<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NANCY PELOSI, PEACEMAKER OR KLUTZ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/</link>
	<description>Politics served up with a smile... And a stilletto.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tin Foil Hats - Speaker Pelosi &#171; Colorado Right</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/comment-page-1/#comment-620085</link>
		<dc:creator>Tin Foil Hats - Speaker Pelosi &#171; Colorado Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/#comment-620085</guid>
		<description>[...] Tin Foil Hats - Speaker&#160;Pelosi Rick Moran really gets to the nub of the matter: Now we know why Pelosi was wearing that head scarf in Damascus yesterday. It wasnâ€™t in deference to Muslim tradition. It was to keep her brains from dribbling out of her ears [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tin Foil Hats - Speaker&nbsp;Pelosi Rick Moran really gets to the nub of the matter: Now we know why Pelosi was wearing that head scarf in Damascus yesterday. It wasnâ€™t in deference to Muslim tradition. It was to keep her brains from dribbling out of her ears [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick D.</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/comment-page-1/#comment-618557</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 23:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/#comment-618557</guid>
		<description>Pelosi's Hastert Defense.

The following pathetic "Hypocrisy!' They Cried"* Pelosi defense that now Googles as a nascent Leftist blogswarm:

FLASHBACK: Hastert Traveled Abroad, Told Foreign Leaders Not To Listen To Clinton

"Speaker Pelosi has done nothing to suggest that she intended to speak on behalf of President Bush or the U.S. Government. But her predecessors havenâ€™t been so respectful.

In 1997, Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-IL) led a delegation to Colombia at a time when U.S. officials were trying to attach human rights conditions to U.S. security assistance programs. Hastert specifically encouraged Colombian military officials to â€œbypassâ€ President Clinton and â€œcommunicate directly with Congress.â€

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/04/hastert-colombia

****

There seems zero evidence that either President Clinton, V.P. Gore, or any of the Executive's inner circle at State or DoD ever complained about Hastert's negotiations with the Colombians.

In fact:

"Despite the fact that the U.S. and Colombia had yet to come to an agreement regarding human rights and end-use restrictions on such assistance, the Department of Defense in July 1997 sent a shipment of material designated for Colombian security forces under the presidentâ€™s â€œemergency drawdownâ€ authority.

Upon learning of the delivery, U.S. Ambassador Myles Frechette sent this cable complaining that the shipment â€œwill undermine Embassyâ€™s efforts to negotiate an End-Use Monitoring (EUM) agreement.â€

http://www.gwu.edu/%7Ensarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB69/part3.html#doc54

****

President Clinton and his DoD were apparently in agreement with [de facto authorized] Hastert... Ambassador Frechette's complaints as mischaracterized by "Think Progress" notwithstanding.

****

Thanks as always, you're site rocks!

P.S. 

'Hypocrisy!' He cried: an examination of a favorite charge
By Ramesh Ponnuru
6/20/05

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_11_57/ai_n15634308/print</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pelosi&#8217;s Hastert Defense.</p>
<p>The following pathetic &#8220;Hypocrisy!&#8217; They Cried&#8221;* Pelosi defense that now Googles as a nascent Leftist blogswarm:</p>
<p>FLASHBACK: Hastert Traveled Abroad, Told Foreign Leaders Not To Listen To Clinton</p>
<p>&#8220;Speaker Pelosi has done nothing to suggest that she intended to speak on behalf of President Bush or the U.S. Government. But her predecessors havenâ€™t been so respectful.</p>
<p>In 1997, Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-IL) led a delegation to Colombia at a time when U.S. officials were trying to attach human rights conditions to U.S. security assistance programs. Hastert specifically encouraged Colombian military officials to â€œbypassâ€ President Clinton and â€œcommunicate directly with Congress.â€</p>
<p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/04/hastert-colombia" rel="nofollow">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/04/hastert-colombia</a></p>
<p>****</p>
<p>There seems zero evidence that either President Clinton, V.P. Gore, or any of the Executive&#8217;s inner circle at State or DoD ever complained about Hastert&#8217;s negotiations with the Colombians.</p>
<p>In fact:</p>
<p>&#8220;Despite the fact that the U.S. and Colombia had yet to come to an agreement regarding human rights and end-use restrictions on such assistance, the Department of Defense in July 1997 sent a shipment of material designated for Colombian security forces under the presidentâ€™s â€œemergency drawdownâ€ authority.</p>
<p>Upon learning of the delivery, U.S. Ambassador Myles Frechette sent this cable complaining that the shipment â€œwill undermine Embassyâ€™s efforts to negotiate an End-Use Monitoring (EUM) agreement.â€</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gwu.edu/%7Ensarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB69/part3.html#doc54" rel="nofollow">http://www.gwu.edu/%7Ensarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB69/part3.html#doc54</a></p>
<p>****</p>
<p>President Clinton and his DoD were apparently in agreement with [de facto authorized] Hastert&#8230; Ambassador Frechette&#8217;s complaints as mischaracterized by &#8220;Think Progress&#8221; notwithstanding.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>Thanks as always, you&#8217;re site rocks!</p>
<p>P.S. </p>
<p>&#8216;Hypocrisy!&#8217; He cried: an examination of a favorite charge<br />
By Ramesh Ponnuru<br />
6/20/05</p>
<p><a href="http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_11_57/ai_n15634308/print" rel="nofollow">http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_11_57/ai_n15634308/print</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soccer Dad</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/comment-page-1/#comment-618495</link>
		<dc:creator>Soccer Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/#comment-618495</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Reactions to pelosi...&lt;/strong&gt;

