Two profiles of just one juror

From the Legal Times

http://tinyurl.com/2j2ef4

Seat 9, Juror 1869: A white male and a former Washington Post
reporter who once had Bob Woodward as an editor. He used to share space
with Tim Russert of “Meet the Press.” While he had questions about the
Bush administration’s rationale for going to war, he said that, “I’m
very skeptical about everything I hear until I see it backed up.”

Described in the Washington Post

http://tinyurl.com/2puzpk

Another candidate, the former Post journalist, seemed to have a link
to nearly every key player in the case. He had worked in the
newspaper’s Metro section, he said, where his editor was Woodward, a
key defense witness. Until recently, he lived across an alley from
Russert, a star witness for the prosecution. And he had gone to parties
with The Post’s Walter Pincus, another defense witness.

He said
he would understand if the lawyers believed he couldn’t be impartial,
but he promised he would use his reporter training to sort through the
facts fairly.

“If I were in your seats, I’d be skeptical,” he said.

Right Wing Nuthouse gets the Libby verdict down in a (four paragraph) nutshell Instead, all they got was Scooter Libby who lied to the FBI and the Grand Jury about who told him what and when about a non-clandestine CIA agent who was married to someone …

And the evidence, please………….

The guy that outed secret agent Plame was named Armitrage. That’s A. R. M. I. T. A. G. E. Why don’t you go make a citizen’s arrest already?

Libby should have avoided all the crap by just pulling a sHrillary and saying he couldn’t remember, can’t recall, has no memory of anything at all.

If real criminals get pardoned with not ever facing actual jeopardy (see marc rich), I see nothing wrong with libby getting pardoned here. Let the Kos Kids/Huffs howl.