<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PLAME STILL LEAVES US WONDERING</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SShiell</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/comment-page-1/#comment-582601</link>
		<dc:creator>SShiell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/#comment-582601</guid>
		<description>"Want to Know" and "Need to Know" are two completely different things.  How would Libby have known Plame was undercover?  Does he have a folder in his office that's labeled "Undercover CIA Officers"?  No.  He would have to contact someone over at the CIA and ask about her status.  Any hint of that come out in any of the reports or discussions of this so-called outing?  Not that I have heard about.  From Libby or Armitage or anybody else for that matter.

Could Libby have known she worked at the CIA?  Yes - even I can access various publications and find a name and a phone number.  Those directories are available all over DC for the various agencies.  And just because someone works at the CIA, it is not a "Red Flag".  I should know because my wife worked there for 20 years and never held a clearance above Secret but she was not "covert" and worked in an office full of people who were not "covert".  I even have an old phone directory of the CIA dated 2001 and guess what - Valerie Plame's name, office and phone number is in there!  Any star or special symbols by her name to indicate she was covert?  Uh, No. 

You can also call over at the CIA and ask for a phone number - guess what - there is a directory assistance over there that will give you a person's phone number essentially if it is available through the same printed directory.  Call it - the number is (703)482-0623.  The website is also really easy - www.cia.gov - and the same phone number is posted there and they even a point of contact available "To Verify a CIA Employee's Employment" if you are a mortgage company, creditor or potential employer.

As far as any limits to what the President or VP has access to, there are none that I know about.  But i can tell you that any inquiry by anybody on the White House staff start fevers boiling all over DC.  A staff member from the White House calls over for some information and entire staffs are called out in lock step formation, if necessary, to return the info.  I have seen General Officers in the Pentagon in a veritable slather trying to get information to a member of the National Security Office and if you are tasked with a "Presidential Inquiry" you have Cart Blanche throughout the entire building.

So the thought of someone on the White House staff calling around and to quietly get some information is patently bullsh*t.  It doesn't happen that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Want to Know&#8221; and &#8220;Need to Know&#8221; are two completely different things.  How would Libby have known Plame was undercover?  Does he have a folder in his office that&#8217;s labeled &#8220;Undercover CIA Officers&#8221;?  No.  He would have to contact someone over at the CIA and ask about her status.  Any hint of that come out in any of the reports or discussions of this so-called outing?  Not that I have heard about.  From Libby or Armitage or anybody else for that matter.</p>
<p>Could Libby have known she worked at the CIA?  Yes - even I can access various publications and find a name and a phone number.  Those directories are available all over DC for the various agencies.  And just because someone works at the CIA, it is not a &#8220;Red Flag&#8221;.  I should know because my wife worked there for 20 years and never held a clearance above Secret but she was not &#8220;covert&#8221; and worked in an office full of people who were not &#8220;covert&#8221;.  I even have an old phone directory of the CIA dated 2001 and guess what - Valerie Plame&#8217;s name, office and phone number is in there!  Any star or special symbols by her name to indicate she was covert?  Uh, No. </p>
<p>You can also call over at the CIA and ask for a phone number - guess what - there is a directory assistance over there that will give you a person&#8217;s phone number essentially if it is available through the same printed directory.  Call it - the number is (703)482-0623.  The website is also really easy - <a href="http://www.cia.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.cia.gov</a> - and the same phone number is posted there and they even a point of contact available &#8220;To Verify a CIA Employee&#8217;s Employment&#8221; if you are a mortgage company, creditor or potential employer.</p>
<p>As far as any limits to what the President or VP has access to, there are none that I know about.  But i can tell you that any inquiry by anybody on the White House staff start fevers boiling all over DC.  A staff member from the White House calls over for some information and entire staffs are called out in lock step formation, if necessary, to return the info.  I have seen General Officers in the Pentagon in a veritable slather trying to get information to a member of the National Security Office and if you are tasked with a &#8220;Presidential Inquiry&#8221; you have Cart Blanche throughout the entire building.</p>
<p>So the thought of someone on the White House staff calling around and to quietly get some information is patently bullsh*t.  It doesn&#8217;t happen that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drongo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/comment-page-1/#comment-582175</link>
		<dc:creator>Drongo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/#comment-582175</guid>
		<description>"The second, and the one area most misunderstood by the public is â€œNeed To Knowâ€."

OK, so in this context the people involved (according to the story) would have said that they wanted to know. 

Frankly, when you are talking about the President and Vice President, there aren't any limits to what they could know if they wanted to, are there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The second, and the one area most misunderstood by the public is â€œNeed To Knowâ€.&#8221;</p>
<p>OK, so in this context the people involved (according to the story) would have said that they wanted to know. </p>
<p>Frankly, when you are talking about the President and Vice President, there aren&#8217;t any limits to what they could know if they wanted to, are there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SShiell</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/comment-page-1/#comment-581834</link>
		<dc:creator>SShiell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/#comment-581834</guid>
		<description>"They have the security clearance to know pretty much anything, donâ€™t they?"