Daled Amos writes Now Pelosi is back in the US and claiming what she did helped Bush. Pelosi is too modest--her debacle may very well end up helping the entire Republican Party. Gateway Pundit thinks that Pelosi violated the Logan Act. I don't doubt i...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reactions to pelosi&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Daled Amos writes Now Pelosi is back in the US and claiming what she did helped Bush. Pelosi is too modest&#8211;her debacle may very well end up helping the entire Republican Party. Gateway Pundit thinks that Pelosi violated the Logan Act. I don&#8217;t doubt i&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moran</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/comment-page-1/#comment-614754</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 21:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/#comment-614754</guid>
		<description>I could find nothing in the Trib that "shot down" any criticisms levelled at Pelosi, including her apparent gaffe in relaying an inaccurate message from Olmert to Assad.

There will be no retractions for criticizing the ranking Democrat in the country from giving any kind of legitimacy to this thug who, in a couple of months time when the evidence starts pouring into the open from the International Tribunal on Hariri's death that shows this man personally ordered the killings of Lebanese citizens, the world will howl in disgust and Pelosi's trip will be seen for the rank opportunism it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could find nothing in the Trib that &#8220;shot down&#8221; any criticisms levelled at Pelosi, including her apparent gaffe in relaying an inaccurate message from Olmert to Assad.</p>
<p>There will be no retractions for criticizing the ranking Democrat in the country from giving any kind of legitimacy to this thug who, in a couple of months time when the evidence starts pouring into the open from the International Tribunal on Hariri&#8217;s death that shows this man personally ordered the killings of Lebanese citizens, the world will howl in disgust and Pelosi&#8217;s trip will be seen for the rank opportunism it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hallfasthero</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/comment-page-1/#comment-614740</link>
		<dc:creator>Hallfasthero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 21:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/#comment-614740</guid>
		<description>Rick, 

Ms Peolsi's actions were neither improper or unethical. It appears you were savoring this opportunity to tear her down. The problem is that none of what was written by WaPo or the WSJ was accurate. In fact, it looks like a garden variety hit job. Your own Chicago Tribune shot down the articles in question about her conduct there. 

You are a fair person in general. Will you be offering any retractions or do you stand by your words because I am missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick, </p>
<p>Ms Peolsi&#8217;s actions were neither improper or unethical. It appears you were savoring this opportunity to tear her down. The problem is that none of what was written by WaPo or the WSJ was accurate. In fact, it looks like a garden variety hit job. Your own Chicago Tribune shot down the articles in question about her conduct there. </p>
<p>You are a fair person in general. Will you be offering any retractions or do you stand by your words because I am missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/comment-page-1/#comment-613228</link>
		<dc:creator>milo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 04:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/#comment-613228</guid>
		<description>Ten Years Ago:

&lt;i&gt;Speaking with startling bluntness on an issue so delicate that diplomats have tiptoed around it for years, Newt Gingrich said today that he had warned China's top leaders that the United States would intervene militarily if Taiwan was attacked.

As he left for Tokyo after a three-day trip to China, Mr. Gingrich said he had made it absolutely clear how the United States would respond if such a military conflict arose.

Referring to his meetings with China's leaders, Mr. Gingrich said: ''I said firmly, 'We want you to understand, we will defend Taiwan. Period.'"

He also said, ''I think that they are more aware now that we would defend Taiwan if it were militarily attacked.''

