Something that so many of these leftist tools who posted their comments fail to recognize is that this one visit by doped up on anti-psycho-meds-Nancy is not the only problem. It’s her history of far, far, far, far left wing activities and votes. It’s the culmination of all of her and her cohorts BS. Yeah… some RHINOS screw the pooch here and there but they don’t stand for everything that is anti-American. Marxism in particular.

I left the following comments on our site, but they hardly seem thoughtful and entertaining compared with your piece:

Trolling around the right-wing blogs today, I found the picture of Nancy Pelosi in Syria heading up every single one them, along with such titles as “Traitor,” “National Disgrace,” “Left-Wing Moonbats in the Middle East.” Though I usually just watch, amused with how outraged these right-wingers get with every step the Speaker takes, today I broke down and had to respond.

When did diplomacy become a crazy-left wing idea? On the 4 Right Wing Wackos site, I found the following blog entry:

“I mean, on one hand, this is just further proof that the Democrat/American Communist Party is the party of abject surrender. Nothing says “WE LOVE TERRORISTS” like going to a terrorist supporting country and fellating the pencil-necked leader.On the other hand, if she keeps this behavior up, after she is converted to Islam, she’ll be wearing a burkah and beaten when she speaks out of turn, so that could be a good thing. But only if she stays over there.I wonder, how much would we have to pay Syria to keep Pelosi?”

Is there anyone left in this country who believes that the Bush Administration has not utterly failed our country in the Foreign Policy department? Pat Buchanan said it, James Baker said it: talking to our enemies does not make things worse, and it has the potential to make things better. Ronald Reagan maintained an open dialogue with the Soviets all throughout the Cold War.

Attacking Pelosi for doing what needs to be done, what W hasn’t had the balls to do -simply because she is a democrat and they don’t like democrats- is anti-American.

Many of the right-wingers say that she is undermining the president’s authority. What authority? The president is the lamest of ducks. Democrats, Republicans and people around the world are just marking the days until that parasite leaves the Oval Office. Two more years before the United States can begin undoing the damage. One Mississippi, two Mississippi…

How can you fault Pelosi for not wanting to wait two more years to get this country back on track?

Do I criticize Pelosi for wearing a scarf? Not even implicitly. As I make absolutely crystal clear, it is the fanatics who should be criticized for insisting she wear one.

Oh - and just for the record.

I doubt whether anyone at the Vatican would have whipped the first lady for not wearing a veil as they do in Tehran.

When the First Lady visited the Vatican, she wore — wait for it — a head scarf. Apparently, it’s still required of women visitors to the Vatican. Is the right prepared to bash Roman Catholicism for having the same traditional rules as mosques in the Middle East?

For that matter, Pelosi’s own faith, Roman Catholicism, required women to wear veils in church until Vatican II — which took place when she was in her mid-twenties. We have all seen photographs of Karen Hughes and Condi Rice with scarves wrapped around their heads hijab-style while visiting the Middle East.

And, since you’re all such good christianists, perhaps you should go back an re-read the good book, to wit:

1 Corinthians 11:5,6

“But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.”

Wow, righties who are biblically illiterate. A report has been filed with Ayatollahs Dobson and Fallwell.

Please, keep it up. It’s fun watching bipeds who lack frontal lobes and opposable thumbs show how user-friendly computers are nowadays.

…Syria will be a pariah state anyway and Pelosi’s visit will be seen in retrospect as stupid and counterproductive.

History never holds Democrats properly accountable for their transgressions. If it did, the Democratic party would have disappeared after the Civil War. The Dominatrix of the House engaging in some absurd foreign policy antic will hardly warrant a footnote.

That’s about as good a piece of writing as the “What if Gore had won in 2000″ thing from FDl the other day. You do realise that, don’t you?

” I think a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian problem would be fewer Jews in Israel. That would make the Arabs less mad and lead to peace. ”

Nice.

Honestly, how would you feel if someone wrote a similar piece about someone you admire, suggesting that they thought that maybe if we had less Blacks in America we would have less murders. Answer, you would condemn them.

But then again - those Republicans were not the titular head of the Democratic party nor the highest ranking Democrat in government.

At least that’s the way the Syrians are spinning the visit. They’ve ignored the Republicans and concentrated exclusively on Pelosi’s “breakthrough” visit which, of course, gives a legitimacy to the thugs in Damascus they sorely need.

I am all for talking to Syria in a regional or international forum. But bi-lateral talks with a nation in the process of gobbling up its tiny neighbor, killing and murdering people who disagree with it in that country while trying to foment a civil war should be off the table.

Once the Hariri Tribunal gets going and the extent of Syrian involvement in the dozens of murders in Lebanon over the last two years becomes clear, Syria will be a pariah state anyway and Pelosi’s visit will be seen in retrospect as stupid and counterproductive.