For someone to seek information that is classified, two things must be present before the information can be granted.  

The first is the appropriate security clearance.  You must have a clearance equal to or greather than the information is rated.  A person with a Secret Clearance cannot have access to Top Secret material.

The second, and the one area most misunderstood by the public is "Need To Know".  Just because you have a clearance does not allow you to rifle through the files perusing the information that is there.  You have to have a legitimate "need to know" in order to access any classified material.  People who work with classified materials over time stay away from such material whenever they can.  I have held as high as a Top Secret clearance and to tell you the truth, I did not want to know.  If the information was material to my job - that was one thing.  If it was not - keep it the hell away from me!  The hassles with dealing with classified material and the penalties for mishandling such material minimized any curiosity I may have had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They have the security clearance to know pretty much anything, donâ€™t they?&#8221;</p>
<p>For someone to seek information that is classified, two things must be present before the information can be granted.  </p>
<p>The first is the appropriate security clearance.  You must have a clearance equal to or greather than the information is rated.  A person with a Secret Clearance cannot have access to Top Secret material.</p>
<p>The second, and the one area most misunderstood by the public is &#8220;Need To Know&#8221;.  Just because you have a clearance does not allow you to rifle through the files perusing the information that is there.  You have to have a legitimate &#8220;need to know&#8221; in order to access any classified material.  People who work with classified materials over time stay away from such material whenever they can.  I have held as high as a Top Secret clearance and to tell you the truth, I did not want to know.  If the information was material to my job - that was one thing.  If it was not - keep it the hell away from me!  The hassles with dealing with classified material and the penalties for mishandling such material minimized any curiosity I may have had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliticalCritic</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/comment-page-1/#comment-580614</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliticalCritic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/#comment-580614</guid>
		<description>I definitely see a made for TV movie coming out of this.  They're just waiting to see how the story ends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely see a made for TV movie coming out of this.  They&#8217;re just waiting to see how the story ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eliXelx</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/comment-page-1/#comment-580092</link>
		<dc:creator>eliXelx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/#comment-580092</guid>
		<description>We should not feel one jot or tittle (well OK, maybe a little tittle) of sympathy for a woman who made a living out of telling lies to help her country, and is now teling lies to hurt it!
Plame is a honey-trap; Wilson is pimp; and Richard Armitage, the self-defined "last honest man in Washington" (yes! he said that to the 9/11 Commission!) was the rejected guy who was never allowed to grab the gusto which sweet Val was dishing out, willy-nilly, to the rest of washington!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should not feel one jot or tittle (well OK, maybe a little tittle) of sympathy for a woman who made a living out of telling lies to help her country, and is now teling lies to hurt it!<br />
Plame is a honey-trap; Wilson is pimp; and Richard Armitage, the self-defined &#8220;last honest man in Washington&#8221; (yes! he said that to the 9/11 Commission!) was the rejected guy who was never allowed to grab the gusto which sweet Val was dishing out, willy-nilly, to the rest of washington!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drongo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/comment-page-1/#comment-579766</link>
		<dc:creator>Drongo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/#comment-579766</guid>
		<description>"Why werenâ€™t Rove and Cheney charged with the crime of exposing a covert agent? Why? Why? Why? "

Well, presumably because he didn't find enough evidence for a prosecution.

"WHy was scooter Libby prosecuted for outing a â€¦.....er, faulty memory?"

That's an easy one. He was indicted and convicted for lying to a grand jury which was trying to determine if there was any crime to be prosecuted.

I don't get why people are so quick to ignore perjury.

"Its not about Nukular weapons, but about Saddam seeking Yellowcake uranium in Niger. You donâ€™t even know what the central issue is about â€“ do you?"

That was, of course, nothing to do with the conviction for perjury. Perjury is lying under oath you see.

Besides, I continue to wonder about your judgement of the "We'll get to the bottom of this!" statement by your President followed by obviously not investigating it and not simply asking his closest advisors if they knew anything about it.