Mr. Gingrich, the Speaker of the House, delivered his message, among the most forceful ever given about Taiwan by a visiting United States official, to Wang Daohan, China's chief representative in talks with Taiwan. Mr. Gingrich said he had given the same message to President Jiang Zemin and Prime Minister Li Peng in Beijing last week.

Chinese leaders offered no public response to Mr. Gingrich today. But on Friday, Mr. Jiang urged him to treat the Taiwan issue with care. . . .

Asked about Mr. Gingrich's statements, a Clinton Administration official in Washington said Mr. Gingrich had received briefings about American policy toward China, but that Mr. Gingrich ''was speaking for himself'' in his conversations with Chinese leaders.

The White House issued a statement saying that the policy of the United States was to ''meet its obligation under the Taiwan Relations Act, including the maintenance of an adequate self-defense for Taiwan,'' and that the Administration would maintain its ''one-China policy, the fundamental bedrock of which is that both parties peacefully address the Taiwan issue. . . ."

In an interview on Friday, Mr. Gingrich said he had spoken with Mr. Clinton, and with Mr. Gore on several occasions, to make sure that their messages to Beijing dovetailed. At the time, he did not mention his message on Taiwan.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ten Years Ago:</p>
<p><i>Speaking with startling bluntness on an issue so delicate that diplomats have tiptoed around it for years, Newt Gingrich said today that he had warned China&#8217;s top leaders that the United States would intervene militarily if Taiwan was attacked.</p>
<p>As he left for Tokyo after a three-day trip to China, Mr. Gingrich said he had made it absolutely clear how the United States would respond if such a military conflict arose.</p>
<p>Referring to his meetings with China&#8217;s leaders, Mr. Gingrich said: &#8221;I said firmly, &#8216;We want you to understand, we will defend Taiwan. Period.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>He also said, &#8221;I think that they are more aware now that we would defend Taiwan if it were militarily attacked.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. Gingrich, the Speaker of the House, delivered his message, among the most forceful ever given about Taiwan by a visiting United States official, to Wang Daohan, China&#8217;s chief representative in talks with Taiwan. Mr. Gingrich said he had given the same message to President Jiang Zemin and Prime Minister Li Peng in Beijing last week.</p>
<p>Chinese leaders offered no public response to Mr. Gingrich today. But on Friday, Mr. Jiang urged him to treat the Taiwan issue with care. . . .</p>
<p>Asked about Mr. Gingrich&#8217;s statements, a Clinton Administration official in Washington said Mr. Gingrich had received briefings about American policy toward China, but that Mr. Gingrich &#8221;was speaking for himself&#8221; in his conversations with Chinese leaders.</p>
<p>The White House issued a statement saying that the policy of the United States was to &#8221;meet its obligation under the Taiwan Relations Act, including the maintenance of an adequate self-defense for Taiwan,&#8221; and that the Administration would maintain its &#8221;one-China policy, the fundamental bedrock of which is that both parties peacefully address the Taiwan issue. . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>In an interview on Friday, Mr. Gingrich said he had spoken with Mr. Clinton, and with Mr. Gore on several occasions, to make sure that their messages to Beijing dovetailed. At the time, he did not mention his message on Taiwan.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mkultra</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/comment-page-1/#comment-612703</link>
		<dc:creator>mkultra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/#comment-612703</guid>
		<description>Gosh, if only the wingnuts out there could get as worked up about the Iraqi fiasco as the do about Pelosi ....  

Alas, it is not to be.  

So it's ok to hand Iraq over to Iran, as Bush has done, but it's not ok for Pelosi to take a trip to the Middle East.  

Now I understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, if only the wingnuts out there could get as worked up about the Iraqi fiasco as the do about Pelosi &#8230;.  </p>
<p>Alas, it is not to be.  </p>
<p>So it&#8217;s ok to hand Iraq over to Iran, as Bush has done, but it&#8217;s not ok for Pelosi to take a trip to the Middle East.  </p>
<p>Now I understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCinLA</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/comment-page-1/#comment-612659</link>
		<dc:creator>TCinLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/#comment-612659</guid>
		<description>U.S. Rep. Joe Pitts and two other Republican congressmen did not undermine the Bush administration by meeting with Syria's leader Sunday, despite going to Damascus against the president's wishes, Pitts said Wednesday...

Pitts and U.S. Reps. Frank Wolfe of Virginia and Robert Aderholt of Alabama met with Assad Sunday to talk about issues in the Middle East three days before Pelosi's delegation arrived there on a similar mission.

"Dialogue is not a sign of weakness," Pitts said after returning home Wednesday. "It's a sign of strength."

