;liberals UNlike Maher&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antiphone</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/comment-page-1/#comment-547748</link>
		<dc:creator>antiphone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/#comment-547748</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;As for reaction from the left?&lt;/i&gt;

Why should there be a reaction specifically from the left? What happened to the logic of Ann Coulter is a â€œcontroversy slutâ€ whoâ€™s provocations should be ignored:

&lt;i&gt;Why in Godâ€™s name the left falls for it and why the right then feels the need to respond is absolutely nuts!&lt;/i&gt;

Why should â€œthe leftâ€ have to respond to Maher whoâ€™s on the right side of the political spectrum (Libertarian) and makes a living saying â€œpolitically incorrectâ€ things, not to mention the fact that he has no role whatsoever in left leaning politics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As for reaction from the left?</i></p>
<p>Why should there be a reaction specifically from the left? What happened to the logic of Ann Coulter is a â€œcontroversy slutâ€ whoâ€™s provocations should be ignored:</p>
<p><i>Why in Godâ€™s name the left falls for it and why the right then feels the need to respond is absolutely nuts!</i></p>
<p>Why should â€œthe leftâ€ have to respond to Maher whoâ€™s on the right side of the political spectrum (Libertarian) and makes a living saying â€œpolitically incorrectâ€ things, not to mention the fact that he has no role whatsoever in left leaning politics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antiphone</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/comment-page-1/#comment-547661</link>
		<dc:creator>antiphone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 15:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/#comment-547661</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It is obvious your cognitive abilities donâ€™t quite measure up, do they? Maybe you can ask some local 8 year old to help you read. Because judging by your comment, you havenâ€™t reached that level of reading comprehension yet.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, and do actually think this kind of writing makes you sound intelligent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It is obvious your cognitive abilities donâ€™t quite measure up, do they? Maybe you can ask some local 8 year old to help you read. Because judging by your comment, you havenâ€™t reached that level of reading comprehension yet.</i></p>
<p>Oh, and do actually think this kind of writing makes you sound intelligent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antiphone</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/comment-page-1/#comment-547649</link>
		<dc:creator>antiphone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/03/maher-beyond-politically-incorrect/#comment-547649</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And why is the fall back position of liberals like Maher that the poor sots who were cheering on the jihadi trying to kill Cheney were the real victims â€“ victims of censorship?&lt;/i&gt;

Hmm, itâ€™s splitting hairs but no, I see you didnâ€™t actually include the blog commenters. But the phrase â€œ&lt;i&gt;liberals like Maher&lt;/i&gt;â€, clearly does attempt to portray one (Libertarian) opinion as representative of liberals.

Do you deny it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And why is the fall back position of liberals like Maher that the poor sots who were cheering on the jihadi trying to kill Cheney were the real victims â€“ victims of censorship?</i></p>
<p>Hmm, itâ€™s splitting hairs but no, I see you didnâ€™t actually include the blog commenters. But the phrase â€œ<i>liberals like Maher</i>â€, clearly does attempt to portray one (Libertarian) opinion as representative of liberals.</p>
<p>Do you deny it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