maybe your just getting so used to being lied to that you don't notice it anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why werenâ€™t Rove and Cheney charged with the crime of exposing a covert agent? Why? Why? Why? &#8221;</p>
<p>Well, presumably because he didn&#8217;t find enough evidence for a prosecution.</p>
<p>&#8220;WHy was scooter Libby prosecuted for outing a â€¦&#8230;..er, faulty memory?&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an easy one. He was indicted and convicted for lying to a grand jury which was trying to determine if there was any crime to be prosecuted.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get why people are so quick to ignore perjury.</p>
<p>&#8220;Its not about Nukular weapons, but about Saddam seeking Yellowcake uranium in Niger. You donâ€™t even know what the central issue is about â€“ do you?&#8221;</p>
<p>That was, of course, nothing to do with the conviction for perjury. Perjury is lying under oath you see.</p>
<p>Besides, I continue to wonder about your judgement of the &#8220;We&#8217;ll get to the bottom of this!&#8221; statement by your President followed by obviously not investigating it and not simply asking his closest advisors if they knew anything about it.</p>
<p>maybe your just getting so used to being lied to that you don&#8217;t notice it anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew phillips</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/comment-page-1/#comment-579408</link>
		<dc:creator>drew phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/#comment-579408</guid>
		<description>The CIA was obviously out to get the White House by requesting an official investigation as to Plame's outing. And we all know that the Attourney Generals Office is out to get he WH because they appointed Fitzgerald to do a sham of an investigation. 
Can you believe that Plame went to a press luncheon WITH HER HUSBAND(!) -- please, give me a break -- if you are really covert, you don't eat lunch. The WH knew this all along that she wasn't covert, because they didn't even launch an internal investigation. 
And this General Hayden,CIA Director, actually thinks he knows what a covert agent is within his own oganisation -- let's get real. And, my God, Plame has the incredible audacity to lie to Congress -- under oath -- about being covert on national television. 
Any right-minded person knows there is only one expert on what being covert actually is and that is the unbiased Victoria Toesing -- she worked for Reagan don't you know? Toesning didn't even need to ask Plames employer, the CIA, about Plame's status -- she just knew -- what a gal. 
I am just so tired of all the left-wing lunatics out there slandering the incontrovertable truth of the right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CIA was obviously out to get the White House by requesting an official investigation as to Plame&#8217;s outing. And we all know that the Attourney Generals Office is out to get he WH because they appointed Fitzgerald to do a sham of an investigation.<br />
Can you believe that Plame went to a press luncheon WITH HER HUSBAND(!) &#8212; please, give me a break &#8212; if you are really covert, you don&#8217;t eat lunch. The WH knew this all along that she wasn&#8217;t covert, because they didn&#8217;t even launch an internal investigation.<br />
And this General Hayden,CIA Director, actually thinks he knows what a covert agent is within his own oganisation &#8212; let&#8217;s get real. And, my God, Plame has the incredible audacity to lie to Congress &#8212; under oath &#8212; about being covert on national television.<br />
Any right-minded person knows there is only one expert on what being covert actually is and that is the unbiased Victoria Toesing &#8212; she worked for Reagan don&#8217;t you know? Toesning didn&#8217;t even need to ask Plames employer, the CIA, about Plame&#8217;s status &#8212; she just knew &#8212; what a gal.<br />
I am just so tired of all the left-wing lunatics out there slandering the incontrovertable truth of the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hallfasthero</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/comment-page-1/#comment-578133</link>
		<dc:creator>Hallfasthero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/#comment-578133</guid>
		<description>Criticising the Democrats for the whole "Plame affair" would carry more weight were it not for the obvious fact that GWB promised to get to the bottom of who leaked her information. Not only has he failed to do so, but it is clear why he never bothered. The issue that she was "not covert" as is repeated over and over was countered by her personally under oath in front of the Senate. Tell me when Karl rove and Scooter Libby apeared in front of the Senate, helping to get to the bottom of the leaker and protected the CIA covert operation protocol and then, only then, perhaps, your criticism of the Dems regarding undermining the CIA will carry some weight. You can't have it both ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Criticising the Democrats for the whole &#8220;Plame affair&#8221; would carry more weight were it not for the obvious fact that GWB promised to get to the bottom of who leaked her information. Not only has he failed to do so, but it is clear why he never bothered. The issue that she was &#8220;not covert&#8221; as is repeated over and over was countered by her personally under oath in front of the Senate. Tell me when Karl rove and Scooter Libby apeared in front of the Senate, helping to get to the bottom of the leaker and protected the CIA covert operation protocol and then, only then, perhaps, your criticism of the Dems regarding undermining the CIA will carry some weight. You can&#8217;t have it both ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pd</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/comment-page-1/#comment-577921</link>
		<dc:creator>pd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/#comment-577921</guid>
		<description>" The Dems put Valerie Plame under oath, where she lied to Congress a half-dozen times about her covert status and who sent her husband to Niger. "


I guess the fact that the current Director of the CIA, confirmed Plame's status as covert should in no way be taken to mean that yea she was actually covert or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; The Dems put Valerie Plame under oath, where she lied to Congress a half-dozen times about her covert status and who sent her husband to Niger. &#8221;</p>
<p>I guess the fact that the current Director of the CIA, confirmed Plame&#8217;s status as covert should in no way be taken to mean that yea she was actually covert or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drongo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/comment-page-1/#comment-577918</link>
		<dc:creator>Drongo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/03/17/plame-still-leaves-us-wondering/#comment-577918</guid>
		<description>"If her status was covert, and sheâ€™d done what was needed to protect it, then why would they simply happen to know she was CIA?"

I don't understand. The "They" in question are the highest members of the government. They have the security clearance to know pretty much anything, don't they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If her status was covert, and sheâ€™d done what was needed to protect it, then why would they simply happen to know she was CIA?&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand. The &#8220;They&#8221; in question are the highest members of the government. They have the security clearance to know pretty much anything, don&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