Pitts said the congressional Republicans' meeting with Assad did not undermine Bush because they emphasized the same policies the president advocates.

"The first thing we said was...to appeal to the Syrian government to stop the flow of foreign fighters into Iraq with (explosives) and killing our soldiers in Iraq," Pitts said...

Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill said the Speaker's seven-member delegation â€” six Democrats and one Republican â€” delivered a similar message Wednesday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Rep. Joe Pitts and two other Republican congressmen did not undermine the Bush administration by meeting with Syria&#8217;s leader Sunday, despite going to Damascus against the president&#8217;s wishes, Pitts said Wednesday&#8230;</p>
<p>Pitts and U.S. Reps. Frank Wolfe of Virginia and Robert Aderholt of Alabama met with Assad Sunday to talk about issues in the Middle East three days before Pelosi&#8217;s delegation arrived there on a similar mission.</p>
<p>&#8220;Dialogue is not a sign of weakness,&#8221; Pitts said after returning home Wednesday. &#8220;It&#8217;s a sign of strength.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pitts said the congressional Republicans&#8217; meeting with Assad did not undermine Bush because they emphasized the same policies the president advocates.</p>
<p>&#8220;The first thing we said was&#8230;to appeal to the Syrian government to stop the flow of foreign fighters into Iraq with (explosives) and killing our soldiers in Iraq,&#8221; Pitts said&#8230;</p>
<p>Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill said the Speaker&#8217;s seven-member delegation â€” six Democrats and one Republican â€” delivered a similar message Wednesday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie's Farm</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/comment-page-1/#comment-612657</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie's Farm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/#comment-612657</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Thursday Cocktail Hour Links...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Pelosi Fiasco. It is almost painful to watch people when they are in over their heads. Good commentary from Rick Moran, Riehl, Dino with the WaPo editorial. This groveling photo should doom her - but will it?The Etruscans were from Lydia, says DNA....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Thursday Cocktail Hour Links&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Pelosi Fiasco. It is almost painful to watch people when they are in over their heads. Good commentary from Rick Moran, Riehl, Dino with the WaPo editorial. This groveling photo should doom her - but will it?The Etruscans were from Lydia, says DNA&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/comment-page-1/#comment-612481</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 20:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/04/05/nancy-pelosi-peacemaker-or-klutz/#comment-612481</guid>
		<description>John Blake,
It is interesting that you would bring up Roberts Rules of Order and critize Speaker Pelosi as you did in your little number.  After watching how the Republicans ran House for the past five years and treated the "minority party" with such respect, I am not sure you are a grown up that can even be somewhat objective.  Between Speaker Hastard and even more so, Tom DeLay, the Democratic members of this body were treated worse than the proverbial step child.  And you criticism of the "pork-ignorance and narcissistic foolishess, etc", I have to ask:  Where have you been for the past almost six years?  In a coma?  Or is it you only see injustice when you perceive to be on the receiving end of it?  If you really want to see "radically delusional" I suggest you look into the mirror - as you are radically dishonest as well.  It is people like you that continue to keep this country divided - and you like that.  
By the way, you might also want to check out the pictures of Mrs. Laura Bush, Secretary Rice, Karen Hughes and other White House Republican women who have donned the scarf while visiting countries in the Middle East - as well as the Vatican.  You are such a phony!  And you will note that I did not take myself to your low level and call these women names (childish behavior).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Blake,<br />
It is interesting that you would bring up Roberts Rules of Order and critize Speaker Pelosi as you did in your little number.  After watching how the Republicans ran House for the past five years and treated the &#8220;minority party&#8221; with such respect, I am not sure you are a grown up that can even be somewhat objective.  Between Speaker Hastard and even more so, Tom DeLay, the Democratic members of this body were treated worse than the proverbial step child.  And you criticism of the &#8220;pork-ignorance and narcissistic foolishess, etc&#8221;, I have to ask:  Where have you been for the past almost six years?  In a coma?  Or is it you only see injustice when you perceive to be on the receiving end of it?  If you really want to see &#8220;radically delusional&#8221; I suggest you look into the mirror - as you are radically dishonest as well.  It is people like you that continue to keep this country divided - and you like that.<br />
By the way, you might also want to check out the pictures of Mrs. Laura Bush, Secretary Rice, Karen Hughes and other White House Republican women who have donned the scarf while visiting countries in the Middle East - as well as the Vatican.  You are such a phony!  And you will note that I did not take myself to your low level and call these women names (childish behavior).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